Admin MPS / ponedeljek, 22. april 2024 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62022CA0584: Case C-584/22, Kiwi Tours: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof – Germany) – QM v Kiwi Tours GmbH CELEX:62022CA0583: Case C-583/22 PPU: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — criminal proceedings against MV (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA — Article 3(1) — Principle of assimilation of earlier convictions handed down in another Member State — Obligation to ensure that the effects attached to those convictions are equivalent to those attached to previous national convictions — National rules concerning subsequent formation of a cumulative sentence — Multiple offences — Determination of an aggregate sentence — Maximum of 15 years for non-life custodial sentences — Arti CELEX:62022CA0585: Case C-585/22, Staatssecretaris van Financiën (Interest in respect of an intra-group loan): Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 October 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden – Netherlands) – X BV v Staatssecretaris van Finaciën (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of establishment – Article 49 TFEU – Corporation tax – Intra-group cross-border loan for the purposes of financing the acquisition or the extension of an interest in a company not related to the group concerned that becomes, as a result of that transaction, related to that group – Deduction of interest paid on that loan – Loan contracted on an arm’s length basis – Concept of wholly artificial arrangement – Principle of proportionality) Print 46 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles OJ:C_202604511: Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by the the District Court of Reykjavik dated 30 March 2026 in the case of Íslenska gámafélagið ehf. v Sorpa bs. (Case E-6/26) OJ:C_202604512: Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by the Supreme Court of Norway dated 24 April 2026 in the case of Hemla Africa Holding AS & Others v Philia E&P Holding (Ireland) Limited (Case E-8/26) CELEX:62025CO0851_INF: Order of the Court of 9 June 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-851/25 P. CELEX:62025CO0883_INF: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 May 2026.#María del Pilar Galindo Giralt v Kingdom of Spain.#Case C-883/25. CELEX:62025CO0502_INF: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#„YETTEL BULGARIA“ EAD v FB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Case C-502/25. CELEX:62024CJ0518_INF: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#European Commission v Hellenic Republic.#Case C-518/24. CELEX:62025CO0850_INF: Order of the Court of 9 June 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-850/25 P. CELEX:32026D1947: Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1947 of 21 April 2026 on the signing and conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Djibouti on the status of the European Union-led forces in the Republic of Djibouti in the framework of the European Union maritime security operation to safeguard freedom of navigation in relation to the Red Sea crisis (EUNAVFOR ASPIDES) CELEX:32009L0069R(01) CELEX:62025CO0582(01)_INF: Order of the General Court (Single Judge), M. Biltgen François of 4 May 2026.#Alireza Malekzadeh Arasteh v European Commission.#Interim relief – Appeal – Application for interim measures – Dismissal of the main action – No need to adjudicate.#Case C-582/25 P-R. CELEX:32026R0382R(04) CELEX:62026CN0323: Case C-323/26, Protectra: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Leipzig (Germany) lodged on 14 April 2026 – Protectra GmbH v sprd.net AG CELEX:62026CN0496: Case C-496/26, Civinity Mājas: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 18 May 2026 – Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs v AS Civinity Mājas CELEX:62026TN0374: Case T-374/26: Action brought on 8 June 2026 – Kesaev v Council CELEX:62025TA0415: Case T-415/25: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – KH v Commission (Civil service – Temporary staff – Recruitment – Internal competition COM/AST4/2023 – Decision to exclude the applicant from the competition – Failure to attend the oral test on health grounds – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Principle of sound administration – Liability – Non-material damage) CELEX:62025TA0356: Case T-356/25, Rapera: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 8 July 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Dioikitiko Protodikeio Thessalonikis – Greece) – AY v Anexartiti Archi Dimosion Esodon (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of VAT – Tax representative appointed as the person liable for payment of VAT – Article 204 of Directive 2006/112/EC – Joint and several liability – Article 205 of Directive 2006/112 – National legislation appointing the tax representative as liable for payment of VAT and providing for his or her joint and several liability – Proportionality) CELEX:62026CN0517: Case C-517/26, Aranzadi La Ley: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 21 May 2026 – Aranzadi La Ley S.A.U. v VLex Networks, S.L. CELEX:62026CA0182: Case C-182/26 PPU, Hardeker: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Haarlem – Netherlands) – DL v Minister van Asiel en Migratie (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Immigration policy – Return of third-country nationals staying illegally in a Member State – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 3(3) – Country of destination – Article 5 – Principle of non-refoulement – Article 15 – Detention for the purpose of removal – Review of compliance with the conditions governing lawfulness – Time at which compliance with the principle of non-refoulement is examined – Return decision indicating several potential countries of destination – Detention measure CELEX:62026TN0415: Case T-415/26: Action brought on 2 July 2026 – Molchanov v Council CELEX:62026TN0383: Case T-383/26: Action brought on 19 June 2026 – TZ v EUAA Comments are only visible to subscribers.