Admin MPS / ponedeljek, 17. junij 2024 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62022CA0301: Case C-301/22, Sweetman: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 April 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland) – Ireland) – Peter Sweetman v An Bord Pleanála, Ireland and the Attorney General CELEX:62022CA0299: Case C-299/22, Tez Tour: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas – Lithuania) – M. D. v UAB Tez Tour CELEX:62022CA0303: Case C-303/22, CROSS Zlín: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Brně — Czech Republic) — CROSS Zlín, a.s. v Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Procedures for the review of the award of public supply and public works contracts — Directive 89/665/EEC — Access to review procedures — Articles 2(3) and 2a(2) — Obligation for Member States to provide for a review procedure with suspensive effect — Review body of first instance — Review relating to a contract award decision — Article 2(9) — Body responsible for review procedures of a non-judicial character — Conclusion of a public contract before lodging of a judicial action against a decision by that body — Ar Print 15 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62024CJ0603: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#Stellantis Portugal SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC – Point 1 of Article 2 – Liability to VAT – Supply of services effected for consideration – Criteria – Intra-group relationships – Adjustments of the transfer prices of motor vehicles between manufacturers and distributors – Account taken of the after-sales costs of repair of those vehicles incurred by the distributors – Existence of a direct link between the supply of services and the consideration actually received – Existence of a legal relationship pursuant to which there is reciprocal performance.#Case C-603/24. CELEX:62025TC0366: Opinion of Advocate General Martín y Pérez de Nanclares delivered on 13 May 2026.### CELEX:62025CC0227: Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 13 May 2026.### CELEX:62025CJ0322: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#SWEDISH MATCH – FÓSFOROS DE PORTUGAL, S.A. v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – General arrangements for products subject to excise duty – Directive 92/12/EEC – Tax markings – Article 21 – National legislation limiting the automatic justification of the destruction of 2% of the tax markings used annually during the production process to the destruction which occurred on the national territory – Proportionality.#Case C-322/25. CELEX:62025CJ0286: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#BRANDL Mezőgazdasági, Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft. v Agrárminisztérium.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Liability of a Member State in the event of infringement of EU law – Cancellation, by operation of law, of rights of usufruct over properties contrary to Article 63 TFEU and Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Restoration of those rights following a judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Compensation for the damage suffered – National rules providing for financial compensation calculated solely on the basis of the market value of those properties at the time of deletion of the rights of usufruct – Requirement of adequate compensation for the damage suffe CELEX:62020TJ0522(01)_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 May 2026.#Carpatair SA v European Commission.#State aid – Aviation sector – Measures implemented by Romania in favour of Timișoara Airport – Measures implemented by Timișoara Airport in favour of Wizz Air and airlines using that airport – Decision finding, in part, that there was no State aid in favour of Timișoara Airport and airlines using that airport – Airport charges – Action for annulment – Standing to bring proceedings – Individual concern – No substantial effect on the competitive position – Partial inadmissibility – Article 107(1) TFEU – Error of law – Selective nature – Advantage.#Case T-522/20 RENV. CELEX:62024CJ0576_INF: Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 16 octobre 2025.#TO contre Agence de l’Union européenne pour l’asile (AUEA).#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Agents temporaires – Résiliation du contrat – Rupture du lien de confiance – Harcèlement moral.#Affaire C-576/24 P. CELEX:62025CJ0225: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#KORFIN, s.r.o and SEMPIOLA INVEST LIMITED v SLOVNAFT, a.s.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Company law – Directive 2004/25/EC – Takeover bid – Article 2(1)(a) – Squeeze-out of holders of securities – Offer made by a person controlling the offeree company – Making of the offer following the acquisition of such control – Lack of voluntary nature of the takeover bid.#Case C-225/25. CELEX:62024CJ0877: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#X and Minister van Asiel en Migratie, anciennement Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v Y.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals – Directive 2008/115/EC – Articles 6, 8 and 9 – Illegally staying third-country nationals imprisoned for a long term or for life – Possibility of adopting a return decision – Procedural safeguards.