Admin MPS / torek, 15. marec 2022 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62021CO0476_INF: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 10 December 2021.#Rezon OOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case C-476/21 P. CELEX:62021CO0475_INF: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 8 December 2021.#Franz Schröder GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-475/21 P. CELEX:62021CO0480: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 July 2022.#W O and J L v Minister for Justice and Equality.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 1(3) – Surrender procedure between Member States – Conditions for execution – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Second paragraph of Article 47 – Fundamental right to a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Systemic or generalised deficiencies – Two-step examination – Criteria for application – Obligation of the executing judicial authority to determine, specifically and precisely, whether there Print 232 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62021TJ0310_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 March 2026.#Air Canada v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Reduction of the fine by the General Court – Refusal of the Commission to pay interest on the overpayment – Limitation period – Starting point of the limitation period – Interruption – Admissibility – Concept of ‘interest’ – Rate applicable.#Case T-310/21. CELEX:62025TJ0296: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 March 2026.#Direktor na TD Mitnitsa Burgas v Lidikar OOD.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Union Customs Code – Import and export procedures – Importation of goods from Canada – Method of determining the customs value – Declared export price of the goods communicated by the Canadian authorities under an international customs cooperation agreement – Concept of ‘data available in the customs territory of the Union’ – Reasonable means – Article 74(3) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Residual or ‘fall-back’ method – Article 144 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447.#Case T-296/25. CELEX:62025TJ0017: Arrêt du Tribunal (sixième chambre) du 25 mars 2026.#Team Beverage AG contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure d’opposition – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne figurative TEAM BEVERAGE – Marque de l’Union européenne verbale antérieure TEAM – Demande de suspension de la procédure administrative – Rejet – Article 71, paragraphe 1, sous a) et b), du règlement délégué (UE) 2018/625 – Motif relatif de refus – Risque de confusion – Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 ».#Affaire T-17/25. CELEX:62025TJ0471: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark NAVIGATE – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-471/25. CELEX:62021TJ0313: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 March 2026.#SAS Cargo Group A/S and Others v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Reduction of the fine by the General Court – Refusal of the Commission to pay interest on the overpayment – Limitation period – Starting point of the limitation period – Interruption – Admissibility – Concept of ‘interest’ – Rate applicable.#Case T-313/21. CELEX:62025TJ0221: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 March 2026.#TUI Belgium NV and Others v Belgische Staat.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of VAT – Transactions subject to VAT – Supply of services for consideration – Exemptions – Standstill clause – Right of Member States to retain certain taxes during a transitional period – Article 28(3)(a) and (4) of Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC and Article 370 of Directive 2006/112/EC – Supply of services by travel agents in relation to travel outside the European Union – Annex E(15) to Sixth Directive 77/388 and Annex X, Part A, point (4), to Directive 2006/112 – Subsequent amendment of the national legislation – No express derogation from the exemption.#Case T-221/25. CELEX:62021TJ0310: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 March 2026.#Air Canada v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Reduction of the fine by the General Court – Refusal of the Commission to pay interest on the overpayment – Limitation period – Starting point of the limitation period – Interruption – Admissibility – Concept of ‘interest’ – Rate applicable.#Case T-310/21. CELEX:62025TJ0411: Arrêt du Tribunal (septième chambre) du 25 mars 2026.#Raquel Maresma Bernal contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne figurative Brief Therapy Center BARCELONA – Motifs absolus de refus – Caractère descriptif – Absence de caractère distinctif – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous b) et c), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001.#Affaire T-411/25. CELEX:62024TJ0545: Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 25 mars 2026.#Implementing Technologies, SL contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de déchéance – Marque de l’Union européenne figurative OSSA – Absence d’usage sérieux de la marque – Article 58, paragraphe 1, sous a), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Période pertinente – Appréciation des preuves – Contrat de licence exclusive – Absence de preuve d’usage pour les produits pour lesquels la marque est enregistrée – Absence de juste motif pour le non-usage.#Affaire T-545/24. CELEX:62024TJ0183: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#DP and DQ v European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority.#Action for damages – Non-contractual liability of the European Union – Origin of the dispute – Limitation period – Admissibility – Article 339 TFEU – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of good administration – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-183/24. CELEX:62021TJ0359: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#ClientEarth AISBL v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents concerning the active substances mancozeb and cypermethrin – Individual positions of the Member States in the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed – Partial refusal of access – Article 4(2) and (3) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process – Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings – Overriding public interest.#Case T-359/21. CELEX:62024TJ0544: Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 25 mars 2026.#Implementing Technologies, SL contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de déchéance – Marque de l’Union européenne figurative OSSA SINCE 1940 – Absence d’usage sérieux de la marque – Article 58, paragraphe 1, sous a), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Période pertinente – Appréciation des preuves – Contrat de licence exclusive – Absence de preuve d’usage pour les produits pour lesquels la marque est enregistrée – Absence de juste motif pour le non-usage.#Affaire T-544/24. CELEX:32024R1143R(05) CELEX:32026D0735: Council Decision (EU) 2026/735 of 17 March 2026 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the European Union, within the EEA Joint Committee concerning an amendment to Annex IX (Financial services) to the EEA Agreement (ESAs Review) (Text with EEA relevance) CELEX:32026R0695R(01) CELEX:32024R2847R(06): Rectificatif au règlement (UE) 2024/2847 du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 23 octobre 2024 concernant des exigences de cybersécurité horizontales pour les produits comportant des éléments numériques et modifiant les règlements (UE) n° 168/2013 et (UE) 2019/1020 et la directive (UE) 2020/1828 (règlement sur la cyberrésilience) (JO L, 2024/2847, 20.11.2024) CELEX:32026D01817: Decision of the selection committee of the European Order of Merit of 2 March 2026 on appointments to the European Order of Merit CELEX:62023CJ0767: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 March 2026.#A. M. v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Scope of the obligation on national courts or tribunals of last instance to make a reference for a preliminary ruling – Exceptions to that obligation – Obligation to state reasons for the concrete application of those exceptions – National legislation conferring on the national court or tribunal of last instance the power to dismiss actions by means of a summary statement of reasons – Conditions required to reason a refusal to make a reference for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-767/23. CELEX:62021CJ0521: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 March 2026.#MJ v AA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Effective legal protection in the fields covered by EU law – Judicial independence – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – National legislation and case-law prohibiting national courts from calling into question the legitimacy of constitutional courts and bodies or from establishing or assessing the lawfulness of the appointment of judges or of their judicial powers – Obligation for a judge hearing an application for the recusal of another judge to ascertain whether the requirement of a ‘tribunal previously established by law’ has been met – Appointment of judge CELEX:62021CJ0521_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 24 mars 2026.#MJ contre AA.#Renvoi préjudiciel – État de droit – Protection juridictionnelle effective dans les domaines couverts par le droit de l’Union – Indépendance des juges – Article 19, paragraphe 1, second alinéa, TUE – Article 47, deuxième alinéa, de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Réglementation et jurisprudence nationales interdisant aux juridictions nationales de remettre en cause la légitimité des juridictions et des organes constitutionnels ou de constater ou d’apprécier la légalité de la nomination des juges ou des pouvoirs juridictionnels de ceux-ci – Obligation pour le juge saisi d’une demande de récusation d’un autre juge de vérifier le respect de l’exigence d’un “tribunal éta Comments are only visible to subscribers.