Related articles

• CELEX:62023CO0141(05)_INF: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#Telefónica de España, SA v European Commission.#Taxation of costs.#Case C-141/23 P (R) - DEP.
• CELEX:62024CJ0379_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 January 2026.#Agrupació de Neteja Sanitària, AIE and Educat Serveis Auxiliars SCCL v Tribunal Económico-Administrativo Regional de Cataluña (TEARC).#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña.#References for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Supply of services by independent groups of persons, who are carrying on an activity which is exempt from VAT – Services directly necessary for the exercise of the exempt activity – Risk of distortion of competition – Cleaning services in the healthcare and education sectors – National legislation requiring that the services be directly and exclusively linked to the exempt activit
• CELEX:62023CJ0482_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#European Commission v Kingdom of Denmark.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Access to the international market for coach and bus services – Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 – Article 2(4) and (7) and Article 15(b) – Cabotage operations by coach and bus in the context of occasional services – National measures of application introducing a maximum period of seven consecutive days in one calendar month – Margin of discretion – Proportionality.#Case C-482/23.
• CELEX:62023CJ0796_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 December 2025.#Česká síť s. r. o. v Odvolací finanční ředitelství.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 9(1) – Concept of ‘taxable person’ – Partners in a civil law partnership devoid of legal personality – Article 193 – Determination of the taxable person liable to pay VAT.#Case C-796/23.
• CELEX:62024CJ0680_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#WizzAir Hungary Légiközlekedési Kft. v Prezes Urzędu Lotnictwa Cywilnego.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Airport charges – Directive 2009/12/EC – Point 3 of Article 2 – Concept of ‘airport user’ – Article 6(2) – Obligation on the airport managing body to consult with airport users regarding changes to the system or the level of airport charges – Point (a) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(5) – Mandatory procedure for determining or approving airport charges or their maximum level by the independent supervisory authority – Second subparagraph of Article 6(5) – Article 11(1) and (7) – Obligation on
• CELEX:32026D0927: Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/927 of 27 April 2026 amending Decision 2013/184/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Myanmar/Burma
• CELEX:32026D00866R(01):           Rectificatif à la décision n° 2/2026 de la Secrétaire générale du Conseil de l’Union Européenne du 30 janvier 2026 établissant des modalités d’exécution concernant l’application du règlement (UE) 2018/1725 du Parlement européen et du Conseil et la limitation des droits des personnes concernées aux fins des mesures restrictives (JO C, C/2026/866, 9.2.2026)
• CELEX:32025R0932R(03)
• CELEX:32026D02450: Council Decision of 21 April 2026 replacing a member of the Management Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for Lithuania
• CELEX:32026D02451: Council Decision of 21 April 2026 replacing an alternate member of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for the Netherlands
• CELEX:32026R0926: Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/926 of 27 April 2026 implementing Regulation (EU) No 401/2013 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Myanmar/Burma
• CELEX:32026D02454: Council Decision of 21 April 2026 replacing a full member of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for Lithuania
• CELEX:32025L2206R(01)
• CELEX:32026D0928: Council Decision (EU) 2026/928 of 21 April 2026 appointing three members and two alternate members, proposed by the Italian Republic, of the Committee of the Regions
• CELEX:32018R1725R(03)
• CELEX:62025CO0624:           Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 20 avril 2026.#Miguel Ángel Navarro Riofrío contre Royaume d'Espagne.#Pourvoi – Article 181 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Recours en responsabilité non contractuelle dirigé contre un État membre – Incompétence manifeste des juridictions de l’Union européenne – Recours en manquement d’un État membre introduit par un particulier – Pourvoi manifestement non fondé.#Affaire C-624/25 P.
• CELEX:62026CN0021: Case C-21/26, Nazin: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Szegedi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 21 January 2026 – OL v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság
• CELEX:62024TA0691: Case T-691/24, Heineken România: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 4 March 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie – Romania) – Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili v Heineken România S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Common Customs Tariff – Combined Nomenclature – Tariff classification – Heading 2206 – Subheadings 22060031, 22060051, 22060081 and 22060039, 22060059 – Beverages composed of fermented apple juice, in which the proportion of alcohol derived from plants other than apples is, depending on the type of beverage, equal at least to 48 %, 50 %, 51 %, 52 % or 53 % in comparison with
• CELEX:62026CN0045: Case C-45/26, Towarzystwo Ubezpieczen: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven kasatsionen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 30 January 2026 – G. S. S., S. S. S., E. D. S., Z. S. R. v UNIQA Towarzystwo Ubezpieczen SA
• CELEX:62025TB0260: Case T-260/25: Order of the General Court of 9 February 2026 – Leidos and Others v Commission (Action for annulment – Approximation of laws – Harmonised radio spectrum – No locus standi – Lack of direct concern – Act not open to challenge – Preparatory act – Inadmissibility – Application for an order – Lack of jurisdiction)