Admin MPS / petek, 23. junij 2023 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62022TJ0419: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Medex, živilska industrija, d.o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-419/22. CELEX:62022TJ0416_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 15 May 2024.#Fresenius Kabi Austria GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Medicinal products for human use – Suspension of national marketing authorisations for medicinal products for human use containing the active substance hydroxyethyl starch (HES), solutions for infusion – Action for annulment – Direct concern – Partial inadmissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Precautionary principle – Proportionality – Article 116 of Directive 2001/83/EC.#Case T-416/22. CELEX:62022TJ0419_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 June 2023.#Medex, živilska industrija, d.o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-419/22. Print 67 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62025CA0602: Case C-602/25, Ithaque Sécurité: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 September 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles – Belgium) – Ithaque Sécurité SAS v État belge (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom to provide services – Article 56 TFEU – Restrictions – Private security activities – National legislation requiring prior authorisation to carry out such an activity – Taking into account guarantees provided in the Member State of origin of the service provider) CELEX:62026CB0106: Case C-106/26 P: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 July 2026 Appeal brought on 17 February 2026 by Harouna Douamba against the Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) made on 15 December 2025 – T-143/25, Douamba v Council (Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 168(2) and Article 119(2) and (4) of the Rules of Procedure – Appeal manifestly inadmissible – Failure to produce an official document or a warrant within the prescribed time limit) CELEX:62026TB0330: Case T-330/26 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 14 September 2026 – TH v Commission (Application for interim measures – Public procurement – Exclusion from public procurement procedures governed by Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 or from being selected to implement EU funds – Publication of information – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Prima facie case – Urgency – Balancing of interests) CELEX:62026CN0713: Case C-713/26 P: Appeal brought on 30 June 2026 by UU against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 22 April 2026 in Case T-84/24, UU v Court of Justice of the European Union CELEX:62026CN0844: Case C-844/26 P: Appeal brought on 30 July 2026 by GW against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 03 June 2026 in Case T-662/24, GW v Commission CELEX:62025CA0330: Case C-330/25, RTÉ: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 September 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court – Ireland) – Raidió Teilifís Éireann (RTÉ) v Commissioner for Environmental Information (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Aarhus Convention – Directive 2003/4/EC – Right of access to environmental information held by or for public authorities – Article 2(2)(a) – Concept of public authority – Legal person responsible for the public broadcasting service) CELEX:62026TB0305: Case T-305/26 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 14 September 2026 – SNF Group v ECHA (Interim measures – Biocidal products – List of active substances and their suppliers provided for in Article 95 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Inclusion of a company in the list as an authorised supplier of the active substance tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium sulphate (2:1) in product-types 6, 11 and 12 – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency) CELEX:62026TB0244: Case T-244/26 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 14 September 2026 – SNF Group v ECHA (Interim measures – Biocidal products – List of active substances and their suppliers provided for in Article 95 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Inclusion of a company in the list as an authorised supplier of the active substance tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium sulphate (2:1) in product-type 12 – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency) CELEX:62026TN0588: Case T-588/26: Action brought on 6 September 2026 – Baltic gastronomy leaders v REA CELEX:62026TN0410: Case T-410/26: Action brought on 1 July 2026 – Yelo Bank v Council CELEX:62026TN0564: Case T-564/26: Action brought on 24 August 2026 – Xinxiang Richful Lube Additive v Council CELEX:62026CN0825: Case C-825/26: Action brought on 27 July 2026 – European Commission v Hungary CELEX:62026CN0891: Case C-891/26, Société Dean & Simmons France and Others: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 5 August 2026 – Société Dean & Simmons France, Société Manufacture de Tabacs Heintz Van Landewyck, Société EVLB, Société JT International France, Société Philip Morris France, Confédération des buralistes, British American Tobacco France v Ministre de la Santé, des Familles, de l’Autonomie et des Personnes handicapées, Premier ministre CELEX:62023CA0773: Case C-773/23 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 September 2026 – European Crop Care Association (ECCA) v European Commission (Appeal – Plant protection products – Active substances – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Article 4 – Approval criteria for active substances – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/17 – Non-renewal of approval of the active substance chlorpyrifos-methyl – Admissibility – Second paragraph of Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Standing to bring proceedings – Condition that the applicant must be directly affected by the judgment against which it is appealing – Appeal brought by an intervener at first instance) CELEX:62026TN0536: Case T-536/26: Action brought on 12 August 2026 – Whaleco Technology v Commission CELEX:62024TA0459: Case T-459/24: Judgment of the General Court of 16 September 2026 – Trotsenko v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Duty to state reasons – CELEX:62024CA0565: Case C-565/24, P-GmbH & Co. KG (Coffee trips): Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof – Germany) – P-GmbH & Co. KG v Finanzamt Q (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC – Special schemes – Article 26 – Travel agents – Excursion organised by a trader away from his or her business premises – Taxation under the margin scheme without deduction of the input VAT paid – Negative margin potentially leading to a VAT refund – Coffee trips) CELEX:62026TN0587: Case T-587/26: Action brought on 2 September 2026 – NK v EIGE CELEX:62026CB0034: Case C-34/26 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 23 September 2026 Appeal brought on 28 January 2026 by Nouryon Functional Chemicals BV and Others against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 19 November 2025 – T-1122/23, Nouryon Functional Chemicals and Others v ECHA (Appeal – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) – European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed) CELEX:62025CA0011: Case C-11/25, Jelgavas valstspilsētas pašvaldība: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 September 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) – Latvia) – Jelgavas valstspilsētas pašvaldība v Konkurences padome (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of a dominant position – Concept of economic activity – Decision relating to the exercise of public powers – Award by a municipality of the right to provide municipal waste management services – Service provider partially owned by the municipality) Comments are only visible to subscribers.