Admin MPS / petek, 09. avgust 2024 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62020CJ0083_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 May 2022.#BPC Lux 2 Sàrl and Others v Banco de Portugal and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo.#Case C-83/20. CELEX:62020CJ0083: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Erste Kammer) vom 5. Mai 2022.#BPC Lux 2 Sàrl u.a. gegen Banco de Portugal u.a.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Richtlinie 2014/59/EU – Bankenunion – Sanierung und Abwicklung von Kreditinstituten und Wertpapierfirmen – Art. 36, 73 und 74 – Schutz von Anteilseignern und Gläubigern – Teilweise Umsetzung vor Ablauf der dafür vorgesehenen Frist – Schrittweise Umsetzung – Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union – Art. 17 Abs. 1 – Eigentumsrecht.#Rechtssache C-83/20. CELEX:62020CJ0086: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Erste Kammer) vom 28. April 2022.#Vinařství U Kapličky s.r.o. gegen Státní zemědělská a potravinářská inspekce.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Gemeinsame Marktorganisation für landwirtschaftliche Erzeugnisse – Wein – Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1308/2013 – Vorschriften für die Vermarktung – Art. 80 – Önologische Verfahren – Vermarktungsverbot – Art. 90 – Einfuhren von Wein – Verordnung (EG) Nr. 555/2008 – Art. 43 – Dokument V I 1 – Bescheinigung über die Herstellung von Weinpartien in empfohlenen oder zugelassenen önologischen Verfahren – Beweiswert – Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1306/2013 – Art. 89 Abs. 4 – Sanktionen – Vermarktung von Wein aus einem Drittland – Wein, der Gegenstand nicht zugelassener önologischer Verfahren war – Befreiung von der Ve Print 23 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62024CJ0373_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#NI v Republika Hrvatska.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Općinski sud u Puli-Pola.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2003/88/EC – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Article 1(3) – Article 2(1) – Concept of ‘working time’ – Activities of public prosecutors – Directive 89/391/EEC – Article 2(2) – Characteristics peculiar to certain specific public service activities – Periods of time on stand-by at the workplace and periods of time on stand-by according to a stand-by system carried out outside of the workplace – Article 31 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Fair and just working conditions.#Case C-373/24. CELEX:62024CJ0526: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 March 2026.#Brillen Rottler GmbH & Co. KG v TC.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 12(5) – Article 15(1) – Data subject’s right of access to the personal data concerning him or her – Controller’s right to refuse to act on the request for access – Excessive character of the request – Abuse of rights – First request for access – Right to compensation and liability – Article 82(1) – Action based on infringement of the right of access – Non-material damage – Loss of control over personal data.#Case C-526/24. CELEX:62024CJ0589: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 March 2026.#Almirall BV and Almirall SA v Infinity Pharma BV and Pharmaline BV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Scope – Article 2(1) – Medicinal products prepared industrially or manufactured by a method involving an industrial process – Article 3(2) – Medicinal products prepared in a pharmacy in accordance with the prescriptions of a pharmacopoeia and intended to be supplied directly to the patients served by the pharmacy in question – Exclusion from the directive’s scope – National regulation subjecting the latter medicinal products to an authorisation requirement on the basis of a numerical criterion.#Case C-589/24. CELEX:62023CJ0649: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 March 2026.#Institutul de Istorie şi Teorie Literară „G. Călinescu” and Fundaţia Naţională pentru Ştiinţă şi Artă v HK, en qualité d'héritier de TB and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 2001/29/EC – Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society – Reproduction right – Article 2(a) – Concept of a ‘work’ – Protection of works by copyright – Conditions – Directive 2006/116/EC – Article 5 – Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works – Article 2 – Critical edition of a pre-existing work the purpose of which is to restore a Latin manuscript – Intellectual creation reflecting the personality of its author, by expressing th CELEX:62024CJ0178: Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 19 mars 2026.#Mainova AG et enercity AG contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Concurrence – Règlement (CE) no 139/2004 – Concentration d’entreprises – Marchés allemands de l’électricité et du gaz – Acquisition par E.ON SE d’actifs de distribution et de commerce de RWE AG – Décision déclarant la concentration compatible avec le marché intérieur et le fonctionnement de l’accord sur l’Espace économique européen, du 2 mai 1992.#Affaires jointes C-178/24 P et C-179/24 P. CELEX:62024CJ0870_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 19 mars 2026.#Valsts ieņēmumu dienests contre SIA „OUTLETICO”.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Aides d’État – Règlement (UE) no 651/2014 – Catégories d’aides pouvant être considérées comme compatibles avec le marché intérieur – Exemption prévue pour les aides en faveur des petites et moyennes entreprises – Article 1er de l’annexe I – Notion d’“entreprise” – Article 3, paragraphe 3, de l’annexe I – Notion d’“entreprises liées” – Personne physique détenant une majorité des droits de vote associés aux actions d’une entreprise – Exercice d’une activité économique – Exercice effectif de contrôle par l’immixtion directe ou indirecte dans la gestion de l’entreprise.#Affaire C-870/24. CELEX:62025CO0564: Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 12 mars 2026.#FL contre Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération judiciaire en matière pénale (Eurojust) et Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération des services répressifs (Europol).