Admin MPS / ponedeljek, 05. januar 2026 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62025CB0040: Case C-40/25, CRIF: Order of the President of the Court of 30 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien – Austria) – CRIF GmbH v YO CELEX:62025CB0037: C-37/25, GTC Dijon: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 July 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil de Prud’hommes de Dole – France) – YH v S.E.L.A.S. GTC Dijon (Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de Dijon) (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Social policy – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Organisation of working time – Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 7(1) – Entitlement to paid annual leave – Purposes – Sick leave with no restrictions in terms of outings, enabling a worker to rest and enjoy leisure activities – Absence of loss of entitlements to paid annual leave) CELEX:62025CB0047: Case C-47/25, Apple Distribution International: Order of the President of the Court of 26 May 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the ondernemingsrechtbank Antwerpen, afdeling Antwerpen – Belgium) – LS v Apple Distribution International Ltd Print 4 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62024TJ0405: Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 18 mars 2026.#Samer Al Dibs contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises en raison de la situation en Syrie – Gel des fonds – Restrictions en matière d’admission sur le territoire des États membres – Listes des personnes, des entités et des organismes auxquels s’applique le gel des fonds et des ressources économiques et faisant l’objet de restrictions en matière d’admission sur le territoire des États membres – Maintien du nom du requérant sur les listes – Critère de la “femme ou de l’homme d’affaires influent exerçant ses activités en Syrie” – Présomption de lien avec le régime de Bachar al-Assad – Chute du régime de Bachar al-Assad – Obligation de motiv CELEX:62024TJ0531: Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 18 mars 2026.#e-motors contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure d’opposition – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne figurative EMOTORS – Marques de l’Union européenne figurative antérieure e-motors et nationale verbale antérieure emotors – Motif relatif de refus – Absence de risque de confusion – Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001.#Affaire T-531/24. CELEX:62025TJ0077: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 18 March 2026.#Debonair Trading Internacional Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark AOURA – Earlier EU word mark AURA LOEWE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-77/25. CELEX:62024CJ0541_INF: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Case C-541/24. CELEX:62025TJ0108: Arrêt du Tribunal (septième chambre) du 18 mars 2026.#MAN Truck & Bus SE contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Marque de l’Union européenne verbale V12X – Cause de nullité absolue – Caractère descriptif – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous c), et article 59, paragraphe 1, sous a), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Validité des éléments de preuve – Article 95, paragraphe 1, du règlement 2017/1001 – Éléments de preuve présentés pour la première fois devant la chambre de recours – Article 95, paragraphe 2, du règlement 2017/1001 – Article 27, paragraphe 4, du règlement délégué (UE) 2018/625 – Droit de propriété – Article 17 de la charte des droits fondamentaux.#Affaire T-108/25. CELEX:62022TJ0575_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 18 March 2026.#Robin Wood - Gewaltfreie Aktionsgemeinschaft für Natur und Umwelt eV and Others v European Commission.#Environment – Aarhus Convention – Rejection of request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 – Forest management – Activities relating to the production of fuels and bioenergy from forest biomass – Taxonomy – Requirements for technical screening criteria – Article 19 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 – Substantial contribution to climate change mitigation and adaptation – Significant harm to environmental objectives.#Case T-575/22. CELEX:62022TJ0575: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 18 March 2026.#Robin Wood - Gewaltfreie Aktionsgemeinschaft für Natur und Umwelt eV and Others v European Commission.#Environment – Aarhus Convention – Rejection of request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 – Forest management – Activities relating to the production of fuels and bioenergy from forest biomass – Taxonomy – Requirements for technical screening criteria – Article 19 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 – Substantial contribution to climate change mitigation and adaptation – Significant harm to environmental objectives.#Case T-575/22. CELEX:62025TJ0377: Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 18 mars 2026.#Effeemme Srl contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de déchéance – Marque de l’Union européenne figurative Gattinoni – Absence d’usage sérieux de la marque – Article 18 et article 58, paragraphe 1, sous a), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001.#Affaire T-377/25. CELEX:32024R1745R(09) CELEX:32026D0618: Council Decision (EU) 2026/618 of 16 March 2026 on the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the EU-Ukraine Association Council established by the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part, as regards the establishment of the Public Administration Reform Sub-Committee and the endorsement of the establishment of the Joint Consultative Committee between the European Committee of the Regions and the elected local and regional authorities of Ukraine CELEX:32026R0667: Regulation (EU) 2026/667 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2026 amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 as regards the setting of a Union intermediate climate target for 2040 CELEX:32023R0988R(04) CELEX:32025R1494R(04) CELEX:32025R0327R(02) CELEX:62024CJ0008_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 March 2026.##Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Regulation (EU) 2018/1805 – Article 1(1) and (4) – Confiscation order issued in criminal proceedings – Point 2 of Article 2 and point 3(a) and (d) of Article 2 – Confiscation in relation to a criminal offence, but without a final conviction – Confiscation order imposed in a judgment of acquittal finding that the goods to be confiscated are the product of a criminal offence other than the offence giving rise to that judgment and in which offence persons other than the defendants acquitted were involved – No indictment against those persons – Article 19(1)(h) – Grounds for non-recognition and no CELEX:62024CJ0008: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 March 2026.##Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Regulation (EU) 2018/1805 – Article 1(1) and (4) – Confiscation order issued in criminal proceedings – Point 2 of Article 2 and point 3(a) and (d) of Article 2 – Confiscation in relation to a criminal offence, but without a final conviction – Confiscation order imposed in a judgment of acquittal finding that the goods to be confiscated are the product of a criminal offence other than the offence giving rise to that judgment and in which offence persons other than the defendants acquitted were involved – No indictment against those persons – Article 19(1)(h) – Grounds for non-recognition and non-ex CELEX:62024CJ0258_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 March 2026.#Katholische Schwangerschaftsberatung v JB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Occupational activities within churches and other organisations the ethos of which is based on religion or belief – Associating providing counselling on pregnancy to pregnant women – Occupational requirements – Acting in good faith and with loyalty to the ethos of the church or organisation – Difference of treatment on grounds of religion or belief – Dismissal of a worker on the ground of her leaving the Catholic church.#Case C-258/24. CELEX:62024CJ0258: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 March 2026.#Katholische Schwangerschaftsberatung v JB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Occupational activities within churches and other organisations the ethos of which is based on religion or belief – Associating providing counselling on pregnancy to pregnant women – Occupational requirements – Acting in good faith and with loyalty to the ethos of the church or organisation – Difference of treatment on grounds of religion or belief – Dismissal of a worker on the ground of her leaving the Catholic church.#Case C-258/24. CELEX:32019R0877R(03) CELEX:32026D0580: Council Decision (EU) 2026/580 of 24 November 2025 on the signing and conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation establishing a framework for the participation of the Swiss Confederation in European Union crisis management operations Comments are only visible to subscribers.