Admin MPS / sreda, 13. julij 2022 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62021CO0346_INF: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 May 2022.#ING Luxembourg SA v VX.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto.#Case C-346/21. CELEX:62021CO0346: Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 5 mai 2022.#ING Luxembourg SA contre VX.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile et commerciale – Signification et notification des actes judiciaires et extrajudiciaires – Règlement (CE) no 1393/2007 – Article 8 – Information du destinataire, au moyen du formulaire type figurant à l’annexe II de ce règlement, de son droit de refuser la réception d’un acte judiciaire qui n’est pas rédigé ou accompagné d’une traduction dans une langue comprise du destinataire ou dans la langue ou l’une des langues officielles de l’État membre requis – Absence d’utilisation du formulaire type – Conséquences.#Affaire C-346/21. CELEX:62021CO0360_INF: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 6 October 2021.#FCA Italy SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate the significance of an issue of law with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-360/21 P. Print 164 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62025CC0300: Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 2 July 2026.### CELEX:62025CJ0261: Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 2 juillet 2026.#Bank BPH S.A. et Raiffeisen Bank International AG contre AS e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Directive 93/13/CEE – Article 6, paragraphe 1, et article 7, paragraphe 1 – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Effets de la constatation du caractère abusif d’une clause – Invalidation du contrat – Action en restitution engagée par le professionnel – Délai de prescription de l’action du professionnel – Point de départ – Principe d’équivalence – Principe d’effectivité – Principe de sécurité juridique – Principe de proportionnalité – Droit à une protection juridictionnelle effective – Enrichissement sans cause.#Affaires jointes C-261/25 et C-262/25. CELEX:62022CJ0738_RES: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 July 2026.#Google LLC and Alphabet Inc. v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Market for online general search services – Market for the licensing of smart mobile operating systems – Market for online app stores for the Android mobile operating system – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – Contractual restrictions – Tying – Exclusionary effects – Relevance of context – Counterfactual scenario – As-efficient competitor – Payments subject to exclusive pre-installation – Obstruction of the development and distribution of Android forks – Single and continuous infringement – Fine – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case C-738/22 P. CELEX:62024CJ0427: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 July 2026.#Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs Frankfurt am Main eV v Diagramm Halbach GmbH & Co. KG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medical devices – Regulation (EU) 2017/745 – Obligations of distributors before making a device available on the market – Identification wristbands intended to be worn by patients in the healthcare sector – No CE marking and no EU declaration of conformity – Concept of ‘medical device’ – Concept of ‘intended purpose’.#Case C-427/24. CELEX:62025CJ0067: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 July 2026.#Staatsanwaltschaft Saarbrücken v R and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the Russian Federation’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Article 2f(1) – Concept of ‘operator’ – Prohibition on broadcasting content by the legal persons, entities or bodies listed in Annex XV to Regulation No 833/2014 – Broadcasting of that content by natural persons on a website generating revenue solely in the form of voluntary contributions.#Case C-67/25. CELEX:62025CC0383: Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 2 July 2026.### CELEX:62025CJ0067_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 July 2026.#Staatsanwaltschaft Saarbrücken v R and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the Russian Federation’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Article 2f(1) – Concept of ‘operator’ – Prohibition on broadcasting content by the legal persons, entities or bodies listed in Annex XV to Regulation No 833/2014 – Broadcasting of that content by natural persons on a website generating revenue solely in the form of voluntary contributions.#Case C-67/25. CELEX:62025CJ0409: Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 2 juillet 2026.#CL contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Procédure d’invalidité – Commission d’invalidité – Refus de reconnaissance de l’origine professionnelle de l’invalidité – Réclamation – Dépôt de documents médicaux postérieurement à la date des conclusions de la commission d’invalidité – Inadmissibilité – Régularité de la procédure – Obligation de motivation.#Affaire C-409/25 P. CELEX:62022CJ0738: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 July 2026.#Google LLC and Alphabet Inc. v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Market for online general search services – Market for the licensing of smart mobile operating systems – Market for online app stores for the Android mobile operating system – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – Contractual restrictions – Tying – Exclusionary effects – Relevance of context – Counterfactual scenario – As-efficient competitor – Payments subject to exclusive pre-installation – Obstruction of the development and distribution of Android forks – Single and continuous infringement – Fine – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case C-738/22 P. CELEX:62025CJ0447: Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 2 juillet 2026.#Surovina RECE d.o.o. contre Pest Vármegyei Kormányhivatal.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Environnement – Déchets – Règlement (CE) n° 1013/2006 – Article 12, paragraphe 1, sous a) – Directive 2008/98/CE – Transfert – Objections aux transferts de déchets destinés à être valorisés – Pouvoir de l’autorité compétente de l’État membre de destination de formuler des objections au transfert – Motifs – Non-conformité aux plans nationaux de gestion des déchets.#Affaire C-447/25. CELEX:62025CC0530: Conclusions de l'avocat général M. A. Biondi, présentées le 2 juillet 2026.### CELEX:62024TJ0591: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#Sandoz AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark ARYUNA – Earlier Benelux and national word marks ARMUNIA – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Court.#Case T-591/24. CELEX:62025TJ0173: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#BT Global Services Belgium v European Commission.#Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Trans-European Services for Telematics between Administrations – New Generation Extension (TESTA-ng III) – Negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice – Article 164(5)(f) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 and point (c) of the second subparagraph of point 11.1 of Annex I to Regulation 2018/1046 – Extreme urgency – Unforeseeable events not attributable to the contracting authority – Transparency – Equal treatment.#Case T-173/25. CELEX:62025TJ0100: Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 1er juillet 2026.#Francesco Testa e.a. contre Parquet européen.#Fonction publique – Procureur européen délégué – Rémunération – Indemnité prévue en droit national pour les procureurs affectés temporairement à un parquet différent de celui d’origine – Demande de montant complémentaire – Rejet de la demande – Responsabilité.#Affaires T-100/25, T-102/25 et T-103/25. CELEX:62024TJ0493: Arrêt du Tribunal (troisième chambre élargie) du 1er juillet 2026.#Alhares for Security Services and Occupational Safety contre Mission d'assistance de l'Union européenne pour une gestion intégrée des frontières en Libye (EUBAM Libya).#Marchés publics de services – Procédure négociée sans publication préalable d’un avis de marché – Prestation de services de sécurité privée – Décision de ne pas inclure le requérant parmi les opérateurs présélectionnés – Point 11.1, second alinéa, sous c), et point 39.2 de l’annexe I du règlement (UE, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Égalité de traitement – Principe de non-discrimination.#Affaire T-493/24. CELEX:62024TJ0654_RES: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#Driss El Hakmaoui Attilah v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark 4011 B552 – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.#Case T-654/24. CELEX:62025CO0875: Order of the Court of 24 June 2026.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG v Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-875/25 P. CELEX:62025TJ0040: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a lampshade – Earlier designs appearing in Swiss and United States patent specifications – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Elements of patent specifications containing the earlier designs to be taken into account when assessing the overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-40/25. CELEX:62025CO0874: Order of the Court of 24 June 2026.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG v Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-874/25 P. CELEX:62025TJ0424: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#KJ and Others v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Fixed-term contract – Europol decision concerning the extension of contractual relationships up to 10 years – Exclusion of contract staff who have already been renewed – Rejection of the request for an additional year of service – Plea of illegality – Equal treatment – Temporal application of the rules of substantive law – Legal certainty – Liability.#Cases T-424/25 to T-428/25 and T-439/25 to T-443/25. Comments are only visible to subscribers.