Related articles

• CELEX:62026TO0179:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (neuvième chambre) du 26 octobre 2026.#Andrii Falaleiev contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Recours en carence – Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises eu égard aux actions compromettant ou menaçant l’intégrité territoriale, la souveraineté et l’indépendance de l’Ukraine – Prise de position du Conseil mettant fin à la carence – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-179/26.
• CELEX:62025CO0266:           Ordonnance de rectification du 21 octobre 2026.#I-Sete - Inovação, Soluções Económicas e Tecnologias Ecológicas, Lda. contre EDIA- Empresa de Desenvolvimento e Infra-estruturas do Alqueva, S.A.#Rectification d’arrêt.#Affaires jointes C-266/25 et C-267/25.
• CELEX:62026CO0446_SUM: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 July 2026.#RI v Openbaar Ministerie.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of conducting a criminal prosecution or executing custodial sentences – Article 6(1) – Issuing judicial authority – Article 8(1)(c) – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office on the basis of a national arrest warrant issued by a court – No judicial review concerning the issue of the European arrest warrant –
• CELEX:62024CJ0857_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#daa plc, anciennement Dublin Airport Authority plc and Others v Irish Aviation Authority and Airport Coordination Limited.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Irlande).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 – Allocation of slots at European Union airports – Article 6 – Coordination parameters – Determination taking account of relevant technical, operational and environmental constraints – Urban planning rules – Limit on the annual number of air passengers – Article 8 – Process of slot allocation – Historic slots – Grandfather rights – Articles 16 and 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-857/24.
• CELEX:32026D2472: Council Decision (EU) 2026/2472 of 21 October 2026 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the written procedure by the Participants to the Arrangement on Officially Supported Export Credits concerning a Common Line derogating from the rules on minimum premium rates in relation to an energy project in Egypt
• CELEX:32026D2449: Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/2449 of 29 October 2026 on an assistance measure under the European Peace Facility to support the Armed Forces of Mauritania
• CELEX:32023R2854R(07)
• CELEX:32026L2450: Directive (EU) 2026/2450 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2026 amending Directive 2004/37/EC on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens, mutagens or reprotoxic substances at work (Text with EEA relevance)
• CELEX:32026D2458: Council Decision (EU) 2026/2458 of 29 October 2026 on the financial contributions to be paid by the parties to the European Development Fund to finance that fund, setting out the ceiling for 2028, the annual amount for 2027, the amount of the first instalment for 2027 and an indicative, non-binding forecast for the expected annual amounts of contributions for the years 2029 and 2030
• CELEX:32026D2471: Council Decision (EU) 2026/2471 of 12 October 2026 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Joint Committee established by the Agreement between the European Community, of the one part, and the Government of Denmark and the Home Government of the Faroe Islands, of the other part, concerning the amendment of the provisions to implement the Protocol on veterinary matters supplementing that Agreement
• CELEX:62024TJ0460_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 September 2026.#Polina Sergeevna Gagarina v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘support of actions which undermine the territorial integrity of Ukraine’ – Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 269/201
• CELEX:62025TJ0205_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 October 2026.#Giulio Cesare Rizza v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Form annexed to a request for assistance sent by a national competition authority to the national competition authority of another Member State – Partial refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – Overriding public interest.#Case T-205/25.
• CELEX:62024TJ0203_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Zalando SE v European Commission.#Case T-203/24.
• CELEX:62025TJ0371_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Dentek Oral Care, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark dentix – Earlier EU word marks DENTEK and earlier EU figurative marks DenTek – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-371/25.
• CELEX:62025TJ0302_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 September 2026.#Van Eck Associates Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark MARKETVECTOR INDEXES – Earlier EU word mark VECTOR FUND – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character – Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-302/25.
• CELEX:62025CJ0133_INF:           Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#PV contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Pension d’ancienneté – Conditions d’octroi – Statut des fonctionnaires de l’Union européenne – Article 77 – Durée minimale de service – Absences injustifiées ou irrégulières – Article 59, paragraphe 3 – Article 60 – Imputation des absences irrégulières ou injustifiées sur la durée du congé annuel – Conséquences en cas d’épuisement dudit congé – Perte du bénéfice de la rémunération pour la période correspondant aux absences irrégulières ou injustifiées – Privation de plein droit du bénéfice de l’acquisition de droits à pension d’ancienneté pour la période concernée.#Affaire C-133/25 P.
• CELEX:62024CJ0309_INF: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Roberto Passalacqua v European Commission.#Case C-309/24 P.
• CELEX:62026CO0222:           Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 19 octobre 2026.#Prokuratura Regionalna w Lublinie contre HG e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Nécessité d’une interprétation du droit de l’Union pour que la juridiction de renvoi puisse rendre son jugement – Absence – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-222/26.
• CELEX:62025TJ0683_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 September 2026.#Freie Sachsen v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-683/25.
• CELEX:62024TJ0416_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2026.#ES v European Commission.#Civil service – Recruitment – Internal competition COM/AD/03/22 (AD 5) – Decision not to admit the applicant to the next stage of the competition – Principle of good administration – Duty of diligence and duty of care – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-416/24.