Admin MPS / sobota, 03. oktober 2026 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62024TJ0500_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2026.#Asociación de investigación para la industria del calzado y conexas (Inescop) v European Commission.#Case T-500/24. CELEX:62024TJ0500: Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 9 septembre 2026.#Asociación de investigación para la industria del calzado y conexas (Inescop) contre Commission européenne.#Clause compromissoire – Septième programme-cadre pour des actions de recherche, de développement technologique et de démonstration (2007‑2013) – Conventions de subvention relatives aux projets DES‑MOLD, Sohealthy et PILOT‑ABP – Coûts éligibles – Enquête de l’OLAF – Demande de recouvrement et de dommages et intérêts – Note de débit – Recours en annulation – Acte non susceptible de recours – Actes s’inscrivant dans un cadre purement contractuel dont ils sont indissociables – Irrecevabilité – Prescription – Délai raisonnable – Article 41, paragraphe 4, de la charte des droits fondamentaux.#Affaire T CELEX:62024TJ0501: Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 9 septembre 2026.#Cluster Calzado Innovación contre Commission européenne.#Clause compromissoire – Septième programme-cadre pour des actions de recherche, de développement technologique et de démonstration (2007‑2013) – Convention de subvention relative au projet Sohealthy – Coûts éligibles – Enquête de l’OLAF – Demande de recouvrement et de dommages et intérêts – Note de débit – Recours en annulation – Acte non susceptible de recours – Actes s’inscrivant dans un cadre purement contractuel dont ils sont indissociables – Irrecevabilité – Prescription – Délai raisonnable – Article 41, paragraphe 4, de la charte des droits fondamentaux.#Affaire T-501/24. Print 6 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62024CO0667_INF: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 October 2026.#YP v AMCO - Asset Management Company SpA et pour son compte IFIS NPL Servicing SpA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Brindisi.#Case C-667/24. CELEX:62025CO0842: Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 19 octobre 2026.#Investcapital Ltd contre PG.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Réponse pouvant être clairement déduite de la jurisprudence – Directive 93/13/CEE – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Article 6, paragraphe 1, et article 7, paragraphe 1 – Contrat de carte de crédit – Procédure d’injonction de payer – Contrôle d’office du caractère abusif des clauses contractuelles – Principe d’effectivité – Proposition du juge national de réduire la créance du montant lié à l’application d’une clause potentiellement abusive – Participation du consommateur au contrôle du caractère potentiellement abusif d’une clause.#Affaire C-842/25. CELEX:32026D2360: Council Decision (EU) 2026/2360 of 1 October 2026 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation on the transfer of Passenger Name Record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime CELEX:62025TA0614: Case T-614/25, Trading 4: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 9 September 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) – Latvia) – AS Trading 4 v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of valued added tax (VAT) – Exemptions for intra-community transactions – Exemption related to the supply of goods – Article 138(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC – Exemptions for intra-Community acquisitions of goods – Article 141 of Directive 2006/112 – Chain of supplies with a single intra-Community transport – Triangular transaction – Ascription of the transport – Transport under an excise duty suspension arrangement – Transfer of the right to dispose of goods to the person acq CELEX:62026TN0495: Case T-495/26: Action brought on 31 July 2026 – AB Azucarera Iberia v Commission CELEX:62026TN0529: Case T-529/26: Action brought on 10 August 2026 – Crédit agricole and Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank v Commission CELEX:62026TN0559: Case T-559/26: Action brought on 24 August 2026 – VH v Commission CELEX:62026TN0601: Case T-601/26: Action brought on 9 September 2026 – Laurieri v EUIPO – Morato Pane (Morato PANE & IDEE SCRIKKI) CELEX:62026TN0583: Case T-583/26: Action brought on 2 September 2026 – Hesse v EUIPO – Carrera (Carrera) CELEX:62022TA0348: Case T-348/22: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2026 – PT Indonesia Ruipu Nickel and Chrome Alloy v Commission (Commercial policy – Subsidies – Imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in Indonesia – Definitive countervailing duty – Regional specificity – Article 4(3) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 – Calculation of the benefit – Articles 6 and 7 of Regulation 2016/1037 – Non-cooperation and use of the facts available – Article 28 of Regulation 2016/1037 – WTO law) CELEX:62025CA0147: Case C-147/25, Inter Rao Lietuva: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 September 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas – Lithuania) – Inter Rao Lietuva AB v Finansinių nusikaltimų tyrimo tarnyba prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 