Related articles

• CELEX:62025CO0266:           Ordonnance de rectification du 21 octobre 2026.#I-Sete - Inovação, Soluções Económicas e Tecnologias Ecológicas, Lda. contre EDIA- Empresa de Desenvolvimento e Infra-estruturas do Alqueva, S.A.#Rectification d’arrêt.#Affaires jointes C-266/25 et C-267/25.
• CELEX:62026CO0446_SUM: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 July 2026.#RI v Openbaar Ministerie.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of conducting a criminal prosecution or executing custodial sentences – Article 6(1) – Issuing judicial authority – Article 8(1)(c) – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office on the basis of a national arrest warrant issued by a court – No judicial review concerning the issue of the European arrest warrant –
• CELEX:62024CJ0857_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#daa plc, anciennement Dublin Airport Authority plc and Others v Irish Aviation Authority and Airport Coordination Limited.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Irlande).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 – Allocation of slots at European Union airports – Article 6 – Coordination parameters – Determination taking account of relevant technical, operational and environmental constraints – Urban planning rules – Limit on the annual number of air passengers – Article 8 – Process of slot allocation – Historic slots – Grandfather rights – Articles 16 and 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-857/24.
• CELEX:62024TJ0460_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 September 2026.#Polina Sergeevna Gagarina v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘support of actions which undermine the territorial integrity of Ukraine’ – Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 269/201
• CELEX:62025TJ0205_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 October 2026.#Giulio Cesare Rizza v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Form annexed to a request for assistance sent by a national competition authority to the national competition authority of another Member State – Partial refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – Overriding public interest.#Case T-205/25.
• CELEX:62024TJ0203_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Zalando SE v European Commission.#Case T-203/24.
• CELEX:62025TJ0371_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Dentek Oral Care, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark dentix – Earlier EU word marks DENTEK and earlier EU figurative marks DenTek – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-371/25.
• CELEX:62025TJ0302_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 September 2026.#Van Eck Associates Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark MARKETVECTOR INDEXES – Earlier EU word mark VECTOR FUND – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character – Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-302/25.
• CELEX:62025CJ0133_INF:           Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#PV contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Pension d’ancienneté – Conditions d’octroi – Statut des fonctionnaires de l’Union européenne – Article 77 – Durée minimale de service – Absences injustifiées ou irrégulières – Article 59, paragraphe 3 – Article 60 – Imputation des absences irrégulières ou injustifiées sur la durée du congé annuel – Conséquences en cas d’épuisement dudit congé – Perte du bénéfice de la rémunération pour la période correspondant aux absences irrégulières ou injustifiées – Privation de plein droit du bénéfice de l’acquisition de droits à pension d’ancienneté pour la période concernée.#Affaire C-133/25 P.
• CELEX:62024CJ0309_INF: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Roberto Passalacqua v European Commission.#Case C-309/24 P.
• CELEX:62026CO0222:           Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 19 octobre 2026.#Prokuratura Regionalna w Lublinie contre HG e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Nécessité d’une interprétation du droit de l’Union pour que la juridiction de renvoi puisse rendre son jugement – Absence – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-222/26.
• CELEX:62025TJ0683_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 September 2026.#Freie Sachsen v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-683/25.
• CELEX:62024TJ0416_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2026.#ES v European Commission.#Civil service – Recruitment – Internal competition COM/AD/03/22 (AD 5) – Decision not to admit the applicant to the next stage of the competition – Principle of good administration – Duty of diligence and duty of care – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-416/24.
• CELEX:62026CO0111_INF: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 14 July 2026.#VOICE – Bundesverband der IT-Anwender eV v Cloud Infrastructure Services Providers in Europe (CISPE) and European Commission.#Appeal – Action for annulment – Application to intervene – Admissibility of the request – Time limit for lodging – Method for calculating the time limit – Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union – Extension of the time limit on account of distance – Out of time – Effective judicial protection – Principle of equal treatment.#Case C-111/26 P(I).
• CELEX:32026D2457: Council Decision (EU) 2026/2457 of 26 October 2026 on the signing of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and Canada pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (‘GATT 1994’) relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff-rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union
• CELEX:32019L0882R(05)
• CELEX:32019R2144R(06)
• CELEX:32019R0877R(05)
• CELEX:32024R1183R(07)
• CELEX:32026D2456: Decision (EU) 2026/2456 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 October 2026 on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers following an application from Finland – EGF/2026/003 FI/Valmet Automotive