Admin MPS / ponedeljek, 08. april 2024 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62021CB0594: Case C-594/21, Sixt Leasing: Order of the President of the Court of 11 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main — Germany) — VB v Sixt Leasing SE CELEX:62021CB0592: Case C-592/21: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa — Latvia) — ‘ĒDIENS & KM.LV’ PS v Ieslodzījuma vietu pārvalde, Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Conduct of the procedure — Choice of participants — Selection criteria — Technical and professional capacities — Article 58(4) — Forms of evidence — European Single Procurement Document — Article 59 — Reliance on the capacities of other entities — Article 63(1) — Group of economic operators — Condition relating to professional experience to be satisfied by the member of the group responsible, in the event of CELEX:62021CB0597: Case C-597/21: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Centro Petroli Roma Srl v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 53 and 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Article 267 TFEU — Scope of the obligation on national courts or tribunals of last instance to make a reference for a preliminary ruling — Exceptions to that obligation — Criteria — Situations in which the correct interpretation of EU law is so obvious as to leave no scope for any reasonable doubt — Condition related to the national court or tribunal of last instance being convinced that the matter would be equally obvious to the other courts or tribunals of last Print 19 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62025TO0733: Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 May 2026.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark TOTALLY HANDS FREE – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-733/25. CELEX:62025TO0732: Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 May 2026.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark SLIP-INS – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-732/25. CELEX:62025TO0790: Order of the General Court (Single Judge) of 7 May 2026.#NX v Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union.#Civil service – Staff of the Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union – Recruitment – Vacancy notice CDT-AD5-2025/03 – Rejection of application – Duty to state reasons – Failure to communicate the applicant’s scores.#Case T-790/25. CELEX:62024CJ0636: Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 7 mai 2026.#Sara Makhlouf contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises à l’égard de la République arabe syrienne – Décision 2013/255/PESC – Règlement (UE) no 36/2012 – Gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Inscription du nom de la requérante sur les listes des personnes, des entités et des organismes concernés – Critère de l’appartenance familiale.#Affaire C-636/24 P. CELEX:62022CJ0747_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 May 2026.#KH v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Subsidiary protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 26 – Access to employment – Article 29 – Social welfare – Equal treatment – Social protection measure and access to employment – Condition of residence for a minimum period of 10 years, the final 2 years of which must have been continuous – Indirect discrimination.#Case C-747/22. CELEX:62025CC0199: Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 7 May 2026.### CELEX:62025CC0268: Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 7 May 2026.### CELEX:62024CJ0635: Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 7 mai 2026.#Kinda Makhlouf contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises à l’égard de la République arabe syrienne – Décision 2013/255/PESC – Règlement (UE) no 36/2012 – Gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Inscription du nom de la requérante sur les listes des personnes, des entités et des organismes concernés – Critère de l’appartenance familiale.#Affaire C-635/24 P. CELEX:62024CJ0637: Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 7 mai 2026.#Ghada Mhana contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises à l’égard de la République arabe syrienne – Décision 2013/255/PESC – Règlement (UE) no 36/2012 – Gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Inscription du nom de la requérante sur les listes des personnes, des entités et des organismes concernés – Critère de l’appartenance familiale.#Affaire C-637/24 P. CELEX:62025CC0266: Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 7 May 2026.### CELEX:62024CC0641: Conclusions de l'avocat général M. A. Biondi, présentées le 7 mai 2026.### CELEX:62025CC0276: Opinion of Advocate General Norkus delivered on 7 May 2026.### CELEX:62022CJ0747: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 May 2026.#KH v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Subsidiary protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 26 – Access to employment – Article 29 – Social welfare – Equal treatment – Social protection measure and access to employment – Condition of residence for a minimum period of 10 years, the final 2 years of which must have been continuous – Indirect discrimination.#Case C-747/22. CELEX:62025CC0238: Schlussanträge des Generalanwalts A. Biondi vom 7. Mai 2026.### CELEX:32026D02634: Council Decision of 5 May 2026 on the appointment of the member of the European Statistical Advisory Committee representing the Council CELEX:32026L1024: Directive (EU) 2026/1024 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2026 amending Directive (EU) 2015/2302 to make the protection of travellers more effective and to simplify and clarify certain aspects of that Directive (Text with EEA relevance) CELEX:32019L0879R(10): Rectificatif à la directive (UE) 2019/879 du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 20 mai 2019 modifiant la directive 2014/59/UE en ce qui concerne la capacité d’absorption des pertes et de recapitalisation des établissements de crédit et des entreprises d’investissement et la directive 98/26/CE (JO L 150 du 7.6.2019) CELEX:62025TJ0087_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 May 2026.#Westfälisches Textilwerk Adolf Ahlers Stiftung & Co. KG v European Commission.#Competition – Agreement, decisions and concerted practices – Market for Pierre Cardin-licensed clothing and accessories for men, women and children – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Fine – Error of law – Proportionality – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-87/25. CELEX:62024TJ0185_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 6 May 2026.#Novis Insurance Company, Novis Versicherungsgesellschaft, Novis Compagnia di Assicurazioni, Novis Poisťovňa a.s. v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents exchanged in the course of an investigation procedure under Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 in respect of a breach of EU law – Refusal of access – Exception relating to protection of the purpose of investigations – Obligation to state reasons – General presumption of confidentiality – Obligation to undertake a specific and individual examination – Overriding public interest – Principle of proportionality – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-185/24. CELEX:62025TJ0480: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 May 2026.#Pharma Green Holding SpA SB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition Proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark alma FARMACIE – International registration of the earlier word mark ALMA HYBRID – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-480/25. Comments are only visible to subscribers.