Related articles

• CELEX:62024CJ0484: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#NTH Haustechnik GmbH v EM.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5(1)(e) – Storage limitation – Point (e) of the first subparagraph of Article 6 – Lawfulness of processing such data relating to a contract of employment in judicial proceedings – Article 17(3)(e) – No obligation to erase such data where processing is necessary for the establishment, exercise or defence of legal claims – Data collected by the employer with a view to proving a serious failure by the employee to comply with his or her obligations – Use of evidence obtained unlawfully.#Case C-484/24.
• CELEX:62025CC0550: Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 18 June 2026.###
• CELEX:62025TO0654_INF: Order of the President of the General Court of 26 March 2026.#Stanislav Dobrinov Stoyanov v Council of the European Union.#Case T-654/25 R.
• CELEX:62024CJ0575: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#Vodovody a kanalizace Přerov, a.s. v Úřad pro ochranu osobních údajů.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Open data and the re-use of public sector information – Directive (EU) 2019/1024 – Article 2(3) – Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice – Concept of ‘public undertaking’ – Undertaking owned by several public sector bodies – Presumption of ‘dominant influence’ – Criteria for assessment.#Case C-575/24.
• CELEX:62024CJ0658: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#Penny Market Kft. v Komárom-Esztergom Vármegyei Kormányhivatal.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Common organisation of the markets in agricultural products – Services in the internal market – National legislation imposing an obligation, for a specified period, on retailers of foodstuffs with a turnover in excess of a certain amount, to reduce the prices of certain foodstuffs and to have minimum quantities of those foodstuffs in stock – Measure taken as a result of a situation of emergency – Fines.#Case C-658/24.
• CELEX:62024CJ0880:           Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 18 juin 2026.#VK contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Agent temporaire – Statut des fonctionnaires de l’Union européenne – Article 77 – Article 11, paragraphe 2, de l’annexe VIII – Article 5, paragraphe 1, sixième alinéa, des dispositions générales d’exécution des articles 11 et 12 de l’annexe VIII du statut relatifs au transfert de droits à pension – Pension d’ancienneté – Droits à pension acquis avant l’entrée au service de l’Union européenne – Délai dans lequel une demande de transfert vers le régime de pensions des institutions de l’Union doit être présentée – Rejet de la demande de transfert présentée hors délai – Circonstances exceptionnelles – Pandémie de COVID‑19.#Affaire C-880/24 P.
• CELEX:62025CC0395: Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 18 June 2026.###
• CELEX:62024CJ0522: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#BG v Ministero della Difesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Article 1 – Purpose – Article 2(2)(a) and (b) – Prohibition of discrimination on the ground of belief – National legislation requiring military personnel to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 – Difference in treatment based on membership of a particular professional category – Concept of ‘belief’.#Case C-522/24.
• CELEX:62025TJ0471_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark NAVIGATE – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-471/25.
• CELEX:62025TJ0106_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 March 2026.#Pols Erm Tarim Anonim Sirketi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Pol’s FREEZE FRESH – Earlier EU figurative marks PAUL depuis 1889 and PAUL LE CAFE – Relative ground for refusal – Detriment to the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Link between the marks at issue.#Case T-106/25.
• CELEX:62025CC0185: Opinion of Advocate General Norkus delivered on 18 June 2026.###
• CELEX:62024CC0138:           Conclusions de l'avocate générale Mme J. Kokott, présentées le 18 juin 2026.###
• CELEX:62025CC0241: Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 18 June 2026.###
• CELEX:62025CJ0232: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#Z.R. and Ś. v U. and Z.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 – Jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Article 5(3) – Special jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict – Place where the harmful event occurred or may occur – Natural and legal persons claiming breach of their personality rights as a result of the broadcast of audiovisual content on television and on the internet – International jurisdiction of the courts of a Member State other than the Member State where that content was produced – Place where the damage occurred – Centre of interests of those persons – Content
• CELEX:62024CJ0376: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#MT v Comité de direction de l’Autorité des Services et des Marchés Financiers (FSMA).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2003/6/EC – Article 3 – Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 – Article 10 – Unlawful disclosure of inside information – Insider dealing and market abuse – Financial services – Article 21 – Disclosure or dissemination of information in the media – Disclosure of inside information in the media by a politician – Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed at Rome on 4 November 1950 – Article 10 – Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Freedom of expression – Article 52(1) and (3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Interpretation and limitation on t
• CELEX:62025TO0653_INF: Order of the President of the General Court of 26 March 2026.#MS and Others v Council of the European Union.#Case T-653/25 R.
• CELEX:62024TJ0183_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#DP and DQ v European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority.#Action for damages – Non-contractual liability of the European Union – Origin of the dispute – Limitation period – Admissibility – Article 339 TFEU – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of good administration – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-183/24.
• CELEX:62024CC0582: Opinion of Advocate General Norkus delivered on 18 June 2026.###
• CELEX:62024CJ0522_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#BG v Ministero della Difesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Article 1 – Purpose – Article 2(2)(a) and (b) – Prohibition of discrimination on the ground of belief – National legislation requiring military personnel to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 – Difference in treatment based on membership of a particular professional category – Concept of ‘belief’.#Case C-522/24.
• CELEX:62024CJ0414: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#Datenschutzbehörde and Dr. G S v Bundesministerin für Justiz and D GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Articles 77 and 79 – Remedies – Parallel exercise – Relationship between the lodging of a complaint with a national supervisory authority and the exercise of a judicial remedy – Risk of contradictory decisions – Principle of effective judicial protection – Procedural autonomy of the Member States – Principle of effectiveness – Principle of equivalence.#Case C-414/24.