Admin MPS / ponedeljek, 01. avgust 2022 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62021TA0744: Case T-744/21: Judgment of the General Court of 8 June 2022 — Medela v EUIPO (MAXFLOW) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark MAXFLOW — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) CELEX:62021TA0743: Case T-743/21: Judgment of the General Court of 5 February 2025 – Ryanair v Commission (TAP II; rescue aid; COVID-19) (State aid – Portuguese air transport market – Rescue aid granted by Portugal to TAP SGPS – State loan – Decision not to raise any objections – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Admissibility – Eligibility – Point 22 of the Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring undertakings in difficulty – Company belonging to a group – Intrinsic difficulties not resulting from an arbitrary allocation of costs within the group – Difficulties which are too serious to be dealt with by the group itself – Appropriateness of the aid – Proportionality – Weighing up of the positive and negative effects – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services CELEX:62021TA0745: Case T-745/21: Judgment of the General Court of 26 July 2023 — Rotkäppchen-Mumm Sektkellereien v EUIPO — Cantina San Donaci (Passo Lungo) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Passo Lungo — Earlier national word mark Doppio Passo — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) Print 33 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62025CC0300: Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 2 July 2026.### CELEX:62025CJ0261: Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 2 juillet 2026.#Bank BPH S.A. et Raiffeisen Bank International AG contre AS e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Directive 93/13/CEE – Article 6, paragraphe 1, et article 7, paragraphe 1 – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Effets de la constatation du caractère abusif d’une clause – Invalidation du contrat – Action en restitution engagée par le professionnel – Délai de prescription de l’action du professionnel – Point de départ – Principe d’équivalence – Principe d’effectivité – Principe de sécurité juridique – Principe de proportionnalité – Droit à une protection juridictionnelle effective – Enrichissement sans cause.#Affaires jointes C-261/25 et C-262/25. CELEX:62022CJ0738_RES: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 July 2026.#Google LLC and Alphabet Inc. v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Market for online general search services – Market for the licensing of smart mobile operating systems – Market for online app stores for the Android mobile operating system – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – Contractual restrictions – Tying – Exclusionary effects – Relevance of context – Counterfactual scenario – As-efficient competitor – Payments subject to exclusive pre-installation – Obstruction of the development and distribution of Android forks – Single and continuous infringement – Fine – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case C-738/22 P. CELEX:62024CJ0427: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 July 2026.#Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs Frankfurt am Main eV v Diagramm Halbach GmbH & Co. KG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medical devices – Regulation (EU) 2017/745 – Obligations of distributors before making a device available on the market – Identification wristbands intended to be worn by patients in the healthcare sector – No CE marking and no EU declaration of conformity – Concept of ‘medical device’ – Concept of ‘intended purpose’.#Case C-427/24. CELEX:62025CJ0067: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 July 2026.#Staatsanwaltschaft Saarbrücken v R and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the Russian Federation’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Article 2f(1) – Concept of ‘operator’ – Prohibition on broadcasting content by the legal persons, entities or bodies listed in Annex XV to Regulation No 833/2014 – Broadcasting of that content by natural persons on a website generating revenue solely in the form of voluntary contributions.#Case C-67/25. CELEX:62025CC0383: Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 2 July 2026.### CELEX:62025CJ0067_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 July 2026.#Staatsanwaltschaft Saarbrücken v R and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the Russian Federation’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Article 2f(1) – Concept of ‘operator’ – Prohibition on broadcasting content by the legal persons, entities or bodies listed in Annex XV to Regulation No 833/2014 – Broadcasting of that content by natural persons on a website generating revenue solely in the form of voluntary contributions.#Case C-67/25. CELEX:62025CJ0409: Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 2 juillet 2026.#CL contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Procédure d’invalidité – Commission d’invalidité – Refus de reconnaissance de l’origine professionnelle de l’invalidité – Réclamation – Dépôt de documents médicaux postérieurement à la date des conclusions de la commission d’invalidité – Inadmissibilité – Régularité de la procédure – Obligation de motivation.