2(1) – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 2(1) – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – National measure providing for the freezing of funds and economic resources belonging to a legal person owing to the existence of links with a person sanctioned by the Eur CELEX:62024CA0293: Case C-293/24, Ferreira da Silva e Brito and Others: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 September 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça – Portugal) – João Filipe Ferreira da Silva e Brito and Others v Estado Português (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directives 77/187/EEC and 2001/23/EC – Transfers of undertakings – Safeguarding of employees’ rights – Article 1(1) and Article 3(1) – Obligation to make a request for a preliminary ruling under the third paragraph of Article 267 TFEU – Member State liability for harm caused to individuals by breaches of EU law attributable to that Member State – Breaches attributable to a national court or tribunal against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under national law – Tak CELEX:62024CA0498: Case C-498/24 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 September 2026 – Çolakoğlu Metalurji AŞ, Çolakoğlu Dış Ticaret AŞ v European Commission (Appeal – Dumping – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1100 – Imports of certain hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel originating in Türkiye – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Comparison between the export price and the normal value – Adjustments – Article 2(10)(i) – Commissions – Functions similar to those of an agent working on a commission basis – Single economic entity – Criteria – Rules of evidence – Article 2(10)(j) – Conversion of currencies – Exchange rate applicable – Foreign currency risk hedging contract) CELEX:62024CA0499: Case C-499/24 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 September 2026 – Ereğli Demir ve Çelik Fabrikaları TAŞ, İskenderun Demir ve Çelik AŞ, Erdemir Çelik Servis Merkezi Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Commission (Appeal – Dumping – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1100 – Imports of certain hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel originating in Türkiye – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Calculation of the normal value – Fair comparison – Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Article 2(5) – Article 2(10)(j) – Adjustments – Conversion of currencies – Hedging gains and losses – Article 18(3) and (6) – Cooperation of the interested parties) CELEX:62026CB0052: (Removal from the register): Order of the Court of 22 July 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo – Portugal) – Bourbon Offshore Interoil Shipping – Navegação Lda, v Autoridade Tributária e Assuntos Fiscais da Região Autónoma da Madeira (Case C-52/26, Bourbon Offshore Interoil Shipping) CELEX:62026TN0572: Case T-572/26: Action brought on 28 August 2026 – Vlah v Council CELEX:62025CB0641: Case C-641/25, Łęko: Order of the President of the Ninth Chamber of the Court of 30 July 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie – Poland) – Bank BPH S.A. v AKS, BS CELEX:62026CB0446: Case C-446/26 PPU, Blerens: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 July 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the rechtbank Amsterdam – Netherlands) in proceedings relating to the execution of a European arrest warrant issued in respect of RI (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of conducting a criminal prosecution or executing custodial sentences – Article 6(1) – Issuing judicial authority – Article 8(1)(c) – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office on the basis of a national a CELEX:62026TB0131: Case T-131/26, Europark Estonia: Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 September 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tallinna Halduskohus – Estonia) – Europark Estonia OÜ v Maksu- ja Tolliamet (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 226 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Reply which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law – Taxation – Common system of VAT – Scope – Taxable transactions – Supply of services for consideration – Article 2(1)(c) of Directive 2006/112/EC – Activities carried out by a company incorporated under private law – Operation of car parks on private land – Contractual penalties levied by that company in the event of non-compliance with the general terms and conditions for use of those car parks – Charact CELEX:62024TA0500: Case T-500/24: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2026 – Inescop v Commission (Arbitration clause – Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) – Grant agreements for the DES-MOLD, Sohealthy and PILOT-APB projects – Eligible costs – OLAF investigation – Order for recovery and for damages – Debit note – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Acts falling within a purely contractual framework from which they are inseparable – Inadmissibility – Limitation period – Reasonable time limit – Article 41(4) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights) Comments are only visible to subscribers.