Related articles

• CELEX:62025CO0851_INF: Order of the Court of 9 June 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-851/25 P.
• CELEX:62025CO0883_INF: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 May 2026.#María del Pilar Galindo Giralt v Kingdom of Spain.#Case C-883/25.
• CELEX:62025CO0502_INF: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#„YETTEL BULGARIA“ EAD v FB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Case C-502/25.
• CELEX:62024CJ0518_INF: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#European Commission v Hellenic Republic.#Case C-518/24.
• CELEX:62025CO0850_INF: Order of the Court of 9 June 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-850/25 P.
• CELEX:62025CO0582(01)_INF: Order of the General Court (Single Judge), M. Biltgen François of 4 May 2026.#Alireza Malekzadeh Arasteh v European Commission.#Interim relief – Appeal – Application for interim measures – Dismissal of the main action – No need to adjudicate.#Case C-582/25 P-R.
• CELEX:32026R0382R(04)
• CELEX:62025TA0424: Cases T-424/25 to T-428/25 and T-439/25 to T-443/25: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – KJ and Others v Europol (Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Fixed-term contract – Europol decision concerning the extension of contractual relationships up to 10 years – Exclusion of contract staff who have already been renewed – Rejection of the request for an additional year of service – Plea of illegality – Equal treatment – Temporal application of the rules of substantive law – Legal certainty – Liability)
• CELEX:62025TB0490: Case T-490/25: Order of the General Court of 24 June 2026 – Roja Parfums v EUIPO – Laurice El Badry Rahme (Bond No. 9 Manhattan)
• CELEX:62025TB0464: Case T-464/25: Order of the General Court of 30 June 2026 – Tokareva v Council
• CELEX:62025TA0762: Case T-762/25: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2026 – Phoenix Pharma v EUIPO (Be the Heartbeat of Healthcare) (EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark Be the Heartbeat of Healthcare – Absolute ground for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
• CELEX:62026TB0108: Case T-108/26 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 30 June 2026 – QS v Commission (Application for interim measures – Public procurement – Exclusion from procurement and award procedures governed by Regulations (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 and (EU) 2018/1877 or from being selected to implement EU funds – Publication of information – Application for suspension of operation – Prima facie case – Urgency – Balancing of interests)
• CELEX:62025TA0040: Case T-40/25: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – DecoTrend v EUIPO – B.K.Licht (Lampshade) (EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a lampshade – Earlier designs appearing in Swiss and United States patent specifications – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Elements of patent specifications containing the earlier designs to be taken into account when assessing the overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)
• CELEX:62024TA0538: Case T-538/24: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2026 – Ryanair v Commission (Italy; amended aid scheme; COVID-19) (State aid – Italian air transport market – Extension and amendment of a compensation scheme for airlines with an Italian operating licence – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Eligibility condition relating to a minimum remuneration requirement for employees whose home base is located in Italy – Principle of non-discrimination – Free provision of services – Freedom of establishment – Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 – Assessment of damage – Causal link – Obligation to state reasons)
• CELEX:62025TA0100: Cases T-100/25, T-102/25 and T-103/25: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – Testa and Others v EPPO (Civil Service – European Delegated Prosecutor – Remuneration – Allowance provided for under national law for prosecutors temporarily assigned to a public prosecutor’s office other than their office of origin – Request for an additional top-up allowance – Refusal of the request – Liability)
• CELEX:62025TA0615: Case T-615/25: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – Veikkaus v EUIPO (FOR BETTER GAMING – VEIKKAUS) (EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark FOR BETTER GAMING – VEIKKAUS – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Element of the mark having distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001)
• CELEX:62024TA0105: Case T-105/24: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – Airbus Defence and Space and Marlink Events v EDA (Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Provision of satellite communications, equipment and related services – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Award of the contract to another tenderer – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Award criteria – Obligation to state reasons – Obligation to examine tenders in accordance with the criteria set out in the procurement documents – Manifest error of assessment – Equal treatment – Non-contractual liability – Loss of opportunity – Compensation)
• CELEX:62025TA0041: Case T-41/25: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – DecoTrend v EUIPO – Light Tec (String of lights) (EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a string of lights – Grounds for invalidity – Failure to comply with the requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – No individual character – Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002 – Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion – Article 63(1) of Regulation No 6/2002)
• CELEX:62024TA0493: Case T-493/24: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – Alhares for Security Services and Occupational Safety v EUBAM Libya (Public service contracts – Negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice – Private security services – Decision not to include the applicant among the pre-selected operators – Point (c) of the second subparagraph of point 11.1 and point 39.2 of Annex I to Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Equal treatment – Principle of non-discrimination)
• CELEX:62025TA0309: Case T-309/25: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2026 – SCM Biogroup v EUIPO – Bio Group Medical System (BIO-GROUP MEDICAL SYSTEM) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark BIO-GROUP MEDICAL SYSTEM – Earlier EU figurative mark BIOGROUP – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)