#Affaire C-409/25 P. CELEX:62022CJ0738: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 July 2026.#Google LLC and Alphabet Inc. v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Market for online general search services – Market for the licensing of smart mobile operating systems – Market for online app stores for the Android mobile operating system – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – Contractual restrictions – Tying – Exclusionary effects – Relevance of context – Counterfactual scenario – As-efficient competitor – Payments subject to exclusive pre-installation – Obstruction of the development and distribution of Android forks – Single and continuous infringement – Fine – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case C-738/22 P. CELEX:62025CJ0447: Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 2 juillet 2026.#Surovina RECE d.o.o. contre Pest Vármegyei Kormányhivatal.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Environnement – Déchets – Règlement (CE) n° 1013/2006 – Article 12, paragraphe 1, sous a) – Directive 2008/98/CE – Transfert – Objections aux transferts de déchets destinés à être valorisés – Pouvoir de l’autorité compétente de l’État membre de destination de formuler des objections au transfert – Motifs – Non-conformité aux plans nationaux de gestion des déchets.#Affaire C-447/25. CELEX:62025CC0530: Conclusions de l'avocat général M. A. Biondi, présentées le 2 juillet 2026.### CELEX:62024TJ0591: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#Sandoz AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark ARYUNA – Earlier Benelux and national word marks ARMUNIA – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Court.#Case T-591/24. CELEX:62025TJ0173: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#BT Global Services Belgium v European Commission.#Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Trans-European Services for Telematics between Administrations – New Generation Extension (TESTA-ng III) – Negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice – Article 164(5)(f) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 and point (c) of the second subparagraph of point 11.1 of Annex I to Regulation 2018/1046 – Extreme urgency – Unforeseeable events not attributable to the contracting authority – Transparency – Equal treatment.#Case T-173/25. CELEX:62025TJ0100: Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 1er juillet 2026.#Francesco Testa e.a. contre Parquet européen.#Fonction publique – Procureur européen délégué – Rémunération – Indemnité prévue en droit national pour les procureurs affectés temporairement à un parquet différent de celui d’origine – Demande de montant complémentaire – Rejet de la demande – Responsabilité.#Affaires T-100/25, T-102/25 et T-103/25. CELEX:62024TJ0493: Arrêt du Tribunal (troisième chambre élargie) du 1er juillet 2026.#Alhares for Security Services and Occupational Safety contre Mission d'assistance de l'Union européenne pour une gestion intégrée des frontières en Libye (EUBAM Libya).#Marchés publics de services – Procédure négociée sans publication préalable d’un avis de marché – Prestation de services de sécurité privée – Décision de ne pas inclure le requérant parmi les opérateurs présélectionnés – Point 11.1, second alinéa, sous c), et point 39.2 de l’annexe I du règlement (UE, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Égalité de traitement – Principe de non-discrimination.#Affaire T-493/24. CELEX:62024TJ0654_RES: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#Driss El Hakmaoui Attilah v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark 4011 B552 – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.#Case T-654/24. CELEX:62025CO0875: Order of the Court of 24 June 2026.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG v Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-875/25 P. CELEX:62025TJ0040: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a lampshade – Earlier designs appearing in Swiss and United States patent specifications – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Elements of patent specifications containing the earlier designs to be taken into account when assessing the overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-40/25. CELEX:62025CO0874: Order of the Court of 24 June 2026.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG v Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-874/25 P. CELEX:62025TJ0424: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#KJ and Others v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Fixed-term contract – Europol decision concerning the extension of contractual relationships up to 10 years – Exclusion of contract staff who have already been renewed – Rejection of the request for an additional year of service – Plea of illegality – Equal treatment – Temporal application of the rules of substantive law – Legal certainty – Liability.#Cases T-424/25 to T-428/25 and T-439/25 to T-443/25. Comments are only visible to subscribers.