Admin MPS / četrtek, 24. oktober 2024 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62022TJ0798: Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#Ordre des avocats à la cour de Paris and Julie Couturier v Council of the European Union.#Case T-798/22. CELEX:62022TJ0797_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#Ordre néerlandais des avocats du barreau de Bruxelles and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on the provision of legal advisory services to the Russian Government and entities established in Russia – Fundamental role of lawyers in a democratic society – Right of lawyers to provide legal advisory services – Right to be advised by a lawyer – Articles 7 and 47 and Article 52(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Independence of lawyers – Rule of law – Proportionality – Legal certainty.#Case T-797/22. CELEX:62022TJ0798_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#Ordre des avocats à la cour de Paris and Julie Couturier v Council of the European Union.#Case T-798/22. Print 45 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62023CO0426: Ordonnance de la Cour (septième chambre) du 24 mars 2026.#D. D. et B. Zh. contre „Financial Bulgaria“ EOOD.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Article 267 TFUE – Activité d’assurance – Directive 2009/138/CE – Article 2, paragraphe 2 – Annexe – Partie A, point 14 – Article 14, paragraphe 1 – Agrément préalable – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire C-426/23. CELEX:62025TO0387: Ordonnance du Tribunal (neuvième chambre) du 26 mars 2026.#Molkerei Gropper GmbH & Co. KG contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne verbale FOOD IN A BOTTLE – Motif absolu de refus – Absence de caractère distinctif – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Recours manifestement dépourvu de tout fondement en droit.#Affaire T-387/25. CELEX:62025TO0784(02): Beschluss des Gerichts (Sechste Kammer) vom 25. März 2026.#Tiemo Wölken gegen Europäische Kommission.#Nichtigkeitsklage – Zugang zu Dokumenten – Verfrühter Zweitantrag – Fehlen einer anfechtbaren Handlung – Unzulässigkeit.#Rechtssache T-784/25. CELEX:62025TO0372: Beschluss des Gerichts (Neunte Kammer) vom 26. März 2026.#Molkerei Gropper GmbH & Co. KG gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Unionsmarke – Anmeldung der Unionswortmarke TASTY – Absolutes Eintragungshindernis – Fehlende Unterscheidungskraft – Art. 7 Abs. 1 Buchst. b der Verordnung (EU) 2017/1001 – Klage, der offensichtlich jede rechtliche Grundlage fehlt.#Rechtssache T-372/25. CELEX:62025TO0144: Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#WS v European Data Protection Supervisor.#Action for annulment and damages – Law governing the institutions – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Complaint to the EDPS concerning the processing of personal data by EUIPO – No need to adjudicate in part – Manifest inadmissibility in part.#Case T-144/25. CELEX:62025CO0593: Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 25 mars 2026.#T. sp. z o.o. contre Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Katowicach.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Réponse pouvant être clairement déduite de la jurisprudence – Directive 2003/96/CE – Taxation des produits énergétiques et de l’électricité – Article 21, paragraphe 5 – Droits d’accise perçus par un État membre en violation du droit de l’Union – Droit du producteur d’électricité au remboursement du trop-perçu – Pratique jurisprudentielle subordonnant le droit au remboursement à la démonstration d’un préjudice patrimonial – Enrichissement sans cause – Principe d’effectivité du droit de l’Union.#Affaire C-593/25. CELEX:32026D0733: Council Decision (EU) 2026/733 of 19 March 2026 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union at the fifteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals as regards proposals from various parties to amend the Appendices to that Convention CELEX:32026L0799: Directive (EU) 2026/799 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 March 2026 harmonising certain aspects of insolvency law (Text with EEA relevance) CELEX:32026D0800: Decision (EU) 2026/800 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 March 2026 appointing the European Chief Prosecutor of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office CELEX:32024D1248R(01) CELEX:62025CO0642: Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 16 mars 2026.#Dragoș Ionuț Onescu contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Article 181 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Défaut de clarté et de précision des moyens – Pourvoi en partie manifestement non fondé et en partie manifestement irrecevable.#Affaire C-642/25 P. CELEX:62023TJ1083_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#XH v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Investigation conducted by OLAF – Transfer for the duration of the investigation – Article 7(1) of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Request for the use of documents under Article 19 of the Staff Regulations – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Preparatory measure – Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure – Partial inadmissibility – Interests of the service – Equivalence of posts – Liability.#Case T-1083/23. CELEX:62025CO0589: Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 23 mars 2026.#Ministero dell'Interno et Questura Ragusa contre TV, agissant en tant que représentant légal de 23 PLAY srls.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Réponse pouvant être clairement déduite de la jurisprudence – Article 49 TFUE – Liberté d’établissement – Article 56 TFUE – Libre prestation des services – Restrictions – Jeux de hasard – Collecte et gestion de paris – Conditions d’autorisation – Législation nationale subordonnant l’exercice de l’activité de collecte de paris à l’obtention d’une autorisation de police et d’une concession – Raisons impérieuses d’intérêt général – Lutte contre la criminalité organisée dans le secteur des jeux de hasard.#Affaire C-589/25. CELEX:62025CO0719: Order of the Court of 4 March 2026.#La Superquímica, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency of development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-719/25 P. CELEX:62025CO0766: Order of the Court of 24 March 2026.#Capella EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-766/25 P. CELEX:62024TO0558(01) CELEX:32023R2842R(03) CELEX:32026D0778: Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/778 of 30 March 2026 amending Decision (CFSP) 2024/583 on a European Union maritime security operation to safeguard freedom of navigation in relation to the Red Sea crisis (EUNAVFOR ASPIDES) CELEX:32026R0786: Council Regulation (EU) 2026/786 of 30 March 2026 amending Regulation (EU) 2026/249 fixing for 2026, 2027 and 2028 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, for Union fishing vessels, in certain non-Union waters CELEX:32026D0777: Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/777 of 30 March 2026 amending Joint Action 2008/851/CFSP on a European Union military operation to contribute to maritime security in the West Indian Ocean and in the Red Sea (EUNAVFOR ATALANTA) Comments are only visible to subscribers.