Admin MPS / sreda, 29. oktober 2025 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62024CO0640_INF: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2025.#Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri v SX and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Case C-640/24. CELEX:62024CO0640: Ordonnance de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 2 mai 2025.#Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri contre SX e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Réponse pouvant être clairement déduite de la jurisprudence – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Directive 2004/80/CE – Article 12, paragraphe 2 – Régimes nationaux d’indemnisation des victimes de la criminalité intentionnelle violente – Crime d’homicide – Indemnisation des membres de la famille proches de la personne décédée – Régime d’indemnisation “en cascade” selon l’ordre de dévolution successorale – Réglementation nationale subordonnant le versement d’une indemnité aux frères et sœurs de la personne décédée à l’absence de conjoint survivant, d’enfants ainsi que des paren CELEX:62024CO0656: Ordonnance de la Cour (septième chambre) du 28 avril 2025.#U.T.G. Prefettura di Bari et Autorità nazionale anticorruzione (ANAC) contre Dmeco Engineering Srl e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Liberté d’entreprise – Liberté d’établissement – Situation purement interne – Exigence d’indication des raisons justifiant la nécessité d’une réponse par la Cour – Exigence d’indication du lien existant entre les dispositions de droit de l’Union dont l’interprétation est demandée et la législation nationale applicable – Absence de précisions suffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-656/24. Print 7 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62023CJ0811_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#European Commission v Zippo Manufacturing Co. and Zippo GmbH.#Appeal – Commercial policy – Commercial policy measures concerning certain products originating in the United States of America – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/502 – Measures adopted by the United States of America on imports of certain derivative aluminium and steel products – European Union decision to suspend equivalent trade concessions and other obligations – Additional customs duties on imports of products originating in the United States – Article 41(2)(a) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of good administration – Right to be heard – Principle of ne ultra petita.#Case C-811/23 P. CELEX:62025TO0251: Ordonnance du Tribunal (neuvième chambre) du 19 mars 2026.#Grzegorz Mordalski contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Enregistrement ayant expiré – Recours manifestement dépourvu de tout fondement en droit.#Affaire T-251/25. CELEX:62023CJ0678_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#JU v Spitalul Clinic de Pneumoftiziologie Iaşi.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Iaşi.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 89/391/EEC – Safety and health of workers at work – Article 9 – Employers’ obligations – Classification of workplaces according to whether they are exposing workers to risk factors to their safety and health – Article 11(6) – Proceedings before the authority responsible for safety and health protection at work – Effective judicial protection.#Case C-678/23. CELEX:62024CJ0168_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#PMJC SAS v [W] [X] and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 12(2)(b) – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Article 20(b) – Grounds for revocation of a mark – Trade mark liable to mislead the public as a result of the use made of it – Trade mark corresponding to the name of a fashion designer – Assignment of the trade mark – Use of the trade mark in such a way as to make the public actually believe that the designer is still involved in the design of the goods bearing the trade mark – Misled belief.#Case C-168/24. CELEX:62025TO0917: Ordonnance du Tribunal (deuxième chambre, siégeant avec cinq juges) du 18 mars 2026.#R***** contre W***** H*****.#Radiation.#Affaire T-917/25. CELEX:62024TO0610: Ordonnance du Tribunal (deuxième chambre) du 17 mars 2026.#Banco Santander, SA contre Banque centrale européenne.#Recours en annulation – Politique économique et monétaire – Surveillance prudentielle des établissements de crédit – Règlement (UE) no 575/2013 – Déductibilité d’actifs d’impôts différés – Acte susceptible de recours.#Affaire T-610/24. CELEX:32026R0697: Regulation (EU) 2026/697 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2026 on cooperation among enforcement authorities responsible for the enforcement of Directive (EU) 2019/633 on unfair trading practices in business-to-business relationships in the agricultural and food supply chain CELEX:32026L0706: Directive (EU) 2026/706 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2026 amending Directive 2014/32/EU as regards measuring systems for electric vehicle supply equipment and compressed gas dispensers, and electricity, gas and thermal energy meters (Text with EEA relevance) CELEX:32026D0711: Council Decision (EU) 2026/711 of 16 March 2026 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Council of Members of the International Olive Council (IOC) as regards the trade standard for olive oils and olive pomace oils and a new method of analysis for determining the peroxide value in such oils CELEX:32017R1001R(10) CELEX:32026D0710: Council Decision (EU) 2026/710 of 16 March 2026 on the position to be adopted on behalf of the Union within the EU-Republic of Moldova Association Council established by the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Moldova, of the other part, as regards the establishment of the Public Administration Reform Sub-Committee and the endorsement of the establishment of the Joint Consultative Committee between the Committee of the Regions of the European Union and the elected local authorities of the Republic of Moldova CELEX:32026D0714: Council Decision (EU) 2026/714 of 17 March 2026 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union at the 237th session of the Council of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) as regards the adoption of the amendment to Annex 13 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation CELEX:32025R2033R(05) CELEX:62024CJ0373_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#NI v Republika Hrvatska.