Related articles

• CELEX:62025CJ0010_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Elettronica Industriale SpA v Ministero delle Imprese e del Made in Italy.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications networks and services – Directive 2002/20/EC – Article 13 – Fees for rights of use for digital television frequencies – Directive 2002/21/EC – Article 8 – General objectives – Proportionality – Criterion for assessing fees linked to the collection of a predetermined amount of annual revenue with a financial objective.#Case C-10/25.
• CELEX:62026TO0410: __[no-tr-for:ord-t]__ of 14 August 2026.#UM v Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – No need to adjudicate.#Case T-410/26 R.
• CELEX:62023CJ0307_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#G GmbH v Hauptzollamt H.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Community Customs Code – Import and export procedures – Determining the customs value – Article 32(1)(a)(ii) and (b)(iv) – Adjustment depending on costs incurred by the buyer – Costs arising from intangible services for the design of templates for labels affixed on food cans – Concept of ‘container’ – Intangible services within the European Union.#Case C-307/23.
• CELEX:62024CJ0408_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#Republik Österreich v Austrian Airlines AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 – Single European sky – Regulation (EC) No 550/2004 – Provision of air navigation services in the single European sky – Article 8 – Air traffic service providers – Articles 14 and 15 – Charges payable by airspace users – Failure of an aeronautical telecommunications server – Cancellation of flights – Alleged culpable negligence on the part of the provider concerned – Airspace users – Protection of those users against the material damage caused by such negligence.#Case C-408/24.
• CELEX:62024CJ0744_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#P.W. v Bank Polska Kasa Opieki S.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Credit agreements for consumers – Directive 2008/48/EC – Article 3(j) – Article 10(2)(f) – The concept of ‘borrowing rate’ – The concept of ‘amount of credit drawn down’ – Article 3(g) – The concept of ‘total cost of the credit to the consumer’ – Charging interest on an amount corresponding to the cost of the credit – Insurance premium.#Case C-744/24.
• CELEX:62023CJ0727_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#PB v Single Resolution Board (SRB).#Appeal – Civil service – Conditions of Employment of Other Servants – Members of the temporary staff – Decision not to reclassify – Possibility for the administration to supplement before the Courts of the European Union the statement of reasons for the decision not to reclassify – Conditions – Exceptional cases – Principle of correspondence between the administrative complaint and the subsequent action – Action for annulment.#Case C-727/23 P.
• CELEX:62025CJ0052_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 May 2026.#RZ and Others v Région wallonne.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Mons.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Block exemption for certain types of aid to the agriculture and forestry sectors – Regulation (EU) No 702/2014 – Aid intended to compensate for damage caused by adverse climatic events which can be assimilated to a natural disaster – Reduction of the amount of aid in the event of failure to take out insurance covering at least 50% of the beneficiary’s average annual production or production-related income and the most frequent climatic risks in the Member State or region concerned – Article 25(9) – Impossibility for the beneficiary of the aid to take out the required in
• CELEX:62024CJ0590_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 January 2026.#Criminal proceedings against AK Dlhopolec s.r.o. and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement procedures – Directive 2014/23 – Award of concession contracts – Directive 2014/24 – Grounds for exclusion – National legislation establishing a register of public sector partners – Requirement of impartiality on the part of the person authorised to enter the public sector partner in that register – Imposition of a fine for non-compliance with that requirement – Automatic exclusion from participation in public procurement procedures in the event of non-payment of that fine – Article 49 of the Charter of Fundamental Rig
• CELEX:62025CJ0301_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 April 2026.#Lidl Italia Srl v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices – Directive 2005/29/EC – Scope – Relationship between the provisions of that directive and other EU rules regulating specific aspects of unfair commercial practices – Article 3(4) – Unfair food information practices – Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 – Whether there is a conflict – Complementary nature of systems of protection.#Case C-301/25.
• CELEX:62024CJ0489_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) – Procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Possibility to extend the six-month time limit for taking a decision in the event of a large number of applications for international protection lodged simultaneously – Successive extension decisions – Conditions and limits – Article 4(1) – Obligation for Member States to ensure that the determining authority is provided with appropriate means to carry out its tasks.#Case C-489/24.
• CELEX:62024CJ0210_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Asociación de Empresas de Servicios para la Dependencia (AESTE) v Ayuntamiento de Ortuella.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Contract for social services without accommodation – Contract with a value below the threshold for that directive to apply – Article 67 – Award criteria of a social nature – Most economically advantageous tender – Salary increase of staff performing the contract above the salary level provided for in the sectoral collective agreement – Connection with the subject matter of the contract – Proportionality and non-discrimination – Article 28 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to negotiate by collective agreement.#
• CELEX:62026CO0278_INF: Order of the Court of 30 June 2026.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-278/26 P.
• CELEX:62025TO0844_INF: Order of the President of the General Court of 22 June 2026.#Biohaven Bioscience Ireland Ltd and Biohaven Therapeutics Ltd v European Medicines Agency.#Interim relief – Medicinal products for human use – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Withdrawal of the application for marketing authorisation for Dazluma – Publication of the assessment report – Application for suspension of operation – Prima facie case – Urgency – Weighing up of interests.#Case T-844/25 R.
• CELEX:62025TJ0030_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#HI v European Parliament.#Civil service – Officials – Reports procedure – 2022 appraisal procedure – Staff report – Impartiality – Duty of care – Protection of personal data – Article 43 of the Staff Regulations – Internal rules on staff reports – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-30/25.
• CELEX:62024TJ0084_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 April 2026.#UU v Court of Justice of the European Union.#Case T-84/24.
• CELEX:62025TO0505_INF:           Ordonnance du président du Tribunal du 12 mai 2026.#Ivan Sammut contre Commission européenne.#Référé – Marchés publics de services – Prestation de services de traduction – Demande de mesures provisoires – Méconnaissance des exigences de forme – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-505/25 R.
• CELEX:62024TO0247_INF: Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 May 2026.#Evroins inshurans grup AD v European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority.#Action for annulment – Economic and monetary policy – Request to initiate an investigation – Refusal by EIOPA – Decision of the Board of Appeal to dismiss the appeal as inadmissible – Manifest lack of jurisdiction in part – Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-247/24.
• CELEX:62024CJ0899_INF: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 April 2026.#HG v European Commission.#Case C-899/24 P.
• CELEX:62025TO0214_INF: Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 February 2026.#IR v Council of the European Union.#Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Downgrading in the same function group – Unauthorised engagement in outside activities – Article 10 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-214/25.
• CELEX:62023TJ0328_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 February 2026.#Radical-Consulting UG and Others v European High-Performance Computing Joint Undertaking.#Research and technological development – Horizon Europe Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027) – High-performance computing applications – Call for proposals with a view to the award of a grant – Decision rejecting a proposal – Decision rejecting the request for an evaluation review – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of transparency – Equal treatment – Article 30 of Regulation (EU) 2021/695.#Case T-328/23.