Related articles

• CELEX:62025TN0689: Case T-689/25, James Howden and Co.: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht, Außenstelle Graz (Austria) made on 18 September 2025 – James Howden & Company Limited v Finanzamt Österreich
• CELEX:62026TN0007: Case T-7/26: Action brought on 9 January 2026 – Seres Auto (Hubei) v Commission
• CELEX:62024CA0742: Case C-742/24, Havvitt: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 January 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court – Ireland) – International Protection Appeals Tribunal, Minister for Justice, Ireland, Attorney General v L.K. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/33/EU – Article 15(1) – Access to the labour market as an applicant for international protection – Refusal of a request to access the labour market – Reason for the refusal – Delay in the processing of the application for international protection attributable in part to the applicant)
• CELEX:62024CA0124: Case C-124/24 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 January 2026 – Asociación Profesional de Empresas de Reparto y Manipulado de Correspondencia (Asempre) v European Commission (Appeal – State aid – Postal service – Compensation for the universal postal service – Decision not to initiate the formal investigation procedure – Action for annulment – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Standing to bring proceedings – Condition that the applicant must be individually concerned by the decision – Effective judicial protection – Action brought by a professional association – Inadmissibility of the action for annulment)
• CELEX:62024TA0628: Case T-628/24: Judgment of the General Court of 14 January 2026 – Lego v EUIPO – Guangdong Qman Toys Industry (Building block from a toy building set) (European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a building block from a toy building set – Earlier EU design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – No different overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)
• CELEX:62024TA0517: Case T-517/24: Judgment of the General Court of 14 January 2026 – Froneri Bulgaria v EUIPO – Daesef (Box with lid) (European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a box with a lid – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Different overall impression – Novelty – Articles 5 and 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822)
• CELEX:62025TA0117: Case T-117/25: Judgment of the Court of 14 January 2026 – Atlas Invest v EUIPO (BioTechUSA) (EU trade mark – Application for the European Union figurative mark BioTechUSA – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
• CELEX:62025TA0078: Case T-78/25: Judgment of the General Court of 21 January 2026 – Synonym Software v EUIPO (PAYKIT) (EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark PAYKIT – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Principle of sound administration)
• CELEX:62025CN0760: Case C-760/25, CNP Caution: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judiciaire de Guéret (France) lodged on 25 November 2025 – CNP Caution SA v HU, spouse of VM, VM
• CELEX:62026TN0048: Case T-48/26: Action brought on 23 January 2026 – Decora v EUIPO (CUTTING LINES)
• CELEX:62024TA0308: Case T-308/24: Judgment of the General Court of 14 January 2026 – Engie E.S. v Parliament (Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Operation and maintenance of technical installations in the buildings of the Parliament in Strasbourg – Rejection of tender submitted by a tenderer and award of the contract to another tenderer – Compliance of the tender with the minimum requirements – Manifest error of assessment)
• CELEX:62024CA0588: Case C-588/24, Imballaggi Piemontesi: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 January 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato – Italy) – Imballaggi Piemontesi Srl v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM) (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 101 TFEU – Prohibition of restrictive practices – Procedures for infringement of the rules of competition law conducted by the national competition authorities – Compliance with a reasonable time limit – Time limit for closure of the investigation stage of the infringement proceedings – National legislation allowing the national competition authority unilaterally to postpone that time limit on account of circumstances which lead to an extension of the subject matte
• CELEX:62023CA0692: Case C-692/23, AVR-Afvalverwerking: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 January 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Den Haag – Netherlands) – AVR-Afvalverwerking BV v NV BAR-Afvalbeheer, Gemeente Barendrecht, Gemeente Albrandswaard, Gemeente Ridderkerk, NV Irado, Afvalsturing Friesland NV (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12(3) – Public contract awarded directly to a legal person jointly controlled by the contracting authorities – Conditions – Threshold of the activities of the controlled legal person carried out in the performance of tasks entrusted to it by the contracting authorities – Article 12(5) – Consideration of the turnover of the subsidiaries of the group of which the contr
• CELEX:62025TN0855: Case T-855/25: Action brought on 15 December 2025 – Hungary v Court of Justice of the European Union
• CELEX:62024CA0077: Case C-77/24, Wunner: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 January 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof – Austria) – NM, OU v TE (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Law applicable to non-contractual obligations – Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 – Article 4(1) – Scope – Liability in tort or delict of an officer of a company that organises online games of chance without holding the required licence – Action for the recovery of gambling losses – Place where the damage occurred)
• CELEX:62024CA0075: Case C-75/24 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 January 2026 – XH v European Commission (Appeal – Civil service – European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – Allegations of psychological harassment during periods of sick leave – Rejection of the request for assistance and of the claim for compensation – Opening of an invalidity procedure – Action for annulment and for damages – Admissibility – Acts open to challenge – Obligation on the part of the General Court of the European Union to state reasons – Contradictory reasoning – Distortion of the facts and evidence)
• CELEX:62025CN0776: Case C-776/25, AVG Altersvorsorge: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 3 December 2025 – AVG Altersvorsorge Genossenschaft eG i.L. v LS
• CELEX:62025CN0857: Case C-857/25, Urbe Vigilanza: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 19 December 2025 – Urbe Vigilanza SpA v Sistemi di Sicurezza Srl
• CELEX:62025TN0843: Case T-843/25: Action brought on 9 December 2025 – Kesaev v Council
• CELEX:62023CA0641: Case C-641/23, Dubers: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 January 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam – Netherlands) – Criminal proceedings against YM (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of conducting a criminal prosecution – Article 2(4) – Condition of double criminality – Article 4(1) – Ground for optional non-execution of the European arrest warrant – Article 5(3) – Surrender of the person concerned subject to a guarantee of that person’s return to the executing Member State in order to serve there a custodial sentence or detention order passed in the issuing Memb