Admin MPS / ponedeljek, 10. avgust 2026 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62026CN0572: Case C-572/26, Kangi: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus (Estonia) lodged on 28 May 2026 – XXX AS v ZZZ CELEX:62026CN0571: Case C-571/26, Kahmus: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus (Estonia) lodged on 28 May 2026 – YYY OÜ v XXX, represented by insolvency practitioner MX CELEX:62026CN0573: Case C-573/26 P: Appeal brought on 28 May 2026 by Robin Wood – Gewaltfreie Aktionsgemeinschaft für Natur und Umwelt eV, Skydda Skogen – Protect the forest, Zero – Associação Sistema Terrestre Sustentável, Stowarzyszenie Pracownia na rzecz Wszystkich Istot, Päästame Eesti Metsad MTÜ, Stichting Comité Schone Lucht and 2 Celsius against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, sitting with five Judges) delivered on 18/03/2026 in Case T-575/22, Robin Wood and Others v Commission Print 0 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62026CN0415: Case C-415/26, Shopping Cora La Louvière and Others: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance du Brabant Wallon (Belgium) lodged on 27 April 2026 – Shopping Cora La Louvière SA v État belge CELEX:62026CN0432: Case C-432/26, Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 4 May 2026 – Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc. v FormMed HealthCare GmbH CELEX:62025CB0255: Case C-255/25, Technikes Anaktisis kai Diachorismou: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias – Greece) – Technikes Anaktisis kai Diachorismou AE (ECORESET AE) v Perifereia Attikis (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Reply which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law – Private investment aid scheme – Aid scheme compatible with the internal market – Refusal by the competent authority to grant aid under that scheme – Legal action seeking annulment of that refusal decision – Retroactive effect of a possible judicial annulment of that refusal decision – Expiry, during the legal proceedings, of the period laid down for granti CELEX:62024CA0754: Case C-754/24 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 June 2026 – Fachverband Eisenhüttenschlacken v Commission (Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 – Article 42(7) and (8) – Making available on the market of EU fertilising products – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/973 – Article 2(2) and (3) – Criteria on agronomic efficiency and safety for the use of by-products in EU fertilising products – Limit values for chromium and vanadium in EU fertilising products using ferrous slags as by-products – Precautionary principle – Principle of proportionality) CELEX:62024CA0376: Case C-376/24, FSMA: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Bruxelles – Belgium) – MT v Comité de direction de l’Autorité des Services et des Marchés Financiers (FSMA) (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2003/6/EC – Article 3 – Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 – Article 10 – Unlawful disclosure of inside information – Insider dealing and market abuse – Financial services – Article 21 – Disclosure or dissemination of information in the media – Disclosure of inside information in the media by a politician – Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed at Rome on 4 November 1950 – Article 10 – Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Freedom of expres CELEX:62024CA0414: Case C-414/24, Datenschutzbehörde (Relationship between remedies): Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof – Austria) – Datenschutzbehörde, Dr. G S (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Articles 77 and 79 – Remedies – Parallel exercise – Relationship between the lodging of a complaint with a national supervisory authority and the exercise of a judicial remedy – Risk of contradictory decisions – Principle of effective judicial protection – Procedural autonomy of the Member States – Principle of effectiveness – Principle of equivalence) CELEX:62025CA0346: Case C-346/25, Fibo Markets: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud – Czech Republic) – FIBO Markets LTD v J.P. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Conflicts of laws – Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 (Rome I) – Applicable law – Consumer contracts – Exceptions – Financial contracts for differences (CFDs) – Rights and obligations which constitute a financial instrument – Process of setting prices for CFDs – Difference between the exchange rate deviation accepted in the consumer’s order and the exchange rate deviation in the transaction executed) CELEX:62026CN0450: Case C-450/26, UNAA: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 6 May 2026 – Unione Nazionale Avvocati Amministrativisti (UNAA) v Autorità nazionale anticorruzione (ANAC) CELEX:62026TN0393: Case T-393/26: Action brought on 24 June 2026 – Puma v EUIPO – CMS (CMS Italy) CELEX:62026TN0363: Case T-363/26: Action brought on 9 June 2026 – YOU Solutions Germany and Troy Chemical Company v ECHA CELEX:62026CB0278: Case C-278/26 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 30 June 2026 Appeal brought on 1 April 2026 by Puma SE against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 January 2026 – T-43/25, Puma v EUIPO – Ningbo Gongfang Commercial Management (Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed) CELEX:62026TN0391: Case T-391/26: Action brought on 26 June 2026 – Yangzhou Yangjie Electronic Technology v Council CELEX:62026CN0482: Case C-482/26, Breedsloot: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 13 May 2026 – X v Minister van Asiel en Migratie CELEX:62026TN0378: Case T-378/26: Action brought on 15 June 2026 – TX v EISMEA CELEX:62026CN0414: Case C-414/26, Shopping Cora Rocourt and Others: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance du Brabant Wallon (Belgium) lodged on 27 April 2026 – Shopping Cora Rocourt SA v État belge CELEX:62024CA0575: Case C-575/24, Vodovody a kanalizace Přerov: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Městský soud v Praze – Czech Republic) – Vodovody a kanalizace Přerov, a.s. v Úřad pro ochranu osobních údajů (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Open data and the re-use of public sector information – Directive (EU) 2019/1024 – Article 2(3) – Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice – Concept of public undertaking – Undertaking owned by several public sector bodies – Presumption of dominant influence – Criteria for assessment) CELEX:62026CN0416: Case C-416/26, Foncibel and Others: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance du Brabant Wallon (Belgium) lodged on 24 April 2026 – Foncibel SA v État belge CELEX:62026TN0395: Case T-395/26: Action brought on 25 June 2026 – Abanca Corporación Bancaria v EUIPO – Allegro (a FOUNDATION) CELEX:62025TB0533: Case T-533/25: Order of the General Court of 5 June 2026 – Anwar Akkad v Council (Action for annulment – Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – No power of attorney – Inadmissibility) CELEX:62024CA0188: Joined Cases C-188/24 and C-190/24, WebGroup Czech Republic and Others: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 June 2026 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État – France) – WebGroup Czech Republic, a.s., NKL Associates s. r. o. (C-188/24), Coyote System (C-190/24) v Ministre de la Culture, Premier ministre, (C-188/24), Ministre de l’Intérieur et des Outre-mer (C-190/24) (References for a preliminary ruling – Electronic commerce – Directive 2000/31/EC – Information society services – Article 2(h) – Coordinated field – Article 3 – Restriction on the free movement of information society services from another Member State – Derogation – Article 14 – Hosting – Article 15 – No general monitoring obligations – Electronic service to access pornographic co Comments are only visible to subscribers.