Admin MPS / ponedeljek, 15. junij 2026 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62025CB0508: Joined Cases C-508/25, C-629/25 and C-639/25, Volkswagen: Order of the President of the Court of 3 March 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bezirksgericht Telfs, Landesgericht Leoben – Austria) – KA, A, G A v Volkswagen AG, V, V AG CELEX:62025CB0502: Case C-502/25, YETTEL BULGARIA II: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad – Bulgaria) – YETTEL BULGARIA EAD v FB (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a response by the Court and the relationship between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility) CELEX:62025CB0516: Case C-516/25 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 April 2026 Appeal brought on 29 July 2025 by Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA), Bernard O’Connor against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 May 2025 – T-70/25, APEDA and O’Connor v Commission (Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Public access to documents of the EU institutions – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Article 4 – Exceptions to the right of access – Request for access to certain documents relating to an application for registration of a name as a protected geographical indication – Partial refusal to grant access – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings) Print 3 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62026TO0024: Ordonnance du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 17 juillet 2026.#Alfio Cerami contre Commission européenne.#Fonction publique – Article 76, sous d), du règlement de procédure – Méconnaissance des exigences de forme – Recours manifestement irrecevable – Demande d’aide juridictionnelle.#Affaire T-24/26. CELEX:62024TO0116(01): Beschluss des Gerichts (Zweite Kammer) vom 17. Juli 2026.#DZ Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank, Frankfurt am Main gegen Einheitlicher Abwicklungsausschuss.#Wirtschafts- und Währungspolitik – Bankenunion – Einheitlicher Abwicklungsmechanismus für Kreditinstitute und bestimmte Wertpapierfirmen (SRM) – Verordnung (EU) Nr. 806/2014 – Mindestanforderung an Eigenmittel und berücksichtigungsfähige Verbindlichkeiten – Entscheidung des Beschwerdeausschusses des SRB über die Festlegung von Mindestanforderungen an Eigenmittel und berücksichtigungsfähige Verbindlichkeiten – Abänderungsantrag – Teilweise offensichtliche Unzulässigkeit – Art. 85 Abs. 3 der Verordnung Nr. 806/2014 – Unzuständigkeit des Urhebers der Handlung – Teilweise offensichtlich begründet CELEX:62025TJ0134_SUM: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 January 2026.#D S.A. v P S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Compensation to passengers in the event of a long delay or cancellation of a flight – Exemption – Extraordinary circumstances – Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Air traffic management decision – Allocation of delayed departure slots due to adverse weather conditions – Possibility of relying on a flight subsequent to that affected by the occurrence of an extraordinary circumstance.#Case T-134/25. CELEX:62025CO0358: Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#M.O.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Directive (UE) 2017/1132 – Publicité et actualisation des indications concernant les sociétés – Cessation des fonctions par des membres du conseil d’administration – Fondation – Inapplicabilité – Article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Absence de mise en œuvre du droit de l’Union – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-358/25. CELEX:62025TJ0069_SUM: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 February 2026.#A GmbH v Hauptzollamt C.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Common Customs Tariff – Tariff classification – Combined Nomenclature – Interpretation – Concept of ‘goods put up in sets’ consisting of two or more separate constituents – Note 3 to Section VI of Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87.#Case T-69/25. CELEX:62025CO0255_SUM: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 June 2026.#Technikes Anaktisis kai Diachorismou AE (ECORESET AE) v Perifereia Attikis.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Reply which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law – Private investment aid scheme – Aid scheme compatible with the internal market – Refusal by the competent authority to grant aid under that scheme – Legal action seeking annulment of that refusal decision – Retroactive effect of a possible judicial annulment of that refusal decision – Expiry, during the legal proceedings, of the period laid down for granting the aid under that aid scheme – Date on which the aid concerned is deemed to have been granted – Article 47 of the Charter of CELEX:62024TJ0689_SUM: Judgment of the General Court (Chamber giving preliminary rulings) of 11 February 2026.#I. S.A. v Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of VAT – Right to deduct input VAT – Article 167, Article 168(a) and Article 178(a) of Directive 2006/112/EC – Issuing of the invoice showing the VAT during the tax period following that in respect of which the right of deduction is exercised – Fiscal neutrality and proportionality.#Case T-689/24. CELEX:62024TJ0691_SUM: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 4 March 2026.#Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili v Heineken România S.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Common Customs Tariff – Combined Nomenclature – Tariff classification – Heading 2206 – Subheadings 2206 00 31, 2206 00 51, 2206 00 81 and 2206 00 39, 2206 00 59 – Beverages composed of fermented apple juice, in which the proportion of alcohol derived from plants other than apples is, depending on the type of beverage, equal at least to 48%, 50%, 51%, 52% or 53% in comparison with the alcohol obtained from the fermentation of apples and which have the organoleptic characteristics of cider.#Case T-69 CELEX:62023CJ0728_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union and Représentant spécial de l’Union européenne en Bosnie-Herzégovine.#Appeal – Staff coming under the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) – International contract staff member hired by the European Union Special Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina – Successive fixed-term employment contracts – Termination of the employment contract following the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union – Appeal brought by a Member State which did not intervene in the proceedings before the General Court – Third paragraph of Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Admissibility of the CELEX:62026CO0068_SUM: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 March 2026.#Criminal proceedings against DK.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Area of freedom, security and justice – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Article 8(1) and (2) – Right to be present at the trial – Express or tacit but unequivocal waiver – National legislation interpreted as allowing a person who is the subject of criminal prosecution to be kept in detention in order for his or her right to be present at the trial to be safeguarded.#Case C-68/26 PPU. CELEX:32026D1850: Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2026/1850 of 24 July 2026 implementing Decision 2011/235/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Iran CELEX:32026D04079: Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 15 June 2026 amending the Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament CELEX:32026R1851: Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1851 of 24 July 2026 implementing Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran CELEX:32026R1744: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 July 2026 amending Regulations (EU) 2024/1689, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2023/1230 as regards the simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) (Text with EEA relevance) CELEX:32026R1738: Regulation (EU) 2026/1738 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 July 2026 on circularity requirements for vehicle design and on management of end-of-life vehicles, amending Regulations (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2019/1020 and (EU) 2023/1542 and repealing Directives 2000/53/EC and 2005/64/EC (Text with EEA relevance) CELEX:62026CO0013: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Emilio De Capitani v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Working documents issued by the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union – No publication, in the Council’s register, of documents submitted following a request for access – Article 10 and Article 16(8) TEU – Article 15 TFEU – No implied refusal to publish – No challengeable act – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-13/26 P. CELEX:62025TO0005(01)_INF: Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 March 2026.#HD and Others v European Parliament and European External Action Service.#Case T-5/25. CELEX:62025TJ0555_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#OpenAI, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark OPENAI – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-555/25. CELEX:62025TO0734_INF: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 June 2026.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark CONTOUR FOAM – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-734/25. CELEX:62025TJ0105_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#Kutxabank, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark K. – Earlier EU figurative marks k and k kutxabank kredit – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Lack of similarity of the services – Lack of similarity of the signs – Cross-claim.#Case T-105/25. Comments are only visible to subscribers.