Related articles

• CELEX:62024CA0528: Case C-528/24, Boothnesse: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court – Ireland) – in proceedings relating to the execution of arrest warrants issued against LQ, NT, RM (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part – Surrender of a person to the United Kingdom for the purpose of criminal prosecutions – Article 524(2) – Article 604(c) – Real risk to the protection of fundamental rights – Article 625 – Speciality rule – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy
• CELEX:62026TN0282: Case T-282/26: Action brought on 6 May 2026 – Chevtsov v Council
• CELEX:62026CN0041: Case C-41/26, BlackX and Others: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 29 January 2026 – TH, SI, ZU, First Marketing GmbH and BlackX GmbH
• CELEX:62025CB0340: C-340/25, Haischek: Order of the President of the Court of 30 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas – Lithuania) – A.Z. v Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos
• CELEX:62026TN0254: Case T-254/26: Action brought on 23 April 2026 – Bier and Others v ECB
• CELEX:62026TN0293: Case T-293/26: Action brought on 13 May 2026 – SM and Others v Parliament
• CELEX:62025TA0390: Case T-390/25: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2026 – Ixo Restauración v EUIPO – Promollum 142 B (MUKA) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark MUKA – Earlier national word mark LAMUCCA – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 64(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons)
• CELEX:62024CA0446: Case C-446/24, Freie Hansestadt Bremen: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht der Freien Hansestadt Bremen – Germany) – Freie Hansestadt Bremen v DT (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Directive 2008/115/EC – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Article 11(2) – Entry ban – Duration – National legislation which requires, in principle, an indefinite ban on entry and stay in certain cases – Terrorist threat)
• CELEX:62026CN0134: Case C-134/26, Bildungsdirektion für Niederösterreich: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Austria) lodged on 26 February 2026 – NQ and ZI represented by the mother of JF
• CELEX:62026CN0195: Case C-195/26, Lipor and PreZero Portugal II: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 6 March 2026 – LIPOR – Associação de Municípios para a Gestão Sustentável de Resíduos do Grande Porto, PreZero Portugal, S.A. v Semural Waste & Energy, S.A.
• CELEX:62026TN0197: Case T-197/26: Action brought on 23 March 2026 – Black Hammer v EUIPO – Tsi Consumer Goods (Black Hammer USA)
• CELEX:62024CA0887: Case C-887/24, Widl: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht München – Germany) – YH v Widl GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to machinery – Technical standards and regulations – Directive 98/37/EC – Machinery fitted with normal and emergency stopping devices – Essential health and safety requirements – Risks for the health and safety of individuals – Inadvertent or deliberate release of one of the stopping devices – Engagement of the emergency stop device – Appropriate operation to disengage the emergency stopping device)
• CELEX:62024CA0882: Case C-882/24 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 April 2026 – AL v Commission (Appeal – Civil service – Remuneration – Dependent child allowances – Article 2 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Conditions for granting – Withdrawal of entitlement to the allowance – Recovery of overpayments under Article 85 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Action for annulment – Article 91 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Distortion – Assessment of the legality of an act at the date of its adoption – Retroactive scope of a judgment delivered by a national court – Res judicata)
• CELEX:62026TN0268: Case T-268/26: Action brought on 24 April 2026 – SF v eu-LISA
• CELEX:62026TN0249: Case T-249/26: Action brought on 21 April 2026 – CU v EEAS
• CELEX:62025TA0228: Case T-228/25: Judgment of the General Court of 22 April 2026 – Crocs v EUIPO – Gor Factory (Footwear) (European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a shoe – Ground for invalidity – Failure to comply with the requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822 – No individual character – Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002)
• CELEX:62025CA0204: Case C-204/25, Kempen Advies Beerse and Others: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie – Belgium) – Kempen Advies Beerse BV, Compagnie LLC BV, FP Verzekeringen BV, OL v Bank Nagelmackers NV (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 86/653/EEC – Article 15(2) – Article 19 – Self-employed commercial agents – Notice period – Date of expiry of the commercial agency contract)
• CELEX:62025TA0024: Case T-24/25: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2026 – Les Éditions Albert René v EUIPO – Works 11 Michał Lubiński (Obelix) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Obelix – Earlier EU word mark OBELIX – Relative ground for invalidity – Reputation of the earlier mark – Link between the marks at issue – Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
• CELEX:62026TN0278: Case T-278/26: Action brought on 5 May 2026 – Novum Capital Management v EUIPO – Novum Bank (Novum Capital)
• CELEX:62024TA0593: Case T-593/24: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2026 – Brucella Green Vac v Commission (Research and technological development – Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) – Recovery of sums unduly paid under a grant agreement – Termination of the agreement – Enforceable decision – Article 299 TFEU – Principle of good administration – Legitimate expectations – Proportionality – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046)