Admin MPS / ponedeljek, 22. april 2024 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62022CA0584: Case C-584/22, Kiwi Tours: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof – Germany) – QM v Kiwi Tours GmbH CELEX:62022CA0583: Case C-583/22 PPU: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — criminal proceedings against MV (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA — Article 3(1) — Principle of assimilation of earlier convictions handed down in another Member State — Obligation to ensure that the effects attached to those convictions are equivalent to those attached to previous national convictions — National rules concerning subsequent formation of a cumulative sentence — Multiple offences — Determination of an aggregate sentence — Maximum of 15 years for non-life custodial sentences — Arti CELEX:62022CA0585: Case C-585/22, Staatssecretaris van Financiën (Interest in respect of an intra-group loan): Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 October 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden – Netherlands) – X BV v Staatssecretaris van Finaciën (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of establishment – Article 49 TFEU – Corporation tax – Intra-group cross-border loan for the purposes of financing the acquisition or the extension of an interest in a company not related to the group concerned that becomes, as a result of that transaction, related to that group – Deduction of interest paid on that loan – Loan contracted on an arm’s length basis – Concept of wholly artificial arrangement – Principle of proportionality) Print 45 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62025TJ0077_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 18 March 2026.#Debonair Trading Internacional Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark AOURA – Earlier EU word mark AURA LOEWE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-77/25. CELEX:62024TJ0105_RES: Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre élargie) du 1er juillet 2026.#Airbus Defence and Space SAS et Marlink Events SAS contre Agence européenne de défense.#Marchés publics de services – Procédure d’appel d’offres – Fourniture de communications par satellite, d’équipements et services connexes – Rejet de l’offre d’un soumissionnaire – Attribution du marché à un autre soumissionnaire – Règlement (UE, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Critères d’attribution – Obligation de motivation – Obligation d’examen des offres conforme aux critères énoncés dans les documents de marché – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Égalité de traitement – Responsabilité non contractuelle – Perte d’une chance – Indemnisation.#Affaire T-105/24. CELEX:62025TJ0123_INF: Arrêt du Tribunal (septième chambre) du 29 avril 2026.#Wazdan Innovations ltd. contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne verbale 3 Coins – Motif absolu de refus – Absence de caractère distinctif – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001.#Affaire T-123/25. CELEX:62025TJ0062_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 March 2026.#Shenzen Smoore Technology Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark V VENILO – Earlier EU figurative mark V – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Earlier mark’s lack of enhanced distinctiveness acquired through use – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-62/25. CELEX:62025TJ0349_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 22 April 2026.#Mariano Barranco Rodriguez and Pablo Barranco Schnitzler v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark G MOTION – Earlier EU figurative mark GM Germany Motions – Relative grounds for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-349/25. CELEX:62025TJ0052_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 April 2026.#Laboratorios ACPG, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-52/25. CELEX:62024TJ0225_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Huhtamaki Holding Sàrl v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to State aid procedures – Advance tax agreements – Refusal of access – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – General presumption of confidentiality – Not irrebuttable – Overriding public interest – Principle of sound administration – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-225/24. CELEX:62025TJ0114_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 March 2026.#MAX magazín s. r. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark MAX – Genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-114/25. CELEX:62025CO0766_INF: Order of the Court of 24 March 2026.#Capella EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-766/25 P. CELEX:62023TJ0290_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 October 2025.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG v Single Resolution Board.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents concerning the adoption by the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of a resolution scheme for Sberbank d.d. – Decisions of the SRB Appeal Panel concerning confirmatory decisions of the SRB refusing access – Partial refusal of access – Exception relating to the protection of the financial, monetary or economic policy of the European Union or of a Member State – Fourth indent of Article 4(1)(a) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party – First indent of Article 4(2) of Regulation CELEX:62024TJ0167_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 February 2026.#DG v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation and European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation.#Case T-167/24. CELEX:62025TJ0578_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#Doors Bulgaria EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing doors – Disclosure of the earlier design – Proof of the disclosure – Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-578/25. CELEX:62025TJ0615_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#Veikkaus Oy v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark FOR BETTER GAMING – VEIKKAUS – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Element of the mark having distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-615/25. CELEX:62025TO0582(01)_INF: Order of the President of the General Court of 8 January 2026.#Nathalie Yamb v Council of the European Union.#Case T-582/25 R. CELEX:62024TJ0480_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 July 2025.#Marion Le Pen, en qualité de héritière de Jean-Marie Le Pen and Others v European Parliament.#Case T-480/24. CELEX:62024CO0066_INF: Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 4 mai 2026.#Higreen Power Srl contre Gestore dei Servizi Energetici (GSE) SpA e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Environnement – Promotion de l’utilisation de l’énergie produite à partir de sources renouvelables – Directive 2009/28/CE – Article 3 – Directive (UE) 2018/2001 – Article 4 – Mesures nationales d’incitation à la production d’énergie par des installations éoliennes terrestres, solaires photovoltaïques, hydroélectriques et à gaz résiduaires des stations d’épuration d’eaux usées – Régime d’aide – Aides d’État – Article 108 TFUE – Compétence exclusive de la Commission européenne pour statuer sur la compatibilité de mesures d’aide avec le marché intéri CELEX:62025TJ0403_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#Groupvet EE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition Proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark ALFAVET – Earlier EU figurative mark alfavet – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-403/25. CELEX:62025TJ0579_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#Doors Bulgaria EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing doors – Disclosure of the earlier design – Proof of the disclosure – Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-579/25. CELEX:62025TJ0377_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 March 2026.#Effeemme Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-377/25. CELEX:62025TJ0124_INF: Arrêt du Tribunal (septième chambre) du 29 avril 2026.#Wazdan Innovations ltd. contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne verbale 5 Coins – Motif absolu de refus – Absence de caractère distinctif – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001.#Affaire T-124/25. Comments are only visible to subscribers.