Related articles

• OJ:C_202604512: Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by the Supreme Court of Norway dated 24 April 2026 in the case of Hemla Africa Holding AS & Others v Philia E&P Holding (Ireland) Limited (Case E-8/26)
• CELEX:62025CO0851_INF: Order of the Court of 9 June 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-851/25 P.
• CELEX:62025CO0883_INF: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 May 2026.#María del Pilar Galindo Giralt v Kingdom of Spain.#Case C-883/25.
• CELEX:62025CO0502_INF: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#„YETTEL BULGARIA“ EAD v FB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Case C-502/25.
• CELEX:62024CJ0518_INF: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#European Commission v Hellenic Republic.#Case C-518/24.
• CELEX:62025CO0850_INF: Order of the Court of 9 June 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-850/25 P.
• CELEX:32026D1947: Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1947 of 21 April 2026 on the signing and conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Djibouti on the status of the European Union-led forces in the Republic of Djibouti in the framework of the European Union maritime security operation to safeguard freedom of navigation in relation to the Red Sea crisis (EUNAVFOR ASPIDES)
• CELEX:32009L0069R(01)
• CELEX:62025CO0582(01)_INF: Order of the General Court (Single Judge), M. Biltgen François of 4 May 2026.#Alireza Malekzadeh Arasteh v European Commission.#Interim relief – Appeal – Application for interim measures – Dismissal of the main action – No need to adjudicate.#Case C-582/25 P-R.
• CELEX:32026R0382R(04)
• CELEX:62026CN0323: Case C-323/26, Protectra: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Leipzig (Germany) lodged on 14 April 2026 – Protectra GmbH v sprd.net AG
• CELEX:62026CN0496: Case C-496/26, Civinity Mājas: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 18 May 2026 – Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs v AS Civinity Mājas
• CELEX:62026TN0374: Case T-374/26: Action brought on 8 June 2026 – Kesaev v Council
• CELEX:62025TA0415: Case T-415/25: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – KH v Commission (Civil service – Temporary staff – Recruitment – Internal competition COM/AST4/2023 – Decision to exclude the applicant from the competition – Failure to attend the oral test on health grounds – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Principle of sound administration – Liability – Non-material damage)
• CELEX:62025TA0356: Case T-356/25, Rapera: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 8 July 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Dioikitiko Protodikeio Thessalonikis – Greece) – AY v Anexartiti Archi Dimosion Esodon (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of VAT – Tax representative appointed as the person liable for payment of VAT – Article 204 of Directive 2006/112/EC – Joint and several liability – Article 205 of Directive 2006/112 – National legislation appointing the tax representative as liable for payment of VAT and providing for his or her joint and several liability – Proportionality)
• CELEX:62026CN0517: Case C-517/26, Aranzadi La Ley: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 21 May 2026 – Aranzadi La Ley S.A.U. v VLex Networks, S.L.
• CELEX:62026CA0182: Case C-182/26 PPU, Hardeker: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Haarlem – Netherlands) – DL v Minister van Asiel en Migratie (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Immigration policy – Return of third-country nationals staying illegally in a Member State – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 3(3) – Country of destination – Article 5 – Principle of non-refoulement – Article 15 – Detention for the purpose of removal – Review of compliance with the conditions governing lawfulness – Time at which compliance with the principle of non-refoulement is examined – Return decision indicating several potential countries of destination – Detention measure
• CELEX:62026TN0415: Case T-415/26: Action brought on 2 July 2026 – Molchanov v Council
• CELEX:62026TN0383: Case T-383/26: Action brought on 19 June 2026 – TZ v EUAA
• CELEX:62024TA0654: Case T-654/24: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – Attilah v EUIPO – Bella Tawziaa II and Groupe Bellakhdar (4011 B552) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark 4011 B552 – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)