Admin MPS / sreda, 02. marec 2022 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62019CJ0680_INF: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 November 2021.#Fulmen v Council of the European Union.#Case C-680/19 P. CELEX:62019CJ0677_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 October 2020.#SC Valoris SRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Craiova – Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Vâlcea and Administraţia Fondului pentru Mediu.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Principles of EU law – Principle of sincere cooperation – Principles of equivalence and effectiveness – Recovery of taxes levied by a Member State in breach of EU law – Time limit for lodging applications for reimbursement of such taxes – No similar time limit for the reimbursement of sums levied by that Member State in breach of national law.#Case C-677/19. CELEX:62019CJ0681_INF: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 November 2021.#Fereydoun Mahmoudian v Council of the European Union.#Case C-681/19 P. Print 204 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62024TJ0573_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#Romagnoli Fratelli SpA v Community Plant Variety Office.#Plant varieties – Grant of a Community plant variety right for the potato variety Melrose – Failure to pay the annual fee on time – Cancellation of right – Application for restitutio in integrum – Competence of the Board of Appeal – Concept of ‘particular circumstances’ – Conditions for notification of decisions and communications of the CPVO.#Case T-573/24. CELEX:62026CN0094: Case C-94/26, WineCorps: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 16 February 2026 – WineCorps Zrt. v Nemzeti Élelmiszerlánc-biztonsági Hivatal CELEX:62026TN0173: Case T-173/26: Action brought on 12 March 2026 – Blach-Pol Krzysztofik, Pałyga v EUIPO – Szymczuk (Roof coverings) CELEX:62025TB0845: Case T-845/25, Ryanair DAC: Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber sitting with five judges) of 23 February 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln – Germany) – ZB, JG, YZ, TA and BX v Ryanair DAC) CELEX:62026CN0008: Case C-8/26, Bager: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bezirksgericht Feldkirch (Austria) lodged on 12 January 2026 – RN v V AG CELEX:62025TA0006: Case T-6/25: Judgment of the General Court of 11 March 2026 – QI v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Psychological harassment – Article 12(a) of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Refusal of request – Substantial new facts that may justify the submission of a request for reconsideration of a previous decision – Prima facie evidence of the alleged psychological harassment – Liability) CELEX:62026CN0047: Case C-47/26 P: Appeal brought on 30 January 2026 by European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, sitting with five Judges) delivered on 19 November 2025 in Case T-367/23, Amazon EU v Commission CELEX:62026CN0028: Case C-28/26, Volkswagen: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Steyr (Austria) lodged on 23 January 2026 – Mayrhofer KG v Volkswagen AG CELEX:62025CN0564: Case C-564/25 P: Appeal brought on 21 August 2025 by FL against the order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2025 in Case T-506/24, FL v Eurojust and Europol CELEX:62024TB0487: Case T-487/24: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 February 2026 – RWE Supply & Trading v ACER CELEX:62024TA0145: Case T-145/24: Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2026 – CU v EEAS (Civil service – Officials – Psychological harassment – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Investigation – Refusal of the request – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Principle of good administration – Impartiality – Right to be heard – Error of assessment – Reasonable time limit – Duty to provide assistance – Liability – Non-material damage) CELEX:62026TN0180: Case T-180/26: Action brought on 16 March 2026 – ClientEarth v Commission CELEX:62024TB0267: Case T-267/24: Order of the General Court of 26 February 2026 – Edge v EIB (Action for annulment – Civil service – EIB staff – Period within which proceedings must be commenced – Article 41a of the Staff Regulations of the EIB – Calculation of time limits – Not admissible) CELEX:62025TA0108: Case T-108/25: Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2026 – MAN Truck & Bus v EUIPO – Rolls-Royce Power Systems (V12X) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark V12X – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Validity of evidence – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Right to property – Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights) CELEX:62025TA0303: Case T-303/25: Judgment of the General Court of 11 March 2026 – SBG v EUIPO – VF International (GEOGRAPHICAL NORWAY EXPEDITION) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark GEOGRAPHICAL NORWAY EXPEDITION – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) CELEX:62025TA0114: Case T-114/25: Judgment of the General Court of 11 March 2026 – MAX magazín v EUIPO – RCS Mediagroup (MAX) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark MAX – Genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) CELEX:62025CN0565: Case C-565/25 P: Appeal brought on 21 August 2025 by CW against the order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2025 in Case T-148/24, CW v Europol and Eurojust CELEX:62026CN0082: Case C-82/26, Tofana: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 11 February 2026 – Tofana Srl v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni CELEX:62025TA0077: Case T-77/25: Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2026 – Debonair v EUIPO – Loewe (AOURA) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark AOURA – Earlier EU word mark AURA LOEWE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001) CELEX:62022CA0382: Case C-382/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – Cathay Pacific Airways v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Defence alleging State constraint – Decision of the General Court of the European Union not to rule on certain pleas – Proof of participation in a single and continuous infringeme Comments are only visible to subscribers.