#Pourvoi – Article 181 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Coopération des autorités de police et autres services répressifs des États membres – Article 340 TFUE – Règlement (UE) 2016/794 – Article 50, paragraphe 1 – Responsabilité non contractuelle de l’Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération des services répressifs (Europol) – Prétendu traitement illicite de données à caractère personnel transmises à Europol par des autorités nationales – Réalité du préjudice prétendument subi – Pourvoi en partie manifesteme CELEX:62024CJ0348_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#Compañía de Distribución Integral Logista, SA v Administración General del Estado.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Community Customs Code – Customs warehousing procedure – Release for free circulation – Article 29 – Value of goods for customs purposes – Goods sold for export to the customs territory of the European Union – Article 112(3) – Determination of the customs value – Article 214(1) – Relevant point in time for the purpose of determining the customs value – Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 – Article 97n(2) – Proof of origin of the goods – Article 118(1) and (3) – Period for submission of proofs of CELEX:62024CJ0870: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 March 2026.#Valsts ieņēmumu dienests v SIA „OUTLETICO”.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 – Categories of aid which may be considered to be compatible with the internal market – Exemption provided for aid to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) – Article 1 of Annex I – Concept of an ‘enterprise’ – Article 3(3) of Annex I – Concept of ‘linked enterprises’ – Natural person holding the majority of voting rights associated with the shares of an enterprise – Engaging in an economic activity – Actual control exercised through direct or indirect involvement in the management of the enterprise.#Case C-870/24. CELEX:62025CC0007: Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 19 March 2026.### CELEX:62024CC0808: Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 19 March 2026.### CELEX:62025CC0339: Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 19 March 2026.### CELEX:62024CJ0509_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 November 2025.#Investcapital Ltd v M.H.S.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción de Arucas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 6(1) – Article 7(1) – Contract concerning a bank account – Order for payment procedure – Review of the court’s own motion of whether contractual terms are unfair – Proposal by the court to reduce the claim by the amount corresponding to the application of a term considered to be unfair – Acceptance by the seller or supplier and possibility to claim that amount in subsequent proceedings – Principle of effectiveness – Participation of the consumer in the review of whether a contractual te CELEX:62023CJ0281_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#Polskie sieci elektroenergetyczne S.A. and Others v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Appeal – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Board of Appeal of the European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – Articles 20, 21 and 37 – Balancing electricity – Transmission system operators – Establishment of European platforms for the exchange of balancing energy – European platform for the exchange of balancing energy from frequency restoration reserves with manual activation (mFRR platform) – European platform for the exchange of balancing energy from frequency restoration reserves with automatic activation (aFR CELEX:62024CJ0770_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 19 mars 2026.#DB InfraGO AG et DB RegioNetz Infrastruktur GmbH contre Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Transports ferroviaires – Directive 2012/34/CE – Infrastructure ferroviaire – Indépendance de gestion – Article 4, paragraphe 2 – Indépendance des gestionnaires de l’infrastructure – Tarification de l’infrastructure et des services – Article 29, paragraphe 1 – Établissement et recouvrement des redevances – Système de tarification des redevances d’utilisation de l’infrastructure ferroviaire allemande – Transports ferroviaires de voyageurs à courte distance – Calcul du montant des redevances – Multiplication du montant des redevances moyennes perçues au cours d’une période de référence par un taux d’au CELEX:62023CJ0388_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 December 2024.#Golden Omega S.A. v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane, kantoor Rotterdam Rijnmond.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the rechtbank Noord-Holland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 – Common Customs Tariff – Tariff classification – Combined Nomenclature – Heading 1516 – Fats and oils and their fractions – Fish oil in the form of ethyl esters – Esterification of fatty acids with ethanol – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1661 – Validity.#Case C-388/23. CELEX:62024CJ0396_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#mBank S.A. and Others v BL and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Krakowie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 7(1) – Mortgage loan agreement indexed to a foreign currency, containing unfair terms – Effects of a finding that a term is unfair – Nullity of that agreement – Repayment by the consumer of the amount of the loan obtained under a void agreement irrespective of repayments made – Deterrent effect of the prohibition on unfair terms – Acceptance by the consumer of the claim for repayment – Obligation on the national court to make the judgment against the defendant immediately enforceable.# CELEX:62024CC0762: Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 19 March 2026.### CELEX:62024CC0530: Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 19 March 2026.### CELEX:62025CJ0043: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 March 2026.#SML Maschinengesellschaft mbH v AK en tant qu’administrateur dans la procédure de liquidation portant sur le patrimoine de MAPLAN Maschinenfabrik und Anlagen für Kunststofftechnik Schwerin GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 – Insolvency proceedings – Article 13 – Conflicts of laws – Loan granted by a shareholder of a capital company to that company – Action for restitution of payments received by the creditor before the opening of the insolvency proceedings – Action aimed at ensuring compliance with the ranking of claims in those proceedings.#Case C-43/25. Comments are only visible to subscribers.