Admin MPS / petek, 29. november 2024 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62022TJ0465_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 December 2023.#European Investment Bank v Syrian Arab Republic.#Case T-465/22. CELEX:62022TJ0462_RES: Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 6 novembre 2024.#Millennium BCP Participações, SGPS, Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda et BCP África, SGPS, Lda contre Commission européenne.#Aides d’État – Zone franche de Madère – Régime d’aides mis à exécution par le Portugal – Décision constatant la non-conformité du régime aux décisions C(2007) 3037 final et C(2013) 4043 final, déclarant ce régime incompatible avec le marché intérieur et ordonnant la récupération des aides versées en application de celui-ci – Obligation de motivation – Notion d’“aide existante” au sens de l’article 1er, sous b), ii), du règlement (UE) 2015/1589 – Absence de dérogation à la condition relative à la création ou au maintien de postes de travail dans la région autonome de Madère – Principe CELEX:62022TJ0466_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#European Investment Bank v République arabe syrienne.#Case T-466/22. Print 18 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62024CJ0242_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany.#Appeal – State aid – Combined heat and power generation sector – Reform of the arrangements for support for cogeneration – Decision of the European Commission declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Concept of ‘State aid’ – Measures granted through State resources – Condition relating to the existence of a compulsory surcharge.#Case C-242/24 P. CELEX:62025CC0279: Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 9 July 2026.### CELEX:62024CJ0771: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Fédération belge du stationnement ASBL and Interparking SA v Région de Bruxelles-Capitale, représentée par son Gouvernement.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2001/42/EC – Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment – Article 2(a) – Concept of ‘plans and programmes’ – Article 3(2)(a) – Measures prepared for certain sectors and setting a framework for future development consent of projects listed in Annexes I and II to Directive 2011/92/EU – Plan or programme in the transport, town and country planning or land use sector – Order laying down the conditions for operating car parks – Maintenance of the effects of a national act where there is no environmental im CELEX:62025CJ0307: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#KFZ Kolak e.U. v GF.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive (EU) 2019/771 – Contracts for the sale of goods – Article 13(4)(c) – Remedies for lack of conformity of the goods – Concept of a ‘lack of conformity which is of such a serious nature as to justify an immediate price reduction or termination of the sales contract’ – Lack of conformity relating to the safety of the goods – Bringing the goods into conformity inexpensively.#Case C-307/25. CELEX:62025CC0170: Opinion of Advocate General Spielmann delivered on 9 July 2026.### CELEX:62025CC0535: Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 9 July 2026.### CELEX:62024CJ0242: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany.#Appeal – State aid – Combined heat and power generation sector – Reform of the arrangements for support for cogeneration – Decision of the European Commission declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Concept of ‘State aid’ – Measures granted through State resources – Condition relating to the existence of a compulsory surcharge.#Case C-242/24 P. CELEX:62025CJ0234: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Sky Österreich Fernsehen GmbH v Verein für Konsumenteninformation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Consumer rights – Directive 2011/83/EC – Exceptions from the right of withdrawal – Contracts for the supply of digital content which is not supplied on a tangible medium – Article 16(m) – Subscription to a streaming service – Supply of digital services – Offer of a dynamic nature going beyond the mere stable and, as the case may be, continuous provision of specific content.#Case C-234/25. CELEX:62024CJ0888: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Adão da Fonseca-Engenheiros Consultores, Lda v Metro do Porto, S.A. and Betar Consultores, Lda.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 82 – Procedure relating to a design contest – No prior hearing of candidates – Protection of anonymity – Right to be heard.#Case C-888/24. CELEX:62024CJ0856: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Sad Trasporto Locale SpA v Provincia autonoma di Bolzano.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award of a public passenger transport services contract to an internal operator – Conditions – Applicable rules – Directive 2014/23/EU – Award of concession contracts – Point 1 of Article 5 – Concept of ‘services concession’ – Transfer of an operating risk – Directive 2014/24/EU – Public procurement – Article 12 – Concept of ‘control similar to that which a contracting authority exercises over its own departments’ – National legislation limiting the direct award of public service contracts to an CELEX:62024CJ0788: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Anne Frank Fonds v Anne Frank Stichting and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 3(1) – Concept of ‘communication to the public’ – Article 6(3) – Effective technological measures – Work that is in the public domain in certain Member States and still protected by copyright in another Member State – Publication of that work on a website – Geo-blocking measure designed to prevent access to that website from the Member State in which the work is still protected – Possibility of circumventing that measure by means of a virtual private network (VPN) or similar service.#Case C-788/24. CELEX:62025CJ0186: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Institut po ribni resursi Varna v Rakovoditel na Natsionalnia organ po Savmestna operativna programa za transgranichno satrudnichestvo „Chernomorski baseyn 2014-2020“ i direktor na direktsia „Upravlenie na teritorialnoto satrudnichestvo“.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Own resources of the European Union – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 – European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) – Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 – European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI) – Regulation (EU) No 232/2014 – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 897/2014 – Cross-border Cooperation Programme for the Black Sea Region – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Direct award – Conce CELEX:62024CJ0768: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Hortis GRC SA v JA and France Travail Île-de-France, anciennement Pôle emploi Île-de-France.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations – Article 3 – Choice made by the parties – Article 6 – Contract of employment – Mandatory rules of the law which would be applicable in the absence of choice – Determination of the applicable law – Contract of employment more closely connected with another country – Criteria for assessment – Closer connections resulting, in the performance of a contract of employment, from the parties’ choice of the law applicable to that contract.#Case C-768/24. CELEX:62025CJ0188: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Štátny fond rozvoja bývania v GL and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 2(c) – Concept of ‘seller or supplier’ – Loan and guarantee agreements – State Housing Development Fund – Task carried out in the public interest – Loans granted on preferential terms – Referral back for reconsideration following an appeal – Obligation to comply with the legal rulings of a higher court – Principle of the primacy of EU law – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment.#Case C-188/25. CELEX:62023CJ0428_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#ROGON GmbH & Co. KG and Others v Deutscher Fußballbund eV (DFB).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market – Competition – Professional football – Article 101(1) TFEU – Prohibition of agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Regulations of a national football federation – Purchase of services from third parties outside that federation – Activity of the players’ agents – Restriction of competition by object or by effect – Exception to the prohibition in Article 101(1) TFEU – Scope – Objectives pursued by those regulations – Whether justified – Conditions – Pursuit of legitimate objectives in the public interest – Necessity – Proportionality.#Case C-428/23. CELEX:62024CJ0199: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#ND v Legal Newsdesk Sweden AB, anciennement Garrapatica AB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Scope – Making information relating to criminal convictions available to the public online in return for remuneration – Reconciling the right to protection of personal data with the right to freedom of expression and information – Article 79 – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Scope – Article 85 – Concept of processing of personal data carried out for ‘journalistic purposes’.#Case C-199/24. CELEX:62025CJ0166: Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 9 juillet 2026.#Commission européenne contre République portugaise.#Recours en manquement – Directive 2010/75/UE – Émissions industrielles (prévention et réduction intégrées de la pollution) – Transposition incorrecte ou incomplète.#Affaire C-166/25. CELEX:62026CO0037: Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 26 juin 2026.#Procédure pénale contre XD.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Exigence de présentation du contexte factuel et réglementaire du litige au principal ainsi que des raisons justifiant la nécessité d’une réponse par la Cour – Absence de précisions suffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-37/26. CELEX:62025CC0323: Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 9 July 2026.### CELEX:62025CC0435: Opinion of Advocate General Norkus delivered on 9 July 2026.### Comments are only visible to subscribers.