Related articles

• CELEX:62024TJ0460_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 September 2026.#Polina Sergeevna Gagarina v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘support of actions which undermine the territorial integrity of Ukraine’ – Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 269/201
• CELEX:62025TJ0205_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 October 2026.#Giulio Cesare Rizza v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Form annexed to a request for assistance sent by a national competition authority to the national competition authority of another Member State – Partial refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – Overriding public interest.#Case T-205/25.
• CELEX:62024TJ0203_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Zalando SE v European Commission.#Case T-203/24.
• CELEX:62025TJ0371_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Dentek Oral Care, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark dentix – Earlier EU word marks DENTEK and earlier EU figurative marks DenTek – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-371/25.
• CELEX:62025TJ0302_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 September 2026.#Van Eck Associates Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark MARKETVECTOR INDEXES – Earlier EU word mark VECTOR FUND – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character – Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-302/25.
• CELEX:62025CJ0133_INF:           Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#PV contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Pension d’ancienneté – Conditions d’octroi – Statut des fonctionnaires de l’Union européenne – Article 77 – Durée minimale de service – Absences injustifiées ou irrégulières – Article 59, paragraphe 3 – Article 60 – Imputation des absences irrégulières ou injustifiées sur la durée du congé annuel – Conséquences en cas d’épuisement dudit congé – Perte du bénéfice de la rémunération pour la période correspondant aux absences irrégulières ou injustifiées – Privation de plein droit du bénéfice de l’acquisition de droits à pension d’ancienneté pour la période concernée.#Affaire C-133/25 P.
• CELEX:62024CJ0309_INF: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Roberto Passalacqua v European Commission.#Case C-309/24 P.
• CELEX:62026CO0222:           Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 19 octobre 2026.#Prokuratura Regionalna w Lublinie contre HG e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Nécessité d’une interprétation du droit de l’Union pour que la juridiction de renvoi puisse rendre son jugement – Absence – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-222/26.
• CELEX:62025TJ0683_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 September 2026.#Freie Sachsen v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-683/25.
• CELEX:62024TJ0416_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2026.#ES v European Commission.#Civil service – Recruitment – Internal competition COM/AD/03/22 (AD 5) – Decision not to admit the applicant to the next stage of the competition – Principle of good administration – Duty of diligence and duty of care – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-416/24.
• CELEX:62026CO0111_INF: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 14 July 2026.#VOICE – Bundesverband der IT-Anwender eV v Cloud Infrastructure Services Providers in Europe (CISPE) and European Commission.#Appeal – Action for annulment – Application to intervene – Admissibility of the request – Time limit for lodging – Method for calculating the time limit – Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union – Extension of the time limit on account of distance – Out of time – Effective judicial protection – Principle of equal treatment.#Case C-111/26 P(I).
• CELEX:62025CO0617:           Ordonnance de la Cour (septième chambre) du 8 octobre 2026.#Mota Internacional – Comércio e Consultadoria Económica, Lda. contre Autoridade Tributária e Assuntos Fiscais da Região Autónoma da Madeira.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Irrecevabilité manifeste – Réponse pouvant être clairement déduite de la jurisprudence – Aides d’État – Article 108 TFUE – Décision de la Commission européenne ordonnant la récupération des aides illégales – Règlement (UE) 2015/1589 – Article 16, paragraphes 2 et 3 – Récupération des intérêts dus sur une aide d’État incompatible avec le marché intérieur – Exécution immédiate et effective – Procédure d’exécution fiscale portant sur la récupération des intérêts – Dél
• CELEX:32026D2448: Council Decision (EU) 2026/2448 of 26 October 2026 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the General Council of the World Trade Organization concerning the request for an extension of the WTO waiver permitting the European Union to grant autonomous trade preferences to the Western Balkans
• CELEX:32026D2402: Decision (EU) 2026/2402 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2026 amending Decision (EU) 2015/1814 as regards the market stability reserve for buildings, road transport and additional sectors (Text with EEA relevance)
• CELEX:32024R1351R(04)
• CELEX:32024R1358R(03)
• CELEX:32026R2446: Council Regulation (EU) 2026/2446 of 26 October 2026 amending Regulation (EU) 2023/2720 opening and providing for the management of autonomous Union tariff quotas for certain fishery products for the 2024-2026 period (Text with EEA relevance)
• CELEX:32025L2205R(03)
• CELEX:62024CO0667_INF: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 October 2026.#YP v AMCO - Asset Management Company SpA et pour son compte IFIS NPL Servicing SpA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Brindisi.#Case C-667/24.
• CELEX:62025CO0842:           Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 19 octobre 2026.#Investcapital Ltd contre PG.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Réponse pouvant être clairement déduite de la jurisprudence – Directive 93/13/CEE – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Article 6, paragraphe 1, et article 7, paragraphe 1 – Contrat de carte de crédit – Procédure d’injonction de payer – Contrôle d’office du caractère abusif des clauses contractuelles – Principe d’effectivité – Proposition du juge national de réduire la créance du montant lié à l’application d’une clause potentiellement abusive – Participation du consommateur au contrôle du caractère potentiellement abusif d’une clause.#Affaire C-842/25.