Related articles

• CELEX:62024CA0126: Case C-126/24 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 January 2026 – Uno Organización Empresarial de Logística y Transporte v European Commission (Appeal – State aid – Postal service – Compensation for the universal postal service – Decision not to initiate the formal investigation procedure – Action for annulment – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Standing to bring proceedings – Condition that the applicant must be individually concerned by the decision – Effective judicial protection – Action brought by a professional association – Inadmissibility of the action for annulment)
• CELEX:62026TN0001: Case T-1/26: Action brought on 2 January 2026 – PK v European Public Prosecutor’s Office
• CELEX:62024CA0129: Case C-129/24, Coillte Cuideachta Ghníomhaíochta Ainmnithe: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 January 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court – Ireland) – Coillte Cuideachta Ghníomhaíochta Ainmnithe v Commissioner for Environmental Information (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Aarhus Convention – Directive 2003/4/EC – Public access to environmental information – Concepts of applicant and request – Anonymous applicants or applicants using pseudonyms – Right of access to environmental information – Practical arrangements – Obligation for applicants to provide their actual name and a current physical address – Invalidity of the request)
• CELEX:62024TA0561: Case T-561/24: Judgment of the General Court of 21 January 2026 – Universal Brand Group v EUIPO – Elon Group (Elton) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Elton – Earlier national word mark ELON – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
• CELEX:62026CN0020: Case C-20/26 P: Appeal brought on 19 January 2026 by Piql AS against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 19 November 2025 in Case T-158/24, Piql v Commission
• CELEX:62025CN0861: Case C-861/25: Action brought on 19 December 2025 – European Commission v Republic of Poland
• CELEX:62026TN0027: Case T-27/26: Action brought on 15 January 2026 – Grupa Azoty Zakłady Fosforowe/EUIPO – EuroChem Agro (amofoska)
• CELEX:62025TN0904: Case T-904/25: Action brought on 23 December 2025 – Gall v EUIPO – Wörwag Pharma (Vitagamma)
• CELEX:62025CB0220: Case C-220/25, Miskolci Törvényszék: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Pécsi Törvényszék – Hungary) – ER v Miskolci Törvényszék (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94(b) and (c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the legal context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred – Lack of sufficient details – Manifest inadmissibility)
• CELEX:62024TA0093: Case T-93/24: Judgment of the General Court of 21 January 2026 – Lantmännen and Lantmännen Biorefineries v Commission (Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Markets for ethanol and for bioethanol – Decision establishing an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Staggered hybrid procedure – Presumption of innocence – Impartiality)
• CELEX:62025TA0064: Case T-64/25: Judgment of the General Court of 14 January 2026 – Leone and Others v EUIPO – Incom (Leone) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Leone – Relative ground for invalidity – Right to an earlier name under Austrian law – Article 60(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
• CELEX:62025TA0266: Case T-266/25: Judgment of the General Court of 21 January 2026 – HTG v EUIPO (DEINS) (EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark DEINS – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
• CELEX:62025CN0765: Case C-765/25, Voking: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 27 November 2025 – LN v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság
• CELEX:62026TN0044: Case T-44/26: Action brought on 20 January 2026 – Ryanair et Ryanair Sun v Commission
• CELEX:62024TA0176: Case T-176/24: Judgment of the General Court of 14 January 2026 – Al Akhras v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Family membership criterion – Criterion of association with members of the Assad or Makhlouf families – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Communication of the restrictive measures – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Freedom to conduct a business – R
• CELEX:62024TA0218: Case T-218/24: Judgment of the General Court of 21 January 2026 – DT v Eulex Kosovo (Arbitration clause – Common foreign and security policy – International civilian staff of EU international missions – Consecutive fixed-term contracts – Termination of the applicant’s contract – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of sound administration – Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff – Misuse of powers – Equal treatment – Legitimate expectations)
• CELEX:62025CN0798: Case C-798/25, MV-expo: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud (Czech Republic) lodged on 9 December 2025 – MV-expo, s.r.o. v IMMIX spol. s r. o.
• CELEX:62025TN0907: Case T-907/25: Action brought on 26 December 2025 – Front Polisario v Council
• CELEX:62026TN0016: Case T-16/26: Action brought on 13 January 2026 – Riedl v EUIPO (Aromapressur)
• CELEX:62025CN0847: Case C-847/25, Avocats.be and Liga voor Mensenrechten: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle (Belgium) lodged on 17 December 2025 – Ordre des barreaux francophones et germanophone and Liga voor Mensenrechten, ASBL v Conseil des ministres