Admin MPS / ponedeljek, 25. maj 2026 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62024CO0491_INF: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM) v Amazon Italia Services Srl and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Case C-491/24. CELEX:62024CO0491: Ordonnance de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 18 décembre 2025.#Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM) contre Amazon Italia Services Srl e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Réponse pouvant être clairement déduite de la jurisprudence – Concurrence – Article 101 TFUE – Interdiction des ententes – Dotation des autorités nationales de concurrence de moyens pour la mise en œuvre des règles de concurrence – Directive (UE) 2019/1 – Indépendance des autorités nationales de concurrence – Article 4, paragraphe 5 – Fixation des priorités pour les procédures relatives à la mise en œuvre des articles 101 et 102 TFUE – Amendes infligées aux entreprises et aux associations d’entreprises – Article 13 – Procédures d’infract CELEX:62024CO0501_INF: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 May 2025.#Klinka-Geo Trans Földmunkavégző Ipari, Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Case C-501/24. Print 4 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62026CO0013: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Emilio De Capitani v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Working documents issued by the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union – No publication, in the Council’s register, of documents submitted following a request for access – Article 10 and Article 16(8) TEU – Article 15 TFEU – No implied refusal to publish – No challengeable act – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-13/26 P. CELEX:62025TO0005(01)_INF: Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 March 2026.#HD and Others v European Parliament and European External Action Service.#Case T-5/25. CELEX:62025TJ0555_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#OpenAI, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark OPENAI – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-555/25. CELEX:62025TO0734_INF: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 June 2026.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark CONTOUR FOAM – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-734/25. CELEX:62025TJ0105_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#Kutxabank, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark K. – Earlier EU figurative marks k and k kutxabank kredit – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Lack of similarity of the services – Lack of similarity of the signs – Cross-claim.#Case T-105/25. CELEX:62025CO0168_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 February 2026.#Bytové družstvo so sídlom v Trnave v Prima banka Slovensko, a.s.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Trnave.#Case C-168/25. CELEX:62025CO0565_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#CW v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation and European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Case C-565/25 P. CELEX:62024TJ0037_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 December 2025.#CB v European Commission.#Case T-37/24. CELEX:62026TO0017: Order of the President of the General Court of 22 July 2026.#Indra Sistemas, SA v European External Action Service.#Interim measures – Public procurement – Negotiated tender procedure – Sole tenderer – Rejection of the tender – Application for suspension of operation and interim measures – No urgency.#Case T-17/26 R. CELEX:62025CO0336_INF: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 February 2026.#RY v European Commission.#Case C-336/25 P. CELEX:62025CO0849_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 May 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Second paragraph of Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Appeal brought by a party which was not unsuccessful in its submissions at first instance – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-849/25 P. CELEX:62025CJ0166_INF: Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 9 juillet 2026.#Commission européenne contre République portugaise.#Recours en manquement – Directive 2010/75/UE – Émissions industrielles (prévention et réduction intégrées de la pollution) – Transposition incorrecte ou incomplète.#Affaire C-166/25. CELEX:62024TO0587_INF: Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 February 2026.#GE v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation and European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Non-contractual liability – Cooperation of the police authorities and other law enforcement services of the Member States – Alleged unlawful processing of personal data – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Practice Rules for the Implementation of the Rules of Procedure – Clarification of references to the annexes – Action in part brought before a court manifestly lacking jurisdiction to hear and determine it, in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-587/24. CELEX:62024TJ0383_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 25 February 2026.#MNFPUGs Sustainable Cashmere Market Place Srl v European Commission.#Agriculture – Protected geographical indications – Application for a protected geographical indication ‘Монгол Тогтвортой ноолуур/Mongol Togtvortoi Nooluur’ – Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 – Scope – Application of the combined nomenclature – Error of law.#Case T-383/24. CELEX:62024TJ0671_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 December 2025.#GY v European Commission.#Case T-671/24. CELEX:62025TJ0480_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 May 2026.#Pharma Green Holding SpA SB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition Proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark alma FARMACIE – International registration of the earlier word mark ALMA HYBRID – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-480/25. CELEX:62026TO0272: Ordonnance du président du Tribunal du 22 juillet 2026.#Marek Lovás contre Parquet européen.#Référé – Rejet du recours principal – Non-lieu à statuer.#Affaire T-272/26 R. CELEX:62025TJ0307_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 June 2026.#Societatea Română de Endocrinologie v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Acta Endocrinologica (Buc) – Earlier EU word mark ACTA ENDOCRINOLOGICA (BUC), The International Journal of Romanian Society of Endocrinology / Registered in 1938 New series – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-307/25. CELEX:62025TJ0677_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Desimo, Lda. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark go VEGE – Earlier EU word mark végé’ – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-677/25. CELEX:62025TJ0291_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 6 May 2026.#Ecuphar v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark proGlan – International registration of the earlier word mark PRO PLAN – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-291/25. Comments are only visible to subscribers.