Admin MPS / petek, 29. september 2023 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62021TJ0694_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 July 2023.#aTmos Industrielle Lüftungstechnik GmbH, Düsseldorf v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-694/21. CELEX:62021TJ0694: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 July 2023.#aTmos Industrielle Lüftungstechnik GmbH, Düsseldorf v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-694/21. CELEX:62021TJ0696: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#Les Bordes Golf International v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-696/21. Print 43 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62025CO0851_INF: Order of the Court of 9 June 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-851/25 P. CELEX:62025CO0883_INF: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 May 2026.#María del Pilar Galindo Giralt v Kingdom of Spain.#Case C-883/25. CELEX:62025CO0502_INF: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#„YETTEL BULGARIA“ EAD v FB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Case C-502/25. CELEX:62024CJ0518_INF: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#European Commission v Hellenic Republic.#Case C-518/24. CELEX:62025CO0850_INF: Order of the Court of 9 June 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-850/25 P. CELEX:62025CO0582(01)_INF: Order of the General Court (Single Judge), M. Biltgen François of 4 May 2026.#Alireza Malekzadeh Arasteh v European Commission.#Interim relief – Appeal – Application for interim measures – Dismissal of the main action – No need to adjudicate.#Case C-582/25 P-R. CELEX:32026R0382R(04) CELEX:62026CN0323: Case C-323/26, Protectra: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Leipzig (Germany) lodged on 14 April 2026 – Protectra GmbH v sprd.net AG CELEX:62026CN0496: Case C-496/26, Civinity Mājas: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 18 May 2026 – Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs v AS Civinity Mājas CELEX:62026TN0374: Case T-374/26: Action brought on 8 June 2026 – Kesaev v Council CELEX:62025TA0415: Case T-415/25: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – KH v Commission (Civil service – Temporary staff – Recruitment – Internal competition COM/AST4/2023 – Decision to exclude the applicant from the competition – Failure to attend the oral test on health grounds – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Principle of sound administration – Liability – Non-material damage) CELEX:62025TA0356: Case T-356/25, Rapera: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 8 July 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Dioikitiko Protodikeio Thessalonikis – Greece) – AY v Anexartiti Archi Dimosion Esodon (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of VAT – Tax representative appointed as the person liable for payment of VAT – Article 204 of Directive 2006/112/EC – Joint and several liability – Article 205 of Directive 2006/112 – National legislation appointing the tax representative as liable for payment of VAT and providing for his or her joint and several liability – Proportionality) CELEX:62026CN0517: Case C-517/26, Aranzadi La Ley: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 21 May 2026 – Aranzadi La Ley S.A.U. v VLex Networks, S.L. CELEX:62026CA0182: Case C-182/26 PPU, Hardeker: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Haarlem – Netherlands) – DL v Minister van Asiel en Migratie (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Immigration policy – Return of third-country nationals staying illegally in a Member State – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 3(3) – Country of destination – Article 5 – Principle of non-refoulement – Article 15 – Detention for the purpose of removal – Review of compliance with the conditions governing lawfulness – Time at which compliance with the principle of non-refoulement is examined – Return decision indicating several potential countries of destination – Detention measure CELEX:62026TN0415: Case T-415/26: Action brought on 2 July 2026 – Molchanov v Council CELEX:62026TN0383: Case T-383/26: Action brought on 19 June 2026 – TZ v EUAA CELEX:62024TA0654: Case T-654/24: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – Attilah v EUIPO – Bella Tawziaa II and Groupe Bellakhdar (4011 B552) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark 4011 B552 – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) CELEX:62026CN0726: Case C-726/26 P: Appeal brought on 1 July 2026 by Red Bull GmbH, Red Bull France SASU and Red Bull Nederland BV against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, sitting with five Judges) delivered on 22 April 2026 in Case T-682/24, Red Bull GmbH and Others v Commission CELEX:62026CA0024: Case C-24/26 PPU, Casotta: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d’appello di Roma – Italy) – Criminal proceedings against CV (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2012/29/EU – Minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime – Articles 6, 10 and 18 – Right to receive information about the case and right to be heard – National legislation providing for an extraordinary remedy, whereby a person convicted in absentia may have a conviction which has become final quashed – No recognition of the right of the victim to be informed of the application for th CELEX:62025TB0844: Case T-844/25 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 22 June 2026 – Biohaven Bioscience Ireland and Biohaven Therapeutics v EMA (Interim relief – Medicinal products for human use – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Withdrawal of the application for marketing authorisation for Dazluma – Publication of the assessment report – Application for suspension of operation – Prima facie case – Urgency – Weighing up of interests) Comments are only visible to subscribers.