#Case C-877/24. CELEX:62025TJ0286: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#Mikail Safarbekovich Gutseriev v Council of the European Union.#Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures taken in response to the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in Russia’s aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintaining the applicant’s name on the lists – Error of assessment.#Case T-286/25. CELEX:62025TO0671: Ordonnance du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 11 mai 2026.#TNG Stadtnetz GmbH contre Commission européenne.#Recours en annulation – Aides d’État – Fonds publics pour le développement de réseaux à haut débit – Plainte – Examen préliminaire d’une prétendue aide d’État illégale – Lettre d’information – Article 24, paragraphe 2, du règlement (UE) 2015/1589 – Acte préparatoire – Acte non susceptible de recours – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-671/25. CELEX:62025TJ0150: Urteil des Gerichts (Fünfte erweiterte Kammer) vom 13. Mai 2026.#Zollamt Österreich gegen G GmbH.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Zollunion – Zollkodex der Union – Recht zur Einlegung eines Rechtsbehelfs – Art. 44 Abs. 4 der Verordnung Nr. 952/2013 – Entscheidung über eine verbindliche Zolltarifauskunft – Gerichtlicher Rechtsbehelf – Berichtigung – Rückwirkung.#Rechtssache T-150/25. CELEX:62025TJ0105: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#Kutxabank, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark K. – Earlier EU figurative marks k and k kutxabank kredit – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Lack of similarity of the services – Lack of similarity of the signs – Cross-claim.#Case T-105/25. CELEX:62025TJ0390: Arrêt du Tribunal (deuxième chambre) du 13 mai 2026.#Ixo Restauración, SL contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#* Langue de procédure : l’espagnol. Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Marque de l’Union européenne figurative MUKA – Marque nationale verbale antérieure LAMUCCA – Cause de nullité relative – Risque de confusion – Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Usage sérieux de la marque antérieure – Article 64, paragraphes 2 et 3, du règlement 2017/1001 – Proportionnalité – Obligation de motivation».#Affaire T-390/25. CELEX:62024TJ0593: Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 13 mai 2026.#Brucella Green Vac, SL contre Commission européenne.#Recherche et développement technologique – Programme-cadre pour la recherche et l’innovation “Horizon 2020” (2014-2020) – Recouvrement des sommes indûment versées au titre d’une convention de subvention – Résiliation de la convention – Décision formant titre exécutoire – Article 299 TFUE – Principe de bonne administration – Confiance légitime – Proportionnalité – Règlement (UE, Euratom) 2018/1046.#Affaire T-593/24. CELEX:62024CJ0488_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#D.V. v MB „Kigas“.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2011/83/EU – Article 5(1)(a) and (c) – Information requirements for contracts other than distance or off-premises contracts – Obligation on the trader to inform the consumer of the main characteristics of the service – Customs duties – Obligation on the trader to inform the consumer of the total price of the service – Additional charges – Content of the information to be provided to the consumer – Convention on the Contract for the International Carriage of Goods by Road (CMR) – Articles 6 and 11.#Case C-488/24. CELEX:62025TJ0024: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#Les Éditions Albert René v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Obelix – Earlier EU word mark OBELIX – Relative ground for invalidity – Reputation of the earlier mark – Link between the marks at issue – Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-24/25. CELEX:62020TJ0522(01): Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 May 2026.#Carpatair SA v European Commission.#State aid – Aviation sector – Measures implemented by Romania in favour of Timișoara Airport – Measures implemented by Timișoara Airport in favour of Wizz Air and airlines using that airport – Decision finding, in part, that there was no State aid in favour of Timișoara Airport and airlines using that airport – Airport charges – Action for annulment – Standing to bring proceedings – Individual concern – No substantial effect on the competitive position – Partial inadmissibility – Article 107(1) TFEU – Error of law – Selective nature – Advantage.#Case T-522/20 RENV. CELEX:62025CO0526_INF: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 March 2026.#XV v Volkswagen AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bezirksgericht Steyr.#Case C-526/25. CELEX:62025TO0548: Beschluss des Gerichts (Fünfte Kammer) vom 11. Mai 2026.#TNG Stadtnetz GmbH gegen Europäische Kommission.#Untätigkeitsklage – Staatliche Beihilfen – Öffentliche Mittel für den Ausbau von Breitbandnetzen – Beschwerde – Vorläufige Prüfung einer mutmaßlichen rechtswidrigen staatlichen Beihilfe – Unterrichtungsschreiben – Art. 24 Abs. 2 der Verordnung (EU) 2015/1589 – Stellungnahme der Kommission – Unzulässigkeit.#Rechtssache T-548/25. Comments are only visible to subscribers.