Admin MPS / četrtek, 11. december 2025 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62025CO0163_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 October 2025.#SC Sadalbari SRL v Autoritatea de Supraveghere Financiară.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Case C-163/25. CELEX:62025CO0163: Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 3 octobre 2025.#SC Sadalbari SRL contre Autoritatea de Supraveghere Financiară.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Réponse pouvant être clairement déduite de la jurisprudence – Marchés d’instruments financiers – Directive 2004/39/CE – Article 4, paragraphe 1, point 14 – Notion de “marché réglementé” – Agrément – Exigences de fonctionnement – Marché administré, à la suite d’une fusion, par une personne morale administrant également un marché réglementé – Article 94, sous c), du règlement de procédure – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-163/25. CELEX:62025CO0168: Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 25 février 2026.#Bytové družstvo so sídlom v Trnave contre Prima banka Slovensko, a.s.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Protection des consommateurs – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Directive 93/13 – Article 2, sous b) – Notion de consommateur – Personne morale gérante d’un immeuble ayant conclu un contrat de crédit pour le compte des copropriétaires – Non-inclusion.#Affaire C-168/25. Print 5 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62024CJ0008_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 March 2026.##Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Regulation (EU) 2018/1805 – Article 1(1) and (4) – Confiscation order issued in criminal proceedings – Point 2 of Article 2 and point 3(a) and (d) of Article 2 – Confiscation in relation to a criminal offence, but without a final conviction – Confiscation order imposed in a judgment of acquittal finding that the goods to be confiscated are the product of a criminal offence other than the offence giving rise to that judgment and in which offence persons other than the defendants acquitted were involved – No indictment against those persons – Article 19(1)(h) – Grounds for non-recognition and no CELEX:62024CJ0008: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 March 2026.##Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Regulation (EU) 2018/1805 – Article 1(1) and (4) – Confiscation order issued in criminal proceedings – Point 2 of Article 2 and point 3(a) and (d) of Article 2 – Confiscation in relation to a criminal offence, but without a final conviction – Confiscation order imposed in a judgment of acquittal finding that the goods to be confiscated are the product of a criminal offence other than the offence giving rise to that judgment and in which offence persons other than the defendants acquitted were involved – No indictment against those persons – Article 19(1)(h) – Grounds for non-recognition and non-ex CELEX:62024CJ0258_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 March 2026.#Katholische Schwangerschaftsberatung v JB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Occupational activities within churches and other organisations the ethos of which is based on religion or belief – Associating providing counselling on pregnancy to pregnant women – Occupational requirements – Acting in good faith and with loyalty to the ethos of the church or organisation – Difference of treatment on grounds of religion or belief – Dismissal of a worker on the ground of her leaving the Catholic church.#Case C-258/24. CELEX:62024CJ0258: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 March 2026.#Katholische Schwangerschaftsberatung v JB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Occupational activities within churches and other organisations the ethos of which is based on religion or belief – Associating providing counselling on pregnancy to pregnant women – Occupational requirements – Acting in good faith and with loyalty to the ethos of the church or organisation – Difference of treatment on grounds of religion or belief – Dismissal of a worker on the ground of her leaving the Catholic church.#Case C-258/24. CELEX:32019R0877R(03) CELEX:32026D0580: Council Decision (EU) 2026/580 of 24 November 2025 on the signing and conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation establishing a framework for the participation of the Swiss Confederation in European Union crisis management operations CELEX:32026D0612: Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/612 of 16 March 2026 in support of a global reporting mechanism on illicit conventional arms and their ammunition to reduce the risk of their diversion and illicit transfer (‘iTrace VI’) CELEX:32026D0584: Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/584 of 16 March 2026 in support of building African capacities towards a mine-free Africa CELEX:32026D0643: Council Decision (EU) 2026/643 of 23 February 2026 on the signing of the Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation on the transfer of Passenger Name Record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime CELEX:32014R0806R(12) CELEX:32026D0587: Council Decision (EU) 2026/587 of 9 March 2026 authorising the opening of negotiations for an agreement between the European Union and Ukraine laying down the rules for the participation of Ukraine in the GOVSATCOM component of the Union Space Programme and in the Union Secure Connectivity Programme, and for access to GOVSATCOM services and to the governmental services of the Union Secure Connectivity Programme CELEX:62023TJ1129_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 December 2025.#Intel Corporation Inc. v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Microprocessors market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – ‘Naked’ restrictions – Consequences of the annulment in part of an earlier decision – Nature of the infringement – Amount of the fine – 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines – Proportionality – Whether appropriate – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-1129/23. CELEX:62025TJ0693_INF: Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 11 février 2026.#Maya Tokareva contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises eu égard aux actions compromettant ou menaçant l’intégrité territoriale, la souveraineté et l’indépendance de l’Ukraine – Gel des fonds – Liste des personnes, des entités et des organismes auxquels s’applique le gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Réinscription du nom du requérant sur la liste – Notion d’“avantage tiré d’une femme ou d’un homme d’affaires influent exerçant des activités en Russie” – Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous g), de la décision 2014/145/PESC – Erreur d’appréciation – Article 266 TFUE.#Affaire T-693/25. CELEX:62023TJ0265_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 May 2025.#Verband der Deutschen Kutter- und Küstenfischer eV (VDK) v European Commission.#Case T-265/23. CELEX:62023TJ0219_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 December 2025.#Bategu Gummitechnologie GmbH v European Commission.#Case T-219/23. CELEX:62024TO0223_INF: Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 July 2025.#Pinpoint Innovations Ltd v European Commission.#Research and technological development – Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) – Development of a data analysis system to reduce delays in healthcare – Grant agreement – Actual recovery of a debt by the mutual insurance mechanism – Manifest lack of jurisdiction in part – Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-223/24. CELEX:62024CJ0465_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#SBK Art Limited Liability Company v Fortenova Group STAK Stichting and Open Pass Limited.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Concept of ‘freezing of funds’ – Article 1(f) – Exercise by a person subject to restrictive measures of the rights, attached to depositary receipts, to attend, and vote in, a meeting of holders of such instruments.#Case C-465/24. CELEX:62024CA0554: Case C-554/24 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 January 2026 – Republic of Poland v European Commission (Appeal – Articles 259, 260 and 279 TFEU – Compliance by a Member State with an order of the Vice-President of the Court imposing interim measures – Obligation to pay a daily penalty until the order is complied with – Failure to take the necessary measures to comply with the order and to pay the periodic penalty – Removal of the case on the merits from the register – Recovery by way of set-off of debts arising from the non-payment of the periodic penalty – Action for annulment) CELEX:62025CN0619: Case C-619/25 P: Appeal brought on 18 September 2025 by Guangzhou Wanglaoji Grand Health Co. Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 9 July 2025 in Joined Cases T-121/24 – T-127/24 and T-129/24, Guangzhou Wanglaoji Grand Health v EUIPO – Multi Access CELEX:62026CN0049: Case C-49/26: Action brought on 30 January 2026 – European Commission v Italian Republic Comments are only visible to subscribers.