Admin MPS / torek, 14. julij 2026 / Categories: Aktualno EU zakonodaja - CELEX CELEX:32026D1711: Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1711 of 13 July 2026 launching the European Union Partnership Mission in Armenia (EUPM Armenia) and amending Decision (CFSP) 2026/894 CELEX:32026D1709: Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1709 of 13 July 2026 amending Decision (CFSP) 2024/1484 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Russia CELEX:32026D1713: Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1713 of 13 July 2026 amending Decision (CFSP) 2019/797 concerning restrictive measures against cyber-attacks threatening the Union or its Member States Print 0 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62025TJ0042_INF: Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 1er juillet 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne enregistré représentant un abat-jour – Motif de nullité – Non-respect des conditions de protection ‑ Article 25, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (CE) no 6/2002 – Absence de caractère individuel – Article 6 du règlement no 6/2002 – Examen d’office des faits – Article 63, paragraphe 1, du règlement no 6/2002.#Affaire T-42/25. CELEX:62025TO0671_INF: Ordonnance du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 11 mai 2026.#TNG Stadtnetz GmbH contre Commission européenne.#Recours en annulation – Aides d’État – Fonds publics pour le développement de réseaux à haut débit – Plainte – Examen préliminaire d’une prétendue aide d’État illégale – Lettre d’information – Article 24, paragraphe 2, du règlement (UE) 2015/1589 – Acte préparatoire – Acte non susceptible de recours – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-671/25. CELEX:62025TJ0267_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 June 2026.#Osculati Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark O – Earlier EU figurative mark O – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Facts or evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-267/25. CELEX:62025TO0732_INF: Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 May 2026.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark SLIP-INS – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-732/25. CELEX:62025TJ0412_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 June 2026.#Parkster AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark PARKNER – Earlier EU word mark PARKSTER – Earlier national figurative mark Parkster – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-412/25. CELEX:62024TJ0433_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 February 2026.#Edward William Batchelor v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 – Documents relating to designation as a gatekeeper – Refusal of access – Obligation to state reasons – Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – Overriding public interest – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-433/24. CELEX:62024TO0313(01)_INF: Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 January 2026.#XH v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2023 promotion exercise – Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 8 – Article 45(1) of the Staff Regulations – No act open to challenge – Liability – Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-313/24. CELEX:62025TO0784(02)_INF: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#Tiemo Wölken v European Commission.#Case T-784/25. CELEX:62025TJ0350_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 July 2026.#Aguirre y Compañía, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark BLUE PADEL – Earlier EU figurative marks BULLPADEL – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Interdependence between factors – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-350/25. CELEX:62025TO0839_INF: Ordonnance du Tribunal (sixième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#Team Beverage AG contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Marque de l’Union européenne verbale TEAM – Cause de nullité absolue – Procédure devant la division d’annulation – Recours manifestement dépourvu de tout fondement en droit.#Affaire T-839/25. CELEX:62025TJ0309_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 July 2026.#SCM Biogroup v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark BIO-GROUP MEDICAL SYSTEM – Earlier EU figurative mark BIOGROUP – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-309/25. CELEX:62024TJ0365_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 January 2026.#LU v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Psychological harassment – Administrative inquiry – Request for assistance – Rejection of the request – Decision to initiate disciplinary proceedings – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Preparatory act – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Liability.#Case T-365/24. CELEX:62025TO0733_INF: Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 May 2026.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark TOTALLY HANDS FREE – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-733/25. CELEX:32026D1885: Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1885 of 30 July 2026 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran CELEX:32026D1713R(01): Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1713 of 13 July 2026 amending Decision (CFSP) 2019/797 concerning restrictive measures against cyber-attacks threatening the Union or its Member States (OJ L, 2026/1713, 13.7.2026) CELEX:32026D0455R(01) CELEX:32026D1882: Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1882 of 30 July 2026 reviewing the list of persons, groups and entities covered by Decision (CFSP) 2026/455 on restrictive measures to combat terrorism CELEX:32026R1714R(01): Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1714 of 13 July 2026 implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/796 concerning restrictive measures against cyber-attacks threatening the Union or its Member States (OJ L, 2026/1714, 13.7.2026) CELEX:32026D1879: Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2026/1879 of 24 July 2026 on the participation of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in the assistance to support Ukraine’s defence industrial capacities pursuant to Article 13(11) of Regulation (EU) 2026/467 CELEX:32026R1878: Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1878 of 30 July 2026 implementing Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism Comments are only visible to subscribers.