Related articles

• CELEX:62024CJ0748: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 April 2026.#Okresná prokuratúra Bratislava III v AC.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Articles 3 and 4 – Presumption of innocence – Article 48(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Order that no further action be taken – Judicial decision that is not a decision on guilt – Setting aside and referral back to a lower court – Findings made by the higher court as to whether the constituent elements of the offence concerned are present – Obligation on the part of the lower court to comply with the rulings of the higher court – Appropriate measures in the event of breach of the presumption of innoc
• CELEX:62025CC0190: Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 30 April 2026.###
• CELEX:62025CC0121: Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 30 April 2026.###
• CELEX:62025TO0618:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (sixième chambre) du 28 avril 2026.#Les Patriotes contre Commission européenne.#Recours en annulation – Accès aux documents – Délai de recours – Tardiveté – Acte non susceptible de recours – Irrecevabilité partielle – Demande d’injonction – Incompétence partielle.#Affaire T-618/25.
• CELEX:62024TJ0690_SUM: Judgment of the General Court (Chamber giving preliminary rulings) of 26 November 2025.#Inspecteur van de Douane v FL.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof 's-Hertogenbosch.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 10(2) and (4) of Directive 2008/118 – Occurrence of an irregularity during a movement of excise goods – Movement of goods under a duty suspension arrangement – Detection of the irregularity during the movement – Quantity of missing goods detected when unloading the means of transport.#Case T-690/24.
• CELEX:62025CJ0246: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 April 2026.#AS v BNP Paribas Bank Polska S.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Effects of a finding that a term is unfair – Addendum to a mortgage loan agreement – Consequences of the nullity of that addendum on the validity of that contract – Principles of effectiveness and proportionality – Deterrent effect – Conditions for the continued existence of the contract – Obligations of the national court.#Case C-246/25.
• CELEX:62024CJ0133: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 April 2026.#CD Tondela – Futebol, SAD and Others v Autoridade da Concorrência.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Professional football – No-poach-of-players agreement, concluded by a national sports association and a group of clubs following the suspension of the 2019/2020 sporting season due to the COVID-19 pandemic – Article 101(1) TFEU – Restriction of competition by object or by effect – Labour market – Recruitment of players by clubs – Unilateral termination of employment contract by players – Expiration of employment contract – Content of the agreement – Economic and legal context surrounding the agreement – Competition-related objective aims of the agreement – Whether justified – Conditions – Pursuit of
• CELEX:62023CJ0479: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 30 April 2026.#European Commission v Republic of Bulgaria.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Directive (EU) 2019/520 – Interoperability of electronic road toll systems and facilitation of cross-border exchange of information on the failure to pay road fees in the European Union – Failure to transpose – Failure to notify potential transposition measures – Article 260(3) TFEU – Application for an order to pay a lump sum.#Case C-479/23.
• CELEX:62021TO0145(01)_INF: Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 February 2026.#Ivan Fursin and Others v European Central Bank.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Material damage – Causal link – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-145/21.
• CELEX:62025CJ0191: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 April 2026.#Wenzel Logistics GmbH v Mercedes-Benz Group AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 101 TFEU – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Directive 2014/104/EU – Article 3(2) – Right to full compensation for harm caused by a cartel – Payment of interest – Article 22(2) – Temporal application of national transposition provisions – Determination of the date from which interest is due – Time when the harm occurred in the case of the acquisition of goods at inflated prices.#Case C-191/25.
• CELEX:62024TJ0494_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 22 April 2026.#Emmanouil Peponis v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark CRETE HOMES REAL ESTATE CRETE PROPERTY and CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS SINCE 1990 – Relative ground for refusal – Consent of the proprietor of the trade mark – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Article 8(3) of Regulation No 40/94 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-494/24.
• CELEX:62025TO0158_INF: Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 February 2026.#Fédération européenne d'associations et d'industries pharmaceutiques (EFPIA) v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Environment – Urban wastewater treatment – Articles 1, 2, 9, 10 and 30 of, and Annex III to, Directive (EU) 2024/3019 – Extended producer responsibility for medicinal products for human use and cosmetic products – Standing to bring proceedings – Lack of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-158/25.
• CELEX:62025CC0157:           Conclusions de l'avocat général M. A. Biondi, présentées le 30 avril 2026.###
• CELEX:62025TJ0326_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 March 2026.#Kiss Nail Products, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark IMPRESS – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Legal certainty – Equal treatment – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-326/25.
• CELEX:62024CJ0127: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 April 2026.#Gesellschaft für musikalische Aufführungs- und mechanische Vervielfältigungsrechte eV (GEMA) v VHC 2 Seniorenresidenz und Pflegeheim gGmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 3(1) – Communication to the public – Concept – Retransmission of a signal via a cable network of a retirement home – Specific technical means – New public.#Case C-127/24.
• CELEX:62025CJ0301: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 April 2026.#Lidl Italia Srl v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices – Directive 2005/29/EC – Scope – Relationship between the provisions of that directive and other EU rules regulating specific aspects of unfair commercial practices – Article 3(4) – Unfair food information practices – Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 – Whether there is a conflict – Complementary nature of systems of protection.#Case C-301/25.
• CELEX:62024CJ0665_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 December 2025.#Staatssecretaris Jeugd, Preventie en Sport v Diamond Flavours BV and UEG Holland BV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2014/40/EU – Article 2(40) – Concept of ‘placing on the market’ – Article 23(2) and (3) – Checks on the implementation of Directive 2014/40 – Objective of ensuring a high level of health protection – Approximation of laws – Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products – Supply of refill containers for electronic cigarettes displaying an incorrect indication of the nicotine content on their packaging by a distributor of tobacco and related products to a retail outlet – Fine imposed on
• CELEX:62025CJ0031: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 30 April 2026.#Yavor Markov v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – Recruitment – Competition EPSO/AD/383/21 – Decision not to include the appellant on the reserve list – Legal framework applicable to a competition – Arrangements for and duration of the oral presentation test – Legitimate expectations – Article 1(1) of Annex III to the Staff Regulations – Principle of good administration – General rules governing Open Competitions – Code of good administrative behaviour for staff of the European Commission in their relations with the public – European Parliament resolution for an open, efficient and independent European Union administration – Action for annulment and for compensation.#Case C-31/25 P.
• CELEX:62024CJ0570_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#Transilvania Master Insolv IPURL, en tant d’administrateur judiciaire d’ Ecoserv SRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Excise duties – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 8(1)(a)(i) and (2) – Person liable to pay excise duty – Quantity of ethyl alcohol missing from a company’s business assets – Managing director of a company guilty of embezzlement and of a failure to make entries in the accounts – Determination of the person liable to pay excise duty – More than one person liable – Effect of a judgment of a criminal court delivered in respect of civil matters, finding the managin
• CELEX:62025TJ0056_INF:           Arrêt du Tribunal (neuvième chambre) du 22 avril 2026.#Rose Bikes GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne verbale ROSE – Motif absolu de refus – Caractère descriptif – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous c), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Caractéristiques objectives et inhérentes à la nature des produits et des services – Rapport suffisamment direct et concret.#Affaire T-56/25.