Admin MPS / ponedeljek, 01. avgust 2022 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62021TA0744: Case T-744/21: Judgment of the General Court of 8 June 2022 — Medela v EUIPO (MAXFLOW) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark MAXFLOW — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) CELEX:62021TA0743: Case T-743/21: Judgment of the General Court of 5 February 2025 – Ryanair v Commission (TAP II; rescue aid; COVID-19) (State aid – Portuguese air transport market – Rescue aid granted by Portugal to TAP SGPS – State loan – Decision not to raise any objections – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Admissibility – Eligibility – Point 22 of the Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring undertakings in difficulty – Company belonging to a group – Intrinsic difficulties not resulting from an arbitrary allocation of costs within the group – Difficulties which are too serious to be dealt with by the group itself – Appropriateness of the aid – Proportionality – Weighing up of the positive and negative effects – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services CELEX:62021TA0745: Case T-745/21: Judgment of the General Court of 26 July 2023 — Rotkäppchen-Mumm Sektkellereien v EUIPO — Cantina San Donaci (Passo Lungo) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Passo Lungo — Earlier national word mark Doppio Passo — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) Print 25 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62025TO0653(01): Ordonnance du président du Tribunal du 26 mars 2026.#MX e.a. contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Référé – Politique économique et monétaire – Adoption par la Bulgarie de l’euro au 1er janvier 2026 – Demande de sursis à exécution – Méconnaissance des exigences de forme – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-653/25 RII. CELEX:62025CJ0294: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#UD, VO, GT et KJ, en leur nom propre et en tant qu’associés de la Società Agricola UD e co. and Others v Agenzia Veneta per i pagamenti (AVEPA).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Milk and milk products – Regulation (EC) No 595/2004 – Deliveries made to non-approved purchasers – Article 24(1) – Concept of ‘penalty’ – Additional levy payable by the producer – Levy calculated on the basis of the total quantity of the product delivered – Proportionality – Rights of the defence and right to an effective remedy.#Case C-294/25. CELEX:62024CJ0338: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#LF v Sanofi Pasteur SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Liability for defective products – Directive 85/374/EEC – Article 13 – Relationship with the fault-based liability system – Fault by the producer linked to the defective nature of the product – Article 10 – Starting point of the three-year limitation period in the case of damage consisting in a progressive illness – Concept of ‘becoming aware of the damage’ – Article 11 – Extinguishment of the rights of the injured person – Validity – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right of access to a court.#Case C-338/24. CELEX:62024CC0505: Opinion of Advocate General Biondi delivered on 26 March 2026.### CELEX:62023CJ0696: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#Dmitry Alexandrovich Pumpyanskiy and Others v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 1(1)(e) and Article 2(1)(g) – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 3(1)(g) – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Concept of ‘leading businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Plea of illegality – Articles 7, 16, 17 and 47 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for private and family life, freedom to conduct a business, right to property and right to an effective judi CELEX:62024CJ0618_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 26 mars 2026.#XK e.a. contre SM.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Règlement (UE) no 650/2012 – Articles 1er, 3 et 4 – Champ d’application – Notion de “succession” – Legs légal conféré au titre du soutien apporté par l’aidant au défunt lors du vivant de ce dernier – Compétence générale d’une juridiction d’un État membre pour statuer sur l’ensemble d’une succession.#Affaire C-618/24. CELEX:62024CO0072: Ordonnance de rectification du 19 mars 2026.#HF et WI contre Anexartiti Archi Dimosion Esodon.#Rectification d’arrêt.#Affaires jointes C-72/24 et C-73/24. CELEX:62023CC0734: Schlussanträge der Generalanwältin J. Kokott vom 26. März 2026.### CELEX:62024CJ0338_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 26 mars 2026.#LF contre Sanofi Pasteur SA.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Rapprochement des législations – Responsabilité du fait des produits défectueux – Directive 85/374/CEE – Article 13 – Rapports avec le régime de responsabilité pour faute – Faute du producteur présentant un lien avec la défectuosité du produit – Article 10 – Point de départ du délai de prescription de trois ans en cas de dommage consistant en une maladie évolutive – Notion de « connaissance du dommage » – Article 11 – Extinction des droits de la victime – Validité – Article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Droit d’accès à un juge.#Affaire C-338/24. CELEX:62023CC0737: Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 26 March 2026.### CELEX:62025TO0653: Ordonnance du président du Tribunal du 26 mars 2026.#MS e.a. contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Référé – Politique économique et monétaire – Adoption par la Bulgarie de l’euro au 1er janvier 2026 – Demande de sursis à exécution – Demande de mesures provisoires – Méconnaissance des exigences de forme – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-653/25 R. CELEX:62025CO0365(01): Order of the Court of 19 March 2026.##Article 155 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Failure to adjudicate – None.#Case C-365/25 P-OST. CELEX:62023CJ0696_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#Dmitry Alexandrovich Pumpyanskiy and Others v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 1(1)(e) and Article 2(1)(g) – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 3(1)(g) – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Concept of ‘leading businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Plea of illegality – Articles 7, 16, 17 and 47 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for private and family life, freedom to conduct a business, right to property and right to an effective CELEX:62023CC0736 CELEX:62024CC0888: Opinion of Advocate General Biondi delivered on 26 March 2026.### CELEX:62025CJ0058: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#Fremoluc NV and Association de Promotion des Droits Humains et des Minorités ASBL v Vlaamse Regering.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Concept of ‘aid scheme’ – Further implementing measures – National legislation providing for the adoption of aid schemes aimed at enabling the purchase of immovable property – Implementation of that legislation by municipal regulations.#Case C-58/25. CELEX:62025CJ0819: Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 26 mars 2026.#Madame X et Monsieur Y, agissant en leur nom propre et en leur qualité de représentants légaux de A, B, C et D contre État belge.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Procédure préjudicielle d’urgence – Contrôles aux frontières, asile et immigration – Politique d’immigration – Directive 2003/86/CE – Droit au regroupement familial – Article 13, paragraphe 1 – Obligation d’accorder toute facilité pour obtenir les visas – Visas octroyés sous la condition suspensive d’une comparution personnelle des bénéficiaires aux fins de vérification de leur identité et de l’authenticité des documents produits – Bénéficiaires ne pouvant se déplacer vers un poste diplomatique ou consulaire de l’État membre ayant octroyé les visas – Obligati CELEX:62026CD0108: Decision of the Court of Justice (Reviewing Chamber) of 12 March 2026.##Review.#Case C-108/26 RX. CELEX:62024CJ0357: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#Freistaat Bayern v Euroherc osiguranje d.d.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Coordination of social security systems – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 1(q)(iv) – Concept of ‘competent institution’ – Employer – Article 3(1)(a) – Concept of ‘sickness benefits’ – Continued remuneration in respect of temporary incapacity for work – Article 85(1) – Benefits payable under the legislation of a Member State for injury sustained in the territory of another Member State – Employer’s right of action against a liable third party – Rights of the injured party – Subrogation – Limits.#Case C-357/24. CELEX:62025TO0654: Ordonnance du président du Tribunal du 26 mars 2026.#Stanislav Dobrinov Stoyanov contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Référé – Politique économique et monétaire – Adoption par la Bulgarie de l’euro au 1er janvier 2026 – Demande de sursis à exécution – Méconnaissance des exigences de forme – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-654/25 R. Comments are only visible to subscribers.