Admin MPS / četrtek, 24. oktober 2024 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62023TJ0373: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2024.#Galenica AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-373/23. CELEX:62023TJ0370_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 September 2024 (Extracts).#Samer Kamal Al-Assad v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted against Syria – Freezing of funds and economic resources – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Family membership criterion – Plea of illegality – Requirement that any limitation must be provided for by law – Error of assessment – Right to property.#Case T-370/23. CELEX:62023TJ0373_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2024.#Galenica AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-373/23. Print 19 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62025TJ0268: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 15 July 2026.#Sampension Livsforsikring A/S v Skatteministeriet.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Taxable persons – VAT group – Concept of ‘persons closely bound to one another by financial, economic and organisational links’ – Measures to prevent tax evasion or avoidance – Article 11 of Directive 2006/112/EC – Legislation of a Member State making it possible to include in a VAT group persons which are not taxable or are exempt from VAT – Condition of 100% ownership of the capital of the other members of the group in order for a VAT group to be formed.#Case T-268/25. CELEX:62024TJ0492: Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre élargie) du 15 juillet 2026.#Dimitry Aleksandrovich Beloglazov contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises eu égard aux actions compromettant ou menaçant l’intégrité territoriale, la souveraineté et l’indépendance de l’Ukraine – Gel des fonds – Restriction en matière d’admission sur le territoire des États membres – Liste des personnes, des entités et des organismes auxquels s’applique le gel des fonds et faisant l’objet de restrictions en matière d’admission sur le territoire des États membres – Inscription et maintien du nom du requérant sur la liste – Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous h), i), de la décision 2014/145/PESC – Notion de “personne qui facilite des CELEX:62025TJ0155: Arrêt du Tribunal (troisième chambre) du 15 juillet 2026.#IB contre Banque européenne d'investissement.#Fonction publique – Personnel de la BEI – Procédure disciplinaire – Sanction disciplinaire – Blâme – Délégation de pouvoirs – Absence de publication – Incompétence de l’auteur de l’acte.#Affaire T-155/25. CELEX:62024TJ0666: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Teva Pharma BV v European Medicines Agency.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Document from a scientific advice procedure for the medicinal product ferric carboxymaltose – Decision to grant a third party partial access to the document – Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests.#Case T-666/24. CELEX:62024TJ0661_RES: Arrêt du Tribunal (troisième chambre) du 15 juillet 2026.#République tchèque contre Commission européenne.#Responsabilité non contractuelle de l’Union – FEAGA et Feader – Arrêt annulant une décision de la Commission écartant du financement de l’Union certaines dépenses effectuées par les États membres au titre du FEAGA et du Feader – Remboursement par la Commission de la somme indûment perçue – Refus de la Commission de verser des intérêts sur le trop-perçu – Obligation de verser des intérêts – Indemnisation forfaitaire de la privation de la jouissance de la somme indûment payée à la Commission – Article 266 TFUE – Violation suffisamment caractérisée d’une règle de droit conférant des droits aux particuliers.#Affaire T-661/24. CELEX:62024TJ0529: Arrêt du Tribunal (troisième chambre) du 15 juillet 2026.#Kverulant.org o. p. s. contre Parlement européen.#Accès aux documents – Règlement (CE) no 1049/2001 – Documents relatifs aux rémunérations et aux indemnités des députés élus par la République tchèque – Refus partiel d’accès – Exception relative à la protection de la vie privée et de l’intégrité de l’individu – Article 4, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement no 1049/2001 – Protection des données à caractère personnel – Nécessité de la transmission de données à caractère personnel dans un but spécifique d’intérêt public – Article 9, paragraphe 1, du règlement (UE) 2018/1725.#Affaire T-529/24. CELEX:62026TO0236(01): Ordonnance du président du Tribunal du 13 juillet 2026.#RY contre Banque européenne d'investissement.#Référé – Fonction publique – Personnel de la BEI – Décision de la BEI refusant la demande de la requérante de télétravail à plein temps depuis Paris et lui proposant des aménagements raisonnables – Article 5 de la directive 2000/78/CE – Demande de sursis à exécution et de mesures provisoires – Fumus boni juris – Urgence – Mise en balance des intérêts.#Affaire T-236/26 R. CELEX:62024TJ0588: Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 15 juillet 2026.#OT contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises eu égard aux actions compromettant ou menaçant l’intégrité territoriale, la souveraineté et l’indépendance de l’Ukraine – Gel des fonds – Liste des personnes, des entités et des organismes auxquels s’applique le gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Maintien du nom du requérant sur la liste – Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous g), de la décision 2014/145/PESC – Erreur d’appréciation – Droits de la défense.#Affaire T-588/24. CELEX:62025TJ0677: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Desimo, Lda. