Admin MPS / ponedeljek, 04. maj 2026 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62026CN0066: Case C-66/26 P: Appeal brought on 5 February 2026 by SBK Art OOO against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 26 November 2025 in Case T-607/24, SBK Art v Council CELEX:62026CN0062: Case C-62/26 P: Appeal brought on 5 February 2026 by MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, in liquidation, against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 26 November 2025 in Case T-524/22, MeSoFa v Commission and SRB CELEX:62026CN0067: Case C-67/26, Napag Italia: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte di Giustizia Tributaria di secondo grado del Lazio – Roma (Italy) lodged on 4 February 2026 – Napag Italia Srl, in liquidation v Agenzia delle Entrate – Direzione Regionale del Lazio Print 1 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62024TJ0573_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#Romagnoli Fratelli SpA v Community Plant Variety Office.#Plant varieties – Grant of a Community plant variety right for the potato variety Melrose – Failure to pay the annual fee on time – Cancellation of right – Application for restitutio in integrum – Competence of the Board of Appeal – Concept of ‘particular circumstances’ – Conditions for notification of decisions and communications of the CPVO.#Case T-573/24. CELEX:62025TB0005: Case T-5/25: Order of the General Court of 9 March 2026 – HD and Others v Parliament and EEAS (Non-contractual liability – Official assigned to the European Union delegation in a third country – Domestic violence – Diplomatic immunity – Legal basis for the action – Article 270 TFEU – Failure to observe the pre-litigation procedure – Articles 90 and 91 of the Staff Regulations – Manifest inadmissibility) CELEX:62026CN0019: Case C-19/26, D.: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Rzeszowie (Poland) lodged on 20 January 2026 – D. sp. z. o. o. v T. S.A. CELEX:62026CN0080: Case C-80/26, Marmolada: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 11 February 2026 – Marmolada Srl v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni CELEX:62026TN0114: Case T-114/26: Action brought on 16 February 2026 – X Internet and X Holdings v Commission CELEX:62026TN0121: Case T-121/26: Action brought on 16 February 2026 – Musk v Commission CELEX:62025TB0263: Case T-263/25: Order of the General Court of 12 March 2026 – Lami v Frontex CELEX:62026CN0083: Case C-83/26, RailCert Hungary: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Közbeszerzési Hatóság Közbeszerzési Döntőbizottság (Hungary) lodged on 11 February 2026 – RailCert Hungary Kft. v Építési és Közlekedési Minisztérium CELEX:62022CA0403: Case C-403/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – SAS Cargo Group and Others v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Rights of the defence – Right of access to the file – Inculpatory and exculpatory evidence – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified CELEX:62022CA0375: Case C-375/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – Latam Airlines Group and Lan Cargo v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Single and continuous infringement – Failure to prove that a participant was aware of two elements of the infringement – Annulment in part or in full of the Commission’s decision CELEX:62022CA0367: Case C-367/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – Air Canada v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Single and continuous infringement – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 25 – Limitation period for CELEX:62022CA0369: Case C-369/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – Air France v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Calculation of the fine – Mitigating circumstance – Taking into account of regulatory regimes in fo CELEX:62025CN0566: Case C-566/25 P: Appeal brought on 21 August 2025 by FF against the order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 26 June 2025 in Case T-484/24, FF v Eurojust et Europol CELEX:62026CN0081: Case C-81/26, Marmolada: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 11 February 2026 – Marmolada Srl v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni CELEX:62026TN0182: Case T-182/26: Action brought on 16 March 2026 – Simco v EUIPO – On Clouds (CYCLON) CELEX:62026TN0175: Case T-175/26: Action brought on 13 March 2026 – Abanca Corporación Bancaria v EUIPO – Aban (ABAN) CELEX:62022CA0401: Case C-401/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – Cargolux Airlines v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Single and continuous infringement taken as a whole – Substitution of grounds – Restriction CELEX:62026CN0103: Case C-103/26, Tim and AGCOM: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 17 February 2026 – Tim SpA, Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni (AGCOM) v Iliad Italia SpA, Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni (AGCOM) CELEX:62024TA0405: Case T-405/24: Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2026 – Al Dibs v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Criterion of leading businessperson operating in Syria – Presumption of a link with the regime of Bashar al-Assad – Fall of the regime of Bashar Al-Assad – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Right to a fair trial – Right to effective judicial protection – Error of assess CELEX:62022CA0385: Case C-385/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects) Comments are only visible to subscribers.