Admin MPS / sreda, 08. april 2026 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62024CO0861_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#MB v Societatea Națională [U].#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanţa.#Case C-861/24. CELEX:62024CO0861: Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 12 février 2026.#MB contre contre contre Societatea Națională [U].#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Politique sociale – Directive (UE) 2019/1158 – Protection contre le licenciement – Dispositions nationales plus favorables à la protection de la sécurité et de la santé des travailleurs – Congé parental – Réglementation nationale prévoyant une interdiction générale et absolue de licencier un travailleur bénéficiant de l’aide à l’insertion – Article 16 et article 17, paragraphe 1, de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Absence de mise en œuvre du droit de l’Union – Incompétence manifeste de la Cour.#Affaire C-861/24. CELEX:62024CO0865(01): Ordonnance du président de la Cour du 1er août 2025.#Ordre néerlandais des avocats du barreau de Bruxelles e.a. contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Demande d’intervention – Association professionnelle – Intérêt à la solution du litige – Admission.#Affaire C-865/24 P. Print 1 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62026CD0167: Decision of the Court of Justice (Reviewing Chamber) of 26 March 2026.##Review.#Case C-167/26 RX. CELEX:62025TJ0301_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 March 2026.#Dariusz Kowalski v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark FLAMBIT – Earlier national word mark flambriks – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-301/25. CELEX:62025TO0447_INF: Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 February 2026.#jundado GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-447/25. CELEX:62024TJ0628_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Lego A/S v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a building block from a toy building set – Earlier EU design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – No different overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-628/24. CELEX:62025TJ0055_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 March 2026.#Weight Doctors GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-55/25. CELEX:62025TJ0411_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#Raquel Maresma Bernal v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-411/25. CELEX:62025TJ0108_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 March 2026.#MAN Truck & Bus SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-108/25. CELEX:32012R0528R(15) CELEX:32019L1023R(03) CELEX:32015R0848R(07) CELEX:62024TJ0517_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Froneri Bulgaria EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a box with a lid – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Different overall impression – Novelty – Articles 5 and 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822.#Case T-517/24. CELEX:62024CJ0126_INF: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 January 2026.#Uno Organización Empresarial de Logística y Transporte v European Commission.#Case C-126/24 P. CELEX:62025CO0423_INF: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2025.#MW v Slovak Telekom a.s.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Prešov.#Case C-423/25. CELEX:62025CO0532_INF: Order of the Court of 27 November 2025.#Delta-Sport Handelskontor GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case C-532/25 P. CELEX:62025CO0373_INF: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 November 2025.#Roata SRL, par liquidateur Braudit SPRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală and Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Braşov.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia.#Case C-373/25. CELEX:62025CO0590_INF: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 30 October 2025.#Alireza Malekzadeh Arasteh v European Commission.#Appeal – Interim relief – Actions for damages – Request for the initiation of infringement proceedings against the Kingdom of Sweden – Decision of the European Commission rejecting that request – Damage allegedly suffered by the appellant – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-590/25 P(R). CELEX:62025CO0637_INF: Ordonnance du Vice-président de la Cour du 14 octobre 2025.#Rimorchiatori Riuniti Panfido & C. Srl contre Agence exécutive européenne pour le climat, les infrastructures et l’environnement (CINEA).#Pourvoi – Article 58 bis du statut de la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne – Article 170 bis, paragraphe 1, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Exigences formelles relatives au pourvoi – Demande d’admission du pourvoi présentée hors délai – Irrecevabilité du pourvoi.#Affaire C-637/25 P. CELEX:62025CO0433_INF: Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d'admission des pourvois) du 15 décembre 2025.#bonnanwalt Vermögens- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande d’admission ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non‑admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-433/25 P. CELEX:62025CO0365_INF: Order of the Court of 2 December 2025.#Giuliani SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-365/25 P. CELEX:62024CJ0124_INF: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 January 2026.#Asociación Profesional de Empresas de Reparto y Manipulado de Correspondencia (Asempre) v European Commission.#Case C-124/24 P. Comments are only visible to subscribers.