Related articles

• CELEX:62024TJ0591: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#Sandoz AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark ARYUNA – Earlier Benelux and national word marks ARMUNIA – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Court.#Case T-591/24.
• CELEX:62025TJ0173: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#BT Global Services Belgium v European Commission.#Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Trans-European Services for Telematics between Administrations – New Generation Extension (TESTA-ng III) – Negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice – Article 164(5)(f) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 and point (c) of the second subparagraph of point 11.1 of Annex I to Regulation 2018/1046 – Extreme urgency – Unforeseeable events not attributable to the contracting authority – Transparency – Equal treatment.#Case T-173/25.
• CELEX:62025TJ0100:           Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 1er juillet 2026.#Francesco Testa e.a. contre Parquet européen.#Fonction publique – Procureur européen délégué – Rémunération – Indemnité prévue en droit national pour les procureurs affectés temporairement à un parquet différent de celui d’origine – Demande de montant complémentaire – Rejet de la demande – Responsabilité.#Affaires T-100/25, T-102/25 et T-103/25.
• CELEX:62024TJ0493:           Arrêt du Tribunal (troisième chambre élargie) du 1er juillet 2026.#Alhares for Security Services and Occupational Safety contre Mission d'assistance de l'Union européenne pour une gestion intégrée des frontières en Libye (EUBAM Libya).#Marchés publics de services – Procédure négociée sans publication préalable d’un avis de marché – Prestation de services de sécurité privée – Décision de ne pas inclure le requérant parmi les opérateurs présélectionnés – Point 11.1, second alinéa, sous c), et point 39.2 de l’annexe I du règlement (UE, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Égalité de traitement – Principe de non-discrimination.#Affaire T-493/24.
• CELEX:62024TJ0654_RES: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#Driss El Hakmaoui Attilah v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark 4011 B552 – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.#Case T-654/24.
• CELEX:62025CO0875: Order of the Court of 24 June 2026.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG v Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-875/25 P.
• CELEX:62025TJ0040: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a lampshade – Earlier designs appearing in Swiss and United States patent specifications – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Elements of patent specifications containing the earlier designs to be taken into account when assessing the overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-40/25.
• CELEX:62025CO0874: Order of the Court of 24 June 2026.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG v Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-874/25 P.
• CELEX:62025TJ0424: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#KJ and Others v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Fixed-term contract – Europol decision concerning the extension of contractual relationships up to 10 years – Exclusion of contract staff who have already been renewed – Rejection of the request for an additional year of service – Plea of illegality – Equal treatment – Temporal application of the rules of substantive law – Legal certainty – Liability.#Cases T-424/25 to T-428/25 and T-439/25 to T-443/25.
• CELEX:62025TJ0040_RES: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a lampshade – Earlier designs appearing in Swiss and United States patent specifications – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Elements of patent specifications containing the earlier designs to be taken into account when assessing the overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-40/25.
• CELEX:62025TJ0615: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#Veikkaus Oy v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark FOR BETTER GAMING – VEIKKAUS – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Element of the mark having distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-615/25.
• CELEX:62024TJ0105:           Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre élargie) du 1er juillet 2026.#Airbus Defence and Space SAS et Marlink Events SAS contre Agence européenne de défense.#Marchés publics de services – Procédure d’appel d’offres – Fourniture de communications par satellite, d’équipements et services connexes – Rejet de l’offre d’un soumissionnaire – Attribution du marché à un autre soumissionnaire – Règlement (UE, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Critères d’attribution – Obligation de motivation – Obligation d’examen des offres conforme aux critères énoncés dans les documents de marché – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Égalité de traitement – Responsabilité non contractuelle – Perte d’une chance – Indemnisation.#Affaire T-105/24.
• CELEX:62025TJ0041:           Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 1er juillet 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne enregistré représentant une guirlande électrique – Motif de nullité – Non-respect des conditions de protection – Article 25, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (CE) no 6/2002 – Absence de caractère individuel – Article 6 du règlement no 6/2002 – Examen d’office des faits – Article 63, paragraphe 1, du règlement no 6/2002.#Affaire T-41/25.
• CELEX:62025TJ0424_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#KJ and Others v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Fixed-term contract – Europol decision concerning the extension of contractual relationships up to 10 years – Exclusion of contract staff who have already been renewed – Rejection of the request for an additional year of service – Plea of illegality – Equal treatment – Temporal application of the rules of substantive law – Legal certainty – Liability.#Cases T-424/25 to T-428/25 and T-439/25 to T-443/25.
• CELEX:62024TJ0654: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#Driss El Hakmaoui Attilah v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark 4011 B552 – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.#Case T-654/24.
• CELEX:62025TJ0415:           Arrêt du Tribunal (troisième chambre) du 1er juillet 2026.#KH contre Commission européenne.#Fonction publique – Agents temporaires – Recrutement – Concours interne COM/AST4/2023 – Décision d’exclure le requérant du concours – Absence de participation à l’épreuve orale pour des raisons de santé – Devoir de sollicitude – Principe de bonne administration – Responsabilité – Préjudice moral.#Affaire T-415/25.
• CELEX:62025TJ0042:           Urteil des Gerichts (Erste Kammer) vom 1. Juli 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Unionsgeschmacksmuster – Nichtigkeitsverfahren – Eingetragenes Unionsgeschmacksmuster, das einen Lampenschirm darstellt – Nichtigkeitsgrund – Nichterfüllung der Schutzvoraussetzungen – Art. 25 Abs. 1 Buchst. b der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 6/2002 – Fehlende Eigenart – Art. 6 der Verordnung Nr. 6/2002 – Ermittlung des Sachverhalts von Amts wegen – Art. 63 Abs. 1 der Verordnung Nr. 6/2002.#Rechtssache T-42/25.
• CELEX:62024TJ0493_RES:           Arrêt du Tribunal (troisième chambre élargie) du 1er juillet 2026.#Alhares for Security Services and Occupational Safety contre Mission d'assistance de l'Union européenne pour une gestion intégrée des frontières en Libye (EUBAM Libya).#Marchés publics de services – Procédure négociée sans publication préalable d’un avis de marché – Prestation de services de sécurité privée – Décision de ne pas inclure le requérant parmi les opérateurs présélectionnés – Point 11.1, second alinéa, sous c), et point 39.2 de l’annexe I du règlement (UE, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Égalité de traitement – Principe de non-discrimination.#Affaire T-493/24.
• CELEX:62025CO0824_INF: Order of the Court of 14 April 2026.#Frutaria Innovation SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-824/25 P.
• CELEX:62025TJ0361: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 1 July 2026.#Brenntag GmbH v Hauptzollamt Duisburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Article 27(1) and (2) of Directive 92/83/EEC – Article 7(1), Article 7(2)(a), Article 20(2) and Article 30 of Directive 2008/118/EC – Irregularity occurring during the movement of excise goods – Movement of goods under a duty suspension arrangement – Levying of excise duty due to the absence of an accompanying document specific to excise goods.#Case T-361/25.