Related articles

• CELEX:62026CO0278_INF: Order of the Court of 30 June 2026.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-278/26 P.
• CELEX:62025TO0844_INF: Order of the President of the General Court of 22 June 2026.#Biohaven Bioscience Ireland Ltd and Biohaven Therapeutics Ltd v European Medicines Agency.#Interim relief – Medicinal products for human use – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Withdrawal of the application for marketing authorisation for Dazluma – Publication of the assessment report – Application for suspension of operation – Prima facie case – Urgency – Weighing up of interests.#Case T-844/25 R.
• CELEX:62025TJ0030_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#HI v European Parliament.#Civil service – Officials – Reports procedure – 2022 appraisal procedure – Staff report – Impartiality – Duty of care – Protection of personal data – Article 43 of the Staff Regulations – Internal rules on staff reports – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-30/25.
• CELEX:62024TJ0084_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 April 2026.#UU v Court of Justice of the European Union.#Case T-84/24.
• CELEX:62025TO0505_INF:           Ordonnance du président du Tribunal du 12 mai 2026.#Ivan Sammut contre Commission européenne.#Référé – Marchés publics de services – Prestation de services de traduction – Demande de mesures provisoires – Méconnaissance des exigences de forme – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-505/25 R.
• CELEX:62024TO0247_INF: Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 May 2026.#Evroins inshurans grup AD v European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority.#Action for annulment – Economic and monetary policy – Request to initiate an investigation – Refusal by EIOPA – Decision of the Board of Appeal to dismiss the appeal as inadmissible – Manifest lack of jurisdiction in part – Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-247/24.
• CELEX:62024CJ0899_INF: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 April 2026.#HG v European Commission.#Case C-899/24 P.
• CELEX:62025TO0214_INF: Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 February 2026.#IR v Council of the European Union.#Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Downgrading in the same function group – Unauthorised engagement in outside activities – Article 10 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-214/25.
• CELEX:62023TJ0328_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 February 2026.#Radical-Consulting UG and Others v European High-Performance Computing Joint Undertaking.#Research and technological development – Horizon Europe Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027) – High-performance computing applications – Call for proposals with a view to the award of a grant – Decision rejecting a proposal – Decision rejecting the request for an evaluation review – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of transparency – Equal treatment – Article 30 of Regulation (EU) 2021/695.#Case T-328/23.
• CELEX:62025CO0642_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 March 2026.#Dragoș Ionuț Onescu v European Commission.#Case C-642/25 P.
• CELEX:62025CO0368_INF: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 24 February 2026.#A. A. v C.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije.#Case C-368/25.
• CELEX:62025CO0868_INF: Order of the Court of 30 April 2026.#European Lotto and Betting ltd. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Appeal failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-868/25 P.
• CELEX:62024TJ0669_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 March 2026.#Opticoelectron Group AD v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Case T-669/24.
• CELEX:62024CJ0789_INF:           Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#International Management Group (IMG) contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Responsabilité non contractuelle – Réglementation financière de l’Union – Exécution du budget de l’Union européenne en gestion indirecte par une organisation internationale – Décision refusant à une entité la reconnaissance du statut d’organisation internationale – Préjudice matériel – Perte de chance de conclure avec la Commission européenne des conventions de délégation selon le mode de la gestion indirecte en qualité d’organisation internationale et de percevoir une contribution visant à couvrir les frais administratifs induits – Lien de causalité – Réalité et étendue du préjudice.#Affaire C-789/24 P.
• CELEX:62021TJ0359_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#ClientEarth AISBL v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents concerning the active substances mancozeb and cypermethrin – Individual positions of the Member States in the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed – Partial refusal of access – Article 4(2) and (3) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process – Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings – Overriding public interest.#Case T-359/21.
• CELEX:62024TJ0465_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 February 2026.#FA v European Investment Bank.#Case T-465/24.
• CELEX:62025CJ0346_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#FIBO MARKETS Limited v J.P.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Conflicts of laws – Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 (Rome I) – Applicable law – Consumer contracts – Exceptions – Financial contracts for differences (CFDs) – Rights and obligations which constitute a financial instrument – Process of setting prices for CFDs – Difference between the exchange rate deviation accepted in the consumer’s order and the exchange rate deviation in the transaction executed.#Case C-346/25.
• CELEX:62026TO0310: Order of the President of the General Court of 12 August 2026.#TB v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Application for interim measures – Civil service – Member of the temporary staff – Fixed-term contract – Termination of the contract – Application for suspension of operation and interim measures – Lack of urgency.#Case T-310/26 R.
• CELEX:62026CO0067_INF:           Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#Napag Italia S.r.l. contre Agenzia delle Entrate – Direzione Regionale del Lazio.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Absence de mise en œuvre du droit de l’Union – Incompétence manifeste de la Cour.#Affaire C-67/26.
• CELEX:62025CO0564_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#FL v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation and European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Case C-564/25 P.