Admin MPS / sreda, 14. januar 2026 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62025CO0137_INF: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 November 2025.#J.F. and P.F. v Bank BPH S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#Case C-137/25. CELEX:62025CO0137: Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 10 novembre 2025.#J.F. et P.F. contre Bank BPH S.A.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Réponse pouvant être clairement déduite de la jurisprudence – Protection des consommateurs – Directive 93/13/CEE – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Effets de la constatation du caractère abusif d’une clause – Contrat de prêt hypothécaire indexé sur une devise étrangère – Détermination du taux de change entre les devises – Élément abusif d’une clause de conversion – Article 267 TFUE – Réglementation imposant à une juridiction inférieure de se conformer aux appréciations d’une juridiction supérieure – Principe de primauté du droit de l’Union – Obligations du juge n CELEX:62025CO0145: Order of the Court of 25 June 2025.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-145/25 P. Print 6 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62024CJ0008_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 March 2026.##Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Regulation (EU) 2018/1805 – Article 1(1) and (4) – Confiscation order issued in criminal proceedings – Point 2 of Article 2 and point 3(a) and (d) of Article 2 – Confiscation in relation to a criminal offence, but without a final conviction – Confiscation order imposed in a judgment of acquittal finding that the goods to be confiscated are the product of a criminal offence other than the offence giving rise to that judgment and in which offence persons other than the defendants acquitted were involved – No indictment against those persons – Article 19(1)(h) – Grounds for non-recognition and no CELEX:62024CJ0008: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 March 2026.##Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Regulation (EU) 2018/1805 – Article 1(1) and (4) – Confiscation order issued in criminal proceedings – Point 2 of Article 2 and point 3(a) and (d) of Article 2 – Confiscation in relation to a criminal offence, but without a final conviction – Confiscation order imposed in a judgment of acquittal finding that the goods to be confiscated are the product of a criminal offence other than the offence giving rise to that judgment and in which offence persons other than the defendants acquitted were involved – No indictment against those persons – Article 19(1)(h) – Grounds for non-recognition and non-ex CELEX:62024CJ0258_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 March 2026.#Katholische Schwangerschaftsberatung v JB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Occupational activities within churches and other organisations the ethos of which is based on religion or belief – Associating providing counselling on pregnancy to pregnant women – Occupational requirements – Acting in good faith and with loyalty to the ethos of the church or organisation – Difference of treatment on grounds of religion or belief – Dismissal of a worker on the ground of her leaving the Catholic church.#Case C-258/24. CELEX:62024CJ0258: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 March 2026.#Katholische Schwangerschaftsberatung v JB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Occupational activities within churches and other organisations the ethos of which is based on religion or belief – Associating providing counselling on pregnancy to pregnant women – Occupational requirements – Acting in good faith and with loyalty to the ethos of the church or organisation – Difference of treatment on grounds of religion or belief – Dismissal of a worker on the ground of her leaving the Catholic church.#Case C-258/24. CELEX:32019R0877R(03) CELEX:32026D0580: Council Decision (EU) 2026/580 of 24 November 2025 on the signing and conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation establishing a framework for the participation of the Swiss Confederation in European Union crisis management operations CELEX:32026D0612: Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/612 of 16 March 2026 in support of a global reporting mechanism on illicit conventional arms and their ammunition to reduce the risk of their diversion and illicit transfer (‘iTrace VI’) CELEX:32026D0584: Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/584 of 16 March 2026 in support of building African capacities towards a mine-free Africa CELEX:32026D0643: Council Decision (EU) 2026/643 of 23 February 2026 on the signing of the Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation on the transfer of Passenger Name Record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime CELEX:32014R0806R(12) CELEX:32026D0587: Council Decision (EU) 2026/587 of 9 March 2026 authorising the opening of negotiations for an agreement between the European Union and Ukraine laying down the rules for the participation of Ukraine in the GOVSATCOM component of the Union Space Programme and in the Union Secure Connectivity Programme, and for access to GOVSATCOM services and to the governmental services of the Union Secure Connectivity Programme CELEX:62023TJ1129_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 December 2025.#Intel Corporation Inc. v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Microprocessors market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – ‘Naked’ restrictions – Consequences of the annulment in part of an earlier decision – Nature of the infringement – Amount of the fine – 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines – Proportionality – Whether appropriate – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-1129/23. CELEX:62025TJ0693_INF: Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 11 février 2026.#Maya Tokareva contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises eu égard aux actions compromettant ou menaçant l’intégrité territoriale, la souveraineté et l’indépendance de l’Ukraine – Gel des fonds – Liste des personnes, des entités et des organismes auxquels s’applique le gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Réinscription du nom du requérant sur la liste – Notion d’“avantage tiré d’une femme ou d’un homme d’affaires influent exerçant des activités en Russie” – Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous g), de la décision 2014/145/PESC – Erreur d’appréciation – Article 266 TFUE.#Affaire T-693/25. CELEX:62023TJ0265_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 May 2025.#Verband der Deutschen Kutter- und Küstenfischer eV (VDK) v European Commission.#Case T-265/23. CELEX:62023TJ0219_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 December 2025.#Bategu Gummitechnologie GmbH v European Commission.#Case T-219/23. CELEX:62024TO0223_INF: Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 July 2025.#Pinpoint Innovations Ltd v European Commission.#Research and technological development – Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) – Development of a data analysis system to reduce delays in healthcare – Grant agreement – Actual recovery of a debt by the mutual insurance mechanism – Manifest lack of jurisdiction in part – Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-223/24. CELEX:62024CJ0465_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#SBK Art Limited Liability Company v Fortenova Group STAK Stichting and Open Pass Limited.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Concept of ‘freezing of funds’ – Article 1(f) – Exercise by a person subject to restrictive measures of the rights, attached to depositary receipts, to attend, and vote in, a meeting of holders of such instruments.#Case C-465/24. CELEX:62024CA0453: Case C-453/24, Hadenov: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 January 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad – Bulgaria) – Criminal proceedings against BC (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA – Mutual recognition of financial penalties – Article 7(2)(g) – Ground for non-recognition and non-execution – Informing the person concerned of his or her right to contest the case and of the time limits of such a legal remedy – Article 7(3) – Obligation to consult the competent authority of the issuing Member State) CELEX:62026TN0050: Case T-50/26: Action brought on 23 January 2026 – QI v Commission CELEX:62024CA0413: Case C-413/24, Vlaams Gewest: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 January 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the ondernemingsrechtbank Gent, afdeling Oostende – Belgium) – Vlaams Gewest v P&O North Sea Ferries Limited, P&O Ferries Limited (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EEC) No 4055/86 – Application of the principle of freedom to provide services to maritime transport between Member States and between Member States and third countries – Article 56 TFEU – Article 191 of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part – Freedom to provide services – Restrictions – Nation Comments are only visible to subscribers.