Related articles

• CELEX:62024TJ0540: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 July 2026.#RH v European Commission.#Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance – OLAF investigation – Commission decision imposing an administrative penalty – Exclusion from procurement and grant award procedures under the Financial Regulation and the financial regulation applicable to the 11th EDF or from being selected for the implementation of funds governed by those regulations – Registration in the early detection and exclusion system database – Grave professional misconduct – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-540/24.
• CELEX:62025TJ0187:           Arrêt du Tribunal (troisième chambre) du 8 juillet 2026.#IF contre Centre européen de prévention et de contrôle des maladies.#Fonction publique – Agents contractuels – Contrat à durée déterminée – Non-renouvellement – Exception d’illégalité – Droit d’être entendu – Droit au respect de la vie privée – Droit à la protection des données personnelles – Présomption d’innocence – Principe d’impartialité – Confiance légitime – Délai raisonnable – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation.#Affaire T-187/25.
• CELEX:62025TJ0762:           Urteil des Gerichts (Fünfte Kammer) vom 8. Juli 2026.#Phoenix Pharma SE gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Unionsmarke – Anmeldung der Unionswortmarke Be the Heartbeat of Healthcare – Absolutes Eintragungshindernis – Unterscheidungskraft – Art. 7 Abs. 1 Buchst. b der Verordnung (EU) 2017/1001 – Art. 94 Abs. 1 der Verordnung 2017/1001.#Rechtssache T-762/25.
• CELEX:62025TJ0356: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 July 2026.#AY v Anexartiti Archi Dimosion Esodon.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of VAT – Tax representative appointed as the person liable for payment of VAT – Article 204 of Directive 2006/112/EC – Joint and several liability – Article 205 of Directive 2006/112 – National legislation appointing the tax representative as liable for payment of VAT and providing for his or her joint and several liability – Proportionality.#Case T-356/25.
• CELEX:62024TJ0538: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 8 July 2026.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Italian air transport market – Extension and amendment of a compensation scheme for airlines with an Italian operating licence – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Eligibility condition relating to a minimum remuneration requirement for employees whose home base is located in Italy – Principle of non-discrimination – Free provision of services – Freedom of establishment – Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 – Assessment of damage – Causal link – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-538/24.
• CELEX:62025CO0872: Order of the Court of 30 June 2026.#European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators v Swissgrid AG.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal allowed to proceed.#Case C-872/25 P.
• CELEX:62026CO0278: Order of the Court of 30 June 2026.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-278/26 P.
• CELEX:62025CO0255: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 June 2026.#Technikes Anaktisis kai Diachorismou AE (ECORESET AE) v Perifereia Attikis.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Reply which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law – Private investment aid scheme – Aid scheme compatible with the internal market – Refusal by the competent authority to grant aid under that scheme – Legal action seeking annulment of that refusal decision – Retroactive effect of a possible judicial annulment of that refusal decision – Expiry, during the legal proceedings, of the period laid down for granting the aid under that aid scheme – Date on which the aid concerned is deemed to have been granted – Article 47 of the Charter of Fund
• CELEX:62023TJ1079_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 July 2026.#Apple Inc. v European Commission.#Actions for annulment – Digital services – Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 – Designation of a gatekeeper – Opening of a market investigation – Closure of a market investigation – Interoperability – Core platform services – Online intermediation service – Software application store – Number-independent interpersonal communications service – Plea of illegality – Act not open to challenge.#Cases T-1079/23 and T-1080/23.
• CELEX:62026TO0148(01): Order of the President of the General Court of 8 July 2026.#Rombat SA and Others v European Commission.#Application for interim measures – Competition – Decision of the Commission imposing a fine – Bank guarantee – Application for suspension of operation and interim measures – Lack of urgency.#Case T-148/26 R.
• CELEX:62025TJ0309: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 July 2026.#SCM Biogroup v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark BIO-GROUP MEDICAL SYSTEM – Earlier EU figurative mark BIOGROUP – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-309/25.
• CELEX:62024TJ0606:           Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 8 juillet 2026.#Oleg Vladimirovich Deripaska contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises eu égard aux actions compromettant ou menaçant l’intégrité territoriale, la souveraineté et l’indépendance de l’Ukraine – Gel des fonds – Listes des personnes, des entités et des organismes auxquels s’applique le gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Maintien du nom du requérant sur la liste – Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous g), de la décision 2014/145/PESC – Notion de “femme ou homme d’affaires ayant une activité dans des secteurs économiques qui fournissent une source substantielle de revenus au gouvernement de la Fédération de Russie” – Violation des formes s
• CELEX:62025CO0555:           Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 30 juin 2026.#RL contre AL.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Exigence d’indication du lien entre les dispositions du droit de l’Union dont l’interprétation est demandée et la législation nationale applicable – Absence de précisions suffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-555/25.
• CELEX:62025TJ0381: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 July 2026.#P. sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Łodzi.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Harmonisation of the structures of excise duties on alcohol and alcoholic beverages – Ethyl alcohol – Exemptions – Article 27(1)(b) of Directive 92/83/EEC – Definition of ‘products not for human consumption’ – Criteria for assessment.#Case T-381/25.
• CELEX:62023TJ1079: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 July 2026.#Apple Inc. v European Commission.#Actions for annulment – Digital services – Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 – Designation of a gatekeeper – Opening of a market investigation – Closure of a market investigation – Interoperability – Core platform services – Online intermediation service – Software application store – Number-independent interpersonal communications service – Plea of illegality – Act not open to challenge.#Cases T-1079/23 and T-1080/23.
• CELEX:62021TJ0268(01): Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 8 July 2026.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Italian air transport market – Compensation scheme for airlines with an Italian operating licence – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Eligibility condition relating to a minimum remuneration requirement for employees whose home base is located in Italy – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of non-discrimination – Free provision of services – Freedom of establishment – Assessment of damage – Causal link – Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008.#Case T-268/21 RENV.
• CELEX:62025TJ0350: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 July 2026.#Aguirre y Compañía, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark BLUE PADEL – Earlier EU figurative marks BULLPADEL – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Interdependence between factors – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-350/25.
• CELEX:62025TJ0450:           Arrêt du Tribunal (sixième chambre) du 8 juillet 2026.#Elena Nayra Peña de Paz contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Marque de l’Union européenne verbale MICUIR HANDMADE IN SPAIN – Causes de nullité absolue – Absence de caractère distinctif – Caractère descriptif – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous b) et c), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Décision de la chambre de recours renvoyant l’affaire devant la division d’annulation – Recevabilité du recours devant le Tribunal – Éléments de preuve présentés pour la première fois devant le Tribunal.#Affaire T-450/25.
• OJ:C_202603721: Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Borgarting Court of Appeal dated 23 March 2026 in the case of The Tinius Trust Foundation and Tom Erik Thorsen v The Norwegian Government, represented by the Ministry of Defence (Staten v/ Forsvarsdepartementet) (Case E-5/26)
• CELEX:62025CO0609:           Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 29 juin 2026.#„Е.М.“ ** contre A.М.А.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 100, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Litige au principal devenu sans objet – Non-lieu à statuer.#Affaire C-609/25.