Admin MPS / petek, 22. avgust 2025 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62016TJ0157: Judgment of the General Court (Appeal Chamber) of 17 November 2016.#Ingrid Fedtke v European Economic and Social Committee.#Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Purely confirmatory act — New substantive facts — Burden of proof.#Case T-157/16 P. CELEX:62016TJ0131_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 February 2019.#Kingdom of Belgium and Magnetrol International v European Commission.#State aid — Aid scheme implemented by Belgium — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering recovery of the aid granted — Tax ruling — Excess profit exemption — Fiscal autonomy of the Member States — Concept of an aid scheme — Further implementing measures.#Cases T-131/16 and T-263/16. CELEX:62016TJ0177_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 5 February 2019.#Mema GmbH LG v Community Plant Variety Office.#Plant varieties — Application for a Community plant variety right for the plant variety Braeburn 78 (11078) — Designation of another examination office — Scope of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-177/16. Print 17 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62024CO0821_INF: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 November 2025.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Case C-821/24. CELEX:62024CJ0059_INF: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#Kingdom of the Netherlands v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – State measure extending gambling licences granted by the Kingdom of the Netherlands – Decision of the European Commission not to raise objections – Rejection of a complaint – No examination of the existence of a potential indirect advantage – Scope of the Commission’s duty to carry out an examination – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-59/24 P. CELEX:62025TO0005(01): Ordonnance du Tribunal (troisième chambre) du 9 mars 2026.#HD e.a. contre Parlement européen et Service européen pour l'action extérieure.#Responsabilité non contractuelle – Fonctionnaire affecté à la délégation de l’Union dans un État tiers – Violences domestiques – Immunité diplomatique – Fondement juridique du recours – Article 270 TFUE – Non-respect de la procédure précontentieuse – Articles 90 et 91 du statut – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire T-5/25. CELEX:62024CO0566: Ordonnance de la Cour (septième chambre) du 5 mars 2026.#Consumer Rights Recovery sp. z o.o. contre Santander Bank Polska S.A.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 100, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Litige au principal devenu sans objet – Non-lieu à statuer.#Affaire C-566/24. CELEX:32013R1308R(30) CELEX:32026D0575: Council Decision (EU) 2026/575 of 5 March 2026 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the 69th session of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs on the scheduling of substances under the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961, as amended by the 1972 Protocol, and the Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971 CELEX:32013R1379R(05) CELEX:32026R0471R(01) CELEX:32014R0596R(14) CELEX:32013R0575R(10): Rectificatif au règlement (UE) n° 575/2013 du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 26 juin 2013 concernant les exigences prudentielles applicables aux établissements de crédit et modifiant le règlement (UE) n° 648/2012 (JO L 176 du 27.6.2013) CELEX:32019L0879R(09) CELEX:62024CJ0043: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#K. M. H. v Obshtina Stara Zagora.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Article 21(1) TFEU – Right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Impediments – Request to amend gender data in the civil status registers – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 4(3) – Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for private and family life – Obligation, for a court of a Member State, to comply with the case-law of the constitutional court of that State – Interpretation in conformity with EU law.#Case C-43/24. CELEX:62024CJ0597: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#C.M. v Ministero dell’Istruzione e del Merito.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Prohibition of discrimination on the ground of disability – Article 2(2) – Right of a teacher with a disability to be transferred to a particular territorial area – Article 5 – Reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities – Priority for mobility within a territorial area as compared to mobility between different territorial areas.#Case C-597/24. CELEX:62024CJ0863: Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 12 mars 2026.#Federazione Italiana delle Banche di Credito Cooperativo e Casse Rurali (Federcasse) e.a. contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Politique économique et monétaire – Activités des établissements de crédit – Systèmes de garantie des dépôts (SGD) – Directive 2014/49/UE – Article 10, paragraphe 6 – Réduction du niveau cible des contributions à un SGD – Conditions – Demande d’autorisation de réduction du niveau cible d’un SGD – Lettre de la commissaire européenne chargée des services financiers, de la stabilité financière et de l’union des marchés de capitaux indiquant que les conditions ne sont pas réunies – Notion d’“acte attaquable” – Recours en annulation.#Affaire C-863/24 P. CELEX:62025CC0011: Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 12 March 2026.### CELEX:62024CJ0084: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#UAB „EM SYSTEM“ v AB SEB bankas and AS „Citadele banka“ Lietuvos filialas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus – Article 2(1) – Annex I – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures – Inclusion of the name of the shareholder of a company on that list – 50% stake in the capital of that company held by that shareholder – Freezing of the funds of the company, which is not included on the list – Control by a person or entity included on the list of a legal person not included on the list – Criteria for assessment – Right to effective judicial protection – Rights of the def CELEX:62024CJ0043_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 12 mars 2026.#K. M. H. contre Obshtina Stara Zagora.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Citoyenneté de l’Union – Article 21, paragraphe 1, TFUE – Droit de circuler et de séjourner librement sur le territoire des États membres – Obstacles – Demande de modification des données relatives au genre dans les registres d’état civil – Directive 2004/38/CE – Article 4, paragraphe 3 – Article 7 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Droit au respect de la vie privée et familiale – Obligation, pour une juridiction d’un État membre, de se conformer à la jurisprudence de la cour constitutionnelle de cet État – Interprétation conforme.#Affaire C-43/24. CELEX:62024CC0482: Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 12 March 2026.### CELEX:62025CO0561: Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 5 mars 2026.#BF contre ZAD « Allianz Bulgaria Zhivot ».#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Exigence de présentation du contexte réglementaire du litige au principal et des raisons justifiant la nécessité d’une réponse à la question préjudicielle – Absence de précisions suffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-561/25. CELEX:62024CJ0527: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#Harry et Associés Sarl v Agenzia delle entrate – Riscossione – Pescara and Agenzia delle entrate – Centro operativo di Pescara.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Refund of VAT – Directive 2008/9/EC – Articles 2, 15 and 23 – Principles of VAT neutrality, effectiveness and proportionality – Taxable person established in a Member State other than the Member State of VAT refund – Application for VAT refund – Technical fault in the electronic transmission of the application – Failure to act on the part of the tax authorities of the Member State of refund to which the application was made – Final judicial decision – Res judicata.#Case C-527/24. Comments are only visible to subscribers.