Admin MPS / torek, 04. februar 2025 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62023CO0658_INF: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 September 2024.#Investcapital Ltd v TK.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Sectorului 3 Bucureşti.#Case C-658/23. CELEX:62023CO0658: Ordonnance de la Cour (septième chambre) du 3 septembre 2024.#Investcapital Ltd contre TK.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Réponse pouvant être clairement déduite de la jurisprudence de la Cour ou ne laissant place à aucun doute raisonnable – Directive 2008/52/CE – Médiation en matière civile et commerciale – Réglementation nationale prévoyant une séance d’information obligatoire sur la médiation – Jurisprudence constitutionnelle invalidant cette réglementation – Compatibilité de cette jurisprudence avec la directive – Principe de primauté du droit de l’Union – Directive 93/13/CEE – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Possibilité pour le juge de réviser une clause abusive.#Affaire C-658/23. CELEX:62023CO0659: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2024.#LD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 42c – Placement on leave in the interests of the service – Withdrawal of rights and privileges – Article 90 of the Statute – Concept of ‘decision’ and ‘complaint’ – Period for lodging an appeal – Inadmissibility.#Case C-659/23 P. Print 11 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62021TO0428: Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 March 2026.#Ivan Fursin and Others v European Central Bank.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Material damage – Causal link – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-428/21. CELEX:62025CO0647: Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 20 mars 2026.#OW.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Absence de litige pendant devant la juridiction de renvoi – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-647/25. CELEX:62023CJ0631_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#Servoprax GmbH v Hauptzollamt Duisburg.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 – Tariff classification – Common Customs Tariff – Combined Nomenclature – Classification under subheading 9018 90 84 – Tourniquets – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 – Second sentence of Article 252 – Validity.#Case C-631/23. CELEX:62024CJ0259_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#SAS Tenergie Development v Directeur Régional des Douanes de Marseille and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Import and export procedures – Repayment or remission of import or export duties – Transmission of the file requesting remission to the European Commission – Automatic remission of duties – Liability of the Member State – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-259/24. CELEX:62024CJ0402_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#BL v Dr. A, en qualité de mandataire liquidateur de Luftfahrtgesellschaft Walter mbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 98/59/EC – Collective redundancies – First subparagraph of Article 3(1) – Incorrect or incomplete notification of the projected collective redundancies to the competent public authority – First subparagraph of Article 4(1) – 30-day standstill period – Validity of the redundancies – Article 6 – Penalties.#Case C-402/24. CELEX:62024CJ0345_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni (AGCOM) v BRT SpA and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Postal parcel delivery services provided to the public – Directive 97/67/EC – Articles 22 and 22a – Regulation (EU) 2018/644 – Article 4 – Decision of the national regulatory authority imposing on parcel delivery service providers obligations to provide information – Legal basis for the competence of that authority to impose specific obligations to provide information on operators not carrying out cross-border parcel delivery – Proportionality.#Case C-345/24. CELEX:62021TO0427: Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 March 2026.#Trasta Komercbanka AS v European Central Bank.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Material damage – Causal link – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-427/21. CELEX:62024CJ0134_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#UR v DF.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 98/59/EC – Collective redundancies – First subparagraph of Article 3(1) – Requirement of prior notification of projected collective redundancies to the competent public authority – Whether notification meets the requirements of that directive – Not consistent – Validity of the dismissal – First subparagraph of Article 4(1) – 30-day standstill period.#Case C-134/24. CELEX:62023CJ0294_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#Republic of Bulgaria v European Commission.#Appeal – Common agricultural policy (CAP) – European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/261 – Expenditure excluded from EU financing – Expenditure incurred by the Republic of Bulgaria – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 52 – Conformity clearance procedure – Article 54 – Undue payments following the occurrence of irregularity or negligence – No recovery by the Member State concerned – European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) investigation report.#Case C-294/23 P. CELEX:32025D1904R(01) CELEX:32024R1689R(03) CELEX:32026D0728: Council Decision (EU) 2026/728 of 17 March 2026 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Committee of the Parties to the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence on the participation of non-governmental organisations as observers in meetings of that Committee, with regard to matters related to institutions and public administration of the Union CELEX:32025R2033R(06) CELEX:32025D1895R(02): Berichtigung des Beschlusses (GASP) 2025/1895 des Rates vom 12. September 2025 zur Änderung des Beschlusses 2014/145/GASP über restriktive Maßnahmen angesichts von Handlungen, die die territoriale Unversehrtheit, Souveränität und Unabhängigkeit der Ukraine untergraben oder bedrohen (ABl. L, 2025/1895, 15.9.2025) CELEX:62025TO0653(01): Ordonnance du président du Tribunal du 26 mars 2026.#MX e.a. contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Référé – Politique économique et monétaire – Adoption par la Bulgarie de l’euro au 1er janvier 2026 – Demande de sursis à exécution – Méconnaissance des exigences de forme – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-653/25 RII. CELEX:62025CJ0294: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#UD, VO, GT et KJ, en leur nom propre et en tant qu’associés de la Società Agricola UD e co. and Others v Agenzia Veneta per i pagamenti (AVEPA).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Milk and milk products – Regulation (EC) No 595/2004 – Deliveries made to non-approved purchasers – Article 24(1) – Concept of ‘penalty’ – Additional levy payable by the producer – Levy calculated on the basis of the total quantity of the product delivered – Proportionality – Rights of the defence and right to an effective remedy.#Case C-294/25. CELEX:62024CJ0338: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#LF v Sanofi Pasteur SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Liability for defective products – Directive 85/374/EEC – Article 13 – Relationship with the fault-based liability system – Fault by the producer linked to the defective nature of the product – Article 10 – Starting point of the three-year limitation period in the case of damage consisting in a progressive illness – Concept of ‘becoming aware of the damage’ – Article 11 – Extinguishment of the rights of the injured person – Validity – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right of access to a court.#Case C-338/24. CELEX:62024CC0505: Opinion of Advocate General Biondi delivered on 26 March 2026.### CELEX:62023CJ0696: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#Dmitry Alexandrovich Pumpyanskiy and Others v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 1(1)(e) and Article 2(1)(g) – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 3(1)(g) – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Concept of ‘leading businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Plea of illegality – Articles 7, 16, 17 and 47 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for private and family life, freedom to conduct a business, right to property and right to an effective judi CELEX:62024CJ0618_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 26 mars 2026.#XK e.a. contre SM.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Règlement (UE) no 650/2012 – Articles 1er, 3 et 4 – Champ d’application – Notion de “succession” – Legs légal conféré au titre du soutien apporté par l’aidant au défunt lors du vivant de ce dernier – Compétence générale d’une juridiction d’un État membre pour statuer sur l’ensemble d’une succession.#Affaire C-618/24. Comments are only visible to subscribers.