Admin MPS / sreda, 17. junij 2026 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62024CJ0550_INF: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Société générale v European Central Bank.#Case C-550/24 P. CELEX:62024CJ0550: Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 18 décembre 2025.#Société générale contre Banque centrale européenne.#Pourvoi – Politique économique et monétaire – Surveillance prudentielle des établissements de crédit – Mécanisme de surveillance unique – Règlement (UE) no 1024/2013 – Missions spécifiques de surveillance confiées à la Banque centrale européenne (BCE) – Article 4 – Fixation des exigences prudentielles – Article 16 – Risque lié aux engagements de paiement irrévocables (EPI) souscrits en faveur des systèmes de garantie des dépôts et des fonds de résolution – Déduction intégrale des sommes versées en tant que garantie des EPI des fonds propres de base de catégorie 1 – Pouvoir discrétionnaire de la BCE – Contrôle juridictionnel.#Affaire C-550/24 P. CELEX:62024CJ0551: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#Deutsche Lufthansa AG v AirHelp Germany GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Second indent of Article 7(1)(b) – Special jurisdiction in matters relating to a contract – Determination of the court with jurisdiction – Contract of carriage by air concluded between a consumer and a trader – Passenger’s claim for compensation arising from a delayed flight – Assignment of that claim to a collection agency – Claim for compensation brought by the assignee against the air carrier before the court for the place of the aircraft’s departure – Place of performance of the obligation in question – Place in a Member State where, under the contract of car Print 0 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62024CJ0188_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 16 juin 2026.#WebGroup Czech Republic, a.s. e.a. contre Ministre de la Culture e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Commerce électronique – Directive 2000/31/CE – Services de la société de l’information – Article 2, sous h) – Domaine coordonné – Article 3 – Restriction à la libre circulation des services de la société de l’information en provenance d’un autre État membre – Dérogation – Article 14 – Hébergement – Article 15 – Absence d’obligation générale de surveillance – Service électronique d’accès à du contenu pornographique – Réglementation nationale interdisant la fourniture de tels contenus à des mineurs et obligeant le prestataire à mettre en place un système de vérification d’âge – Articles 1 et 24 de la charte des droits CELEX:62025CO0851: Order of the Court of 9 June 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-851/25 P. CELEX:62024CJ0548_INF: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Crédit agricole SA and Others v European Central Bank.#Case C-548/24 P. CELEX:62025CO0850: Order of the Court of 9 June 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-850/25 P. CELEX:62025CO0620_INF: Order of the Court of 3 February 2026.#Guangzhou Wanglaoji Grand Health Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-620/25 P. CELEX:62025CO0450_INF: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 December 2025.#DR v European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority.#Appeal – Civil service – Temporary staff – Dismissal following a conflict of interest – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 11 – Principle of sound administration – Protection of personal data – Rejection of a complaint challenging the refusal to compensate the applicant – Action for annulment and for damages.#Case C-450/25 P. CELEX:62023CJ0729_INF: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 November 2025.#Kingdom of Spain v European Commission.#Case C-729/23 P. CELEX:62025CO0619_INF: Order of the Court of 3 February 2026.#Guangzhou Wanglaoji Grand Health Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-619/25 P. CELEX:62024CJ0188: Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 16 juin 2026.#WebGroup Czech Republic, a.s. e.a. contre Ministre de la Culture e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Commerce électronique – Directive 2000/31/CE – Services de la société de l’information – Article 2, sous h) – Domaine coordonné – Article 3 – Restriction à la libre circulation des services de la société de l’information en provenance d’un autre État membre – Dérogation – Article 14 – Hébergement – Article 15 – Absence d’obligation générale de surveillance – Service électronique d’accès à du contenu pornographique – Réglementation nationale interdisant la fourniture de tels contenus à des mineurs et obligeant le prestataire à mettre en place un système de vérification d’âge – Articles 1 et 24 de la charte des droits fond CELEX:62024CJ0146_INF: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#Fugro NV v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Taxation – Combating of tax avoidance – Directive (EU) 2022/2523 – Global minimum level of taxation for multinational enterprise groups and large-scale domestic groups in the Union – Article 17 – International shipping income exclusion – Challenge to the scope of that exclusion – Admissibility – Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU – Locus standi – Lack of individual concern.#Case C-146/24 P. CELEX:62025TJ0204_RES: Arrêt du Tribunal (troisième chambre) du 10 juin 2026 (Extraits).#IQ contre Agence européenne de défense.#Fonction publique – Agents temporaires – Personnel de l’AED – Rejet de la demande d’ouverture d’une procédure d’invalidité – Article 77 du statut des agents de l’AED – Abus de droit – Erreur d’appréciation.#Affaire T-204/25. CELEX:32022R0332R(02) CELEX:32026D1338: Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1338 of 15 June 2026 in support of a project on digital solutions for secure conventional ammunition stockpiles in the EU Neighbourhood (AIMS/SIMS) CELEX:32026D1345: Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1345 of 15 June 2026 amending Decision (CFSP) 2025/2379 on an assistance measure under the European Peace Facility to support the Armed Forces of Chad CELEX:32026R1175R(01) CELEX:32026D1360: Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1360 of 15 June 2026 amending Decision 2014/386/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in response to the illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol CELEX:32026D1346: Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1346 of 15 June 2026 amending Decision (CFSP) 2024/1980 on an assistance measure under the European Peace Facility to support the Beninese Armed Forces with military equipment designed to deliver lethal force CELEX:32022D0331R(03) CELEX:32026D1354: Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2026/1354 of 15 June 2026 authorising the provision of support from the EU Cybersecurity Reserve to Ukraine CELEX:62024TB0112: Case T-112/24: Order of the General Court of 21 April 2026 – Deutsche Bank and BHW Bausparkasse v ECB Comments are only visible to subscribers.