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Općinski sud u Puli-Pola.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2003/88/EC – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Article 1(3) – Article 2(1) – Concept of ‘working time’ – Activities of public prosecutors – Directive 89/391/EEC – Article 2(2) – Characteristics peculiar to certain specific public service activities – Periods of time on stand-by at the workplace and periods of time on stand-by according to a stand-by system carried out outside of the workplace – Article 31 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Fair and just working conditions.#Case C-373/24. CELEX:62024CJ0526: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 March 2026.#Brillen Rottler GmbH & Co. KG v TC.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 12(5) – Article 15(1) – Data subject’s right of access to the personal data concerning him or her – Controller’s right to refuse to act on the request for access – Excessive character of the request – Abuse of rights – First request for access – Right to compensation and liability – Article 82(1) – Action based on infringement of the right of access – Non-material damage – Loss of control over personal data.#Case C-526/24. CELEX:62024CJ0589: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 March 2026.#Almirall BV and Almirall SA v Infinity Pharma BV and Pharmaline BV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Scope – Article 2(1) – Medicinal products prepared industrially or manufactured by a method involving an industrial process – Article 3(2) – Medicinal products prepared in a pharmacy in accordance with the prescriptions of a pharmacopoeia and intended to be supplied directly to the patients served by the pharmacy in question – Exclusion from the directive’s scope – National regulation subjecting the latter medicinal products to an authorisation requirement on the basis of a numerical criterion.#Case C-589/24. CELEX:62023CJ0649: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 March 2026.#Institutul de Istorie şi Teorie Literară „G. Călinescu” and Fundaţia Naţională pentru Ştiinţă şi Artă v HK, en qualité d'héritier de TB and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 2001/29/EC – Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society – Reproduction right – Article 2(a) – Concept of a ‘work’ – Protection of works by copyright – Conditions – Directive 2006/116/EC – Article 5 – Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works – Article 2 – Critical edition of a pre-existing work the purpose of which is to restore a Latin manuscript – Intellectual creation reflecting the personality of its author, by expressing th CELEX:62024CJ0178: Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 19 mars 2026.#Mainova AG et enercity AG contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Concurrence – Règlement (CE) no 139/2004 – Concentration d’entreprises – Marchés allemands de l’électricité et du gaz – Acquisition par E.ON SE d’actifs de distribution et de commerce de RWE AG – Décision déclarant la concentration compatible avec le marché intérieur et le fonctionnement de l’accord sur l’Espace économique européen, du 2 mai 1992.#Affaires jointes C-178/24 P et C-179/24 P. CELEX:62024CJ0870_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 19 mars 2026.#Valsts ieņēmumu dienests contre SIA „OUTLETICO”.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Aides d’État – Règlement (UE) no 651/2014 – Catégories d’aides pouvant être considérées comme compatibles avec le marché intérieur – Exemption prévue pour les aides en faveur des petites et moyennes entreprises – Article 1er de l’annexe I – Notion d’“entreprise” – Article 3, paragraphe 3, de l’annexe I – Notion d’“entreprises liées” – Personne physique détenant une majorité des droits de vote associés aux actions d’une entreprise – Exercice d’une activité économique – Exercice effectif de contrôle par l’immixtion directe ou indirecte dans la gestion de l’entreprise.#Affaire C-870/24. CELEX:62025CO0564: Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 12 mars 2026.#FL contre Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération judiciaire en matière pénale (Eurojust) et Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération des services répressifs (Europol).#Pourvoi – Article 181 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Coopération des autorités de police et autres services répressifs des États membres – Article 340 TFUE – Règlement (UE) 2016/794 – Article 50, paragraphe 1 – Responsabilité non contractuelle de l’Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération des services répressifs (Europol) – Prétendu traitement illicite de données à caractère personnel transmises à Europol par des autorités nationales – Réalité du préjudice prétendument subi – Pourvoi en partie manifesteme Comments are only visible to subscribers.