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark go VEGE – Earlier EU word mark végé’ – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-677/25. CELEX:62024TJ0261: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Birių Krovinių Terminalas UAB v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Restrictive measures against Belarus – Prohibition on the purchase, import or transfer of potash products from Belarus – Prevention of the transit of potash from Belarus via the territory of Lithuania – Application seeking assessment of the legality of a provision that does not provide for restrictive measures against natural or legal persons within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 275 TFEU – Application for a direction to be issued – Partial lack of jurisdiction – Breach of procedural requirements – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Partial inadmissibility – Action for failure to act – No call to act – Ina CELEX:62024TJ0310: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Úsovsko Agro s. r. o. v European Commission.#State aid – Agricultural sector – Aid schemes for large enterprises in the primary agricultural sector in the Czech Republic – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Error of assessment – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – European Union Guidelines for State aid in the agricultural and forestry sectors and in rural areas 2014 to 2020 – Presence of an incentive effect – Proportionality – Ex post consideration of a counterfactual scenario.#Case T-310/24. CELEX:62025TJ0562: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 15 July 2026.#XXX v Hauptzollamt München.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Taxation of energy products and electricity – Concept of ‘energy products used for purposes other than as motor fuels or as heating fuels’ – First indent of Article 2(4)(b) of Directive 2003/96/EC – Propane used for the testing of burners.#Case T-562/25. CELEX:62024CO0350: Ordonnance de rectification du 8 juillet 2026.#HJ contre Crédit agricole Corporate & Investment Bank.#Rectification d’arrêt.#Affaire C-350/24. CELEX:62024TJ0661: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Czech Republic v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability of the European Union – EAGF and EAFRD – Judgment annulling a Commission decision excluding from EU financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the EAGF and EAFRD – Reimbursement by the Commission of the amount unduly received – Commission’s refusal to pay interest on the excess amount received – Obligation to pay interest – Compensation at a standard rate for the loss of enjoyment of the amount unduly paid to the Commission – Article 266 TFEU – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-661/24. CELEX:62024TJ0256: Arrêt du Tribunal (sixième chambre) du 15 juillet 2026.#RMC-Consulting Sàrl e.a. contre Parlement européen.#Clause compromissoire – Extension et remise à niveau du bâtiment Konrad Adenauer à Luxembourg – Contrat de services portant sur le suivi de travaux au titre du génie technique – Retard du chantier – Imputabilité – Refus du Parlement de régler certaines factures – Non-lieu à statuer partiel.#Affaire T-256/24. CELEX:62025TJ0555: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#OpenAI, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark OPENAI – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-555/25. CELEX:62024CJ0446_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#Freie Hansestadt Bremen v DT.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Freie Hansestadt Bremen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Directive 2008/115/EC – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Article 11(2) – Entry ban – Duration – National legislation which requires, in principle, an indefinite ban on entry and stay in certain cases – Terrorist threat.#Case C-446/24. CELEX:62024CJ0903_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 June 2026.#DJ et PJ v Santander Bank Polska S.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) – Loan agreement denominated in a foreign currency and containing unfair terms – Effects of the finding that a contractual term is unfair – Void agreement – Actions for restitution – Consumer’s right to default interest at the statutory rate on amounts to be repaid by the seller or supplier – National case-law requiring the payment of default interest at the statutory rate from the date on which the demand for payment was served indicating the specific amount of the claim – Dissuasive effect of the prohibition on unfair terms – Pr CELEX:62025CJ0132_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#M.M. Ristorazione Srl v Villa Ramazzini Srl.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Directive 2004/48/EC – Enforcement of intellectual property rights – Article 9(5) – Provisional measures – Failure to institute proceedings leading to a decision on the merits of the case – National legislation providing for the continuation of the effects of provisional measures intended to anticipate the effects of a decision on the merits of the case.#Case C-132/25. CELEX:62024CJ0889_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 May 2026.#SIA „DELVE 2” v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/191 – Imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People’s Republic of China – Article 1(3) – Customs declaration – Application for amendment – Presentation by the importer, after making the customs declaration, of a commercial invoice meeting the requirements of that provision.#Case C-889/24. Comments are only visible to subscribers.