Related articles

• CELEX:62024CJ0497_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 December 2025.#GC, en son nom propre et en tant que propriétaire de l’exploitation agricole du même nom v Regione Marche.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Support programme in the wine sector – Financing – Article 50 – European Union contribution – Calculation of the maximum aid rate – Inclusion of a tax credit provided for by national legislation.#Case C-497/24.
• CELEX:62024CJ0340_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#EW and LO v Ministero dell’Istruzione e del Merito and Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of persons – Articles 45 and 49 TFEU – Recognition of professional qualifications – Right to pursue the profession of a support teacher in a Member State – Nationals of that Member State who have obtained evidence of formal qualifications issued by a private higher education institute in another Member State – Formal qualification which is not legally recognised and does not give access to the corresponding profession in the latter Member State – Obligation on the first M
• CELEX:32019R0943R(04)
• CELEX:32024R3005R(01)
• CELEX:32020R1784R(09)
• CELEX:32026D02616: Decision of the Quaestors of the European Parliament of 29 April 2026 amending the Annex to the decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 23 March 2011 entitled Rules concerning the ban on smoking on European Parliament’s premises
• CELEX:62024TJ0573_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#Romagnoli Fratelli SpA v Community Plant Variety Office.#Plant varieties – Grant of a Community plant variety right for the potato variety Melrose – Failure to pay the annual fee on time – Cancellation of right – Application for restitutio in integrum – Competence of the Board of Appeal – Concept of ‘particular circumstances’ – Conditions for notification of decisions and communications of the CPVO.#Case T-573/24.
• CELEX:32026D1006: Council Decision (EU) 2026/1006 of 27 April 2026 appointing an alternate member, proposed by the Republic of Poland, of the Committee of the Regions
• CELEX:32014L0052R(04)
• CELEX:32026D1005: Council Decision (EU) 2026/1005 of 27 April 2026 appointing nine members, proposed by the Portuguese Republic, of the Committee of the Regions
• CELEX:32026D1004: Council Decision (EU) 2026/1004 of 27 April 2026 appointing an alternate member, proposed by the Kingdom of the Netherlands, of the Committee of the Regions
• CELEX:32011R1169R(25)
• CELEX:32011L0092R(06)
• CELEX:32024R1689R(04)
• CELEX:32026D1010: Council Decision (EU) 2026/1010 of 27 April 2026 appointing a member and an alternate member, proposed by the Federal Republic of Germany, of the Committee of the Regions
• CELEX:62026CN0094: Case C-94/26, WineCorps: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 16 February 2026 – WineCorps Zrt. v Nemzeti Élelmiszerlánc-biztonsági Hivatal
• CELEX:62026TN0173: Case T-173/26: Action brought on 12 March 2026 – Blach-Pol Krzysztofik, Pałyga v EUIPO – Szymczuk (Roof coverings)
• CELEX:62025TB0845: Case T-845/25, Ryanair DAC: Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber sitting with five judges) of 23 February 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln – Germany) – ZB, JG, YZ, TA and BX v Ryanair DAC)
• CELEX:62026CN0008: Case C-8/26, Bager: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bezirksgericht Feldkirch (Austria) lodged on 12 January 2026 – RN v V AG
• CELEX:62025TA0006: Case T-6/25: Judgment of the General Court of 11 March 2026 – QI v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Psychological harassment – Article 12(a) of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Refusal of request – Substantial new facts that may justify the submission of a request for reconsideration of a previous decision – Prima facie evidence of the alleged psychological harassment – Liability)