Admin MPS / četrtek, 11. avgust 2022 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62021CJ0242_INF: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 May 2022.#Évariste Boshab v Council of the European Union.#Case C-242/21 P. CELEX:62021CJ0242: Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 12 mai 2022.#Évariste Boshab contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises à l’encontre de certaines personnes et entités au regard de la situation en République démocratique du Congo – Règlement (CE) no 1183/2005 – Article 2 ter et article 9, paragraphe 2 – Décision 2010/788/PESC – Article 3, paragraphe 2, et article 9, paragraphe 2 – Maintien de l’inscription du requérant sur les listes des personnes et entités visées – Décision (PESC) 2018/1940 – Règlement d’exécution (UE) 2018/1931 – Droit d’être entendu.#Affaire C-242/21 P. CELEX:62021CJ0243: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Vierte Kammer) vom 17. November 2022.#„TOYA“ sp. z o.o. und Polska Izba Informatyki i Telekomunikacji gegen Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Telekommunikation – Richtlinie 2002/19/EG (Zugangsrichtlinie) – Art. 8 Abs. 3 – Richtlinie 2014/61/EU – Art. 1 Abs. 3 und 4 und Art. 3 Abs. 5 – Befugnis der nationalen Regulierungsbehörde, regulatorische Vorabverpflichtungen für den Zugang zur physischen Infrastruktur eines Netzbetreibers ohne beträchtliche Marktmacht aufzuerlegen – Fehlen eines Rechtsstreits über den Zugang.#Rechtssache C-243/21. Print 139 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62023CJ0767: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 March 2026.#A. M. v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Scope of the obligation on national courts or tribunals of last instance to make a reference for a preliminary ruling – Exceptions to that obligation – Obligation to state reasons for the concrete application of those exceptions – National legislation conferring on the national court or tribunal of last instance the power to dismiss actions by means of a summary statement of reasons – Conditions required to reason a refusal to make a reference for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-767/23. CELEX:62021CJ0521: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 March 2026.#MJ v AA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Effective legal protection in the fields covered by EU law – Judicial independence – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – National legislation and case-law prohibiting national courts from calling into question the legitimacy of constitutional courts and bodies or from establishing or assessing the lawfulness of the appointment of judges or of their judicial powers – Obligation for a judge hearing an application for the recusal of another judge to ascertain whether the requirement of a ‘tribunal previously established by law’ has been met – Appointment of judge CELEX:62021CJ0521_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 24 mars 2026.#MJ contre AA.#Renvoi préjudiciel – État de droit – Protection juridictionnelle effective dans les domaines couverts par le droit de l’Union – Indépendance des juges – Article 19, paragraphe 1, second alinéa, TUE – Article 47, deuxième alinéa, de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Réglementation et jurisprudence nationales interdisant aux juridictions nationales de remettre en cause la légitimité des juridictions et des organes constitutionnels ou de constater ou d’apprécier la légalité de la nomination des juges ou des pouvoirs juridictionnels de ceux-ci – Obligation pour le juge saisi d’une demande de récusation d’un autre juge de vérifier le respect de l’exigence d’un “tribunal éta CELEX:62025TO0865: Order of the President of the General Court of 23 March 2026.#Europäisch-Iranische Handelsbank AG v Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures against Iran – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Application for suspension of operation – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Inadmissibility.#Case T-865/25 R. CELEX:62023CJ0767_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 24 mars 2026.#A. M. contre Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 267 TFUE – Portée de l’obligation de renvoi préjudiciel des juridictions nationales statuant en dernier ressort – Exceptions à cette obligation – Obligation de motiver l’application concrète de ces exceptions – Réglementation nationale conférant à la juridiction nationale statuant en dernier ressort la faculté de rejeter des recours au moyen d’une motivation sommaire – Conditions requises pour motiver un refus de procéder à un renvoi préjudiciel.#Affaire C-767/23. CELEX:32019R2099R(03) CELEX:32018R0848R(29) CELEX:32026D0730: Council Decision (EU) 2026/730 of 17 March 2026 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union at the 237th session of the Council of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) as regards amendments 3, 12 and 15 to Annex 16, Volume I-III, to the Convention on International Civil Aviation concerning Standards and Recommended Practices relating to environmental protection CELEX:32016L1164R(06) CELEX:62026TN0069: Case T-69/26: Action brought on 2 February 2026 – Oxxo v EUIPO – Ferrarelli (XOXO) CELEX:62026TN0024: Case T-24/26: Action brought on 14 January 2026 – Cerami v Commission CELEX:62025CB0293: Case C-293/25, Moguchev: Order of the Court (Eight Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad – Sofia – Bulgaria) – in the proceedings relating to the execution of the European arrest warrant issued against RT (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Question the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of execution of a custodial sentence – Article 4(6) – Ground for optional non-execution of the European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Article 8(1) – Re CELEX:62024CB0814: Case C- C-814/24, Alexion Pharma Germany: Order of the President of the Second Chamber of the Court of 19 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I – Germany) – Alexion Pharma Germany GmbH v Amgen Technology (Ireland) Unlimited Company, AMGEN GmbH CELEX:62025TA0134: Case T-134/25, D (Air traffic management decision): Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 21 January 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie – Poland) – D S.A. v P S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Compensation to passengers in the event of a long delay or cancellation of a flight – Exemption – Extraordinary circumstances – Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Air traffic management decision – Allocation of delayed departure slots due to adverse weather conditions – Possibility of relying on a flight subsequent to that affected by the occurrence of an extraordinary circumstance) CELEX:62025CN0665: Case C-665/25 P: Appeal brought on 6 October 2025 by Josep Francesc Gómez Jiménez, María del Roser García Núñez and Alba Gómez García against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 21 July 2025 in Case T-445/24, Gómez Jiménez and Others v EUIPO CELEX:62026CN0058: Case C-58/26: Action brought on 4 February 2026 – European Commission v Portuguese Republic CELEX:62025TN0876: Case T-876/25: Action brought on 19 December 2025 – Raja v Commission CELEX:62025CB0304: Case C-304/25, Lidl Bulgaria: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad – Bulgaria) – Lidl Bulgaria EOOD and KO KD v Nachalnik na otdel Operativni deynosti v GD Fiskalen kontrol v Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the factual and legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Requirement to state the relationship between the provisions of European Union law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient details – Manifest inadmissibility) CELEX:62025CB0124: Case C-124/25, Jawowicz: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Apelacyjny w Warszawie – Poland) – VA v BNP Paribas Bank Polska S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 100(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Dispute in the main proceedings which has become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate) CELEX:62025CB0553: Joined Cases C-553/25 and C-558/25, Volkswagen and Audi: Order of the President of the Court of 19 December 2025 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg – Austria) – TF (C-553/25), MO (C 558/25) v Volkswagen AG (C-553/25), Audi AG (C-558/25) Comments are only visible to subscribers.