Related articles

• CELEX:62024CA0418: Case C-418/24, Obadal: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo – Spain) – TJ v Comunidad de Madrid (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector – Clause 5 – Measures to prevent and penalise the abuse of successive fixed-term employment contracts or relationships – Conversion of successive fixed-term contracts into a contract of indefinite duration – National legislation not permitting such conversion, but laying down other measures to prevent and penalise such abuse – Effective, dissuasive and proportionate penalty measures)
• CELEX:62024CA0753: Case C-753/24, Rzepacz: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie – Poland) – Powszechna Kasa Oszczędności Bank Polski S.A. v MS and MS (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 7(1) – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Effects of a term being found to be unfair – Invalidity of the loan agreement – Actions for restitution – Limitation period for the action brought by the seller or supplier – Circumstances that may justify disregarding the expiry of the limitation period – Principle of effectiveness – Principle of legal certainty – Principle of proportionality – Right of access to a court – Unjust enrichment)
• CELEX:62025TA0291: Case T-291/25: Judgment of the General Court of 6 May 2026 – Ecuphar v EUIPO – Société des produits Nestlé (proGlan) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark proGlan – International registration of the earlier word mark PRO PLAN – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
• CELEX:62026CN0196: Case C-196/26, Dreame International: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court made on 11 March 2026 – Dyson Technology Limited v Dreame International (Hongkong) Limited, Eurep GmbH
• CELEX:62024CA0496: Case C-496/24, Stichting de Thuiskopie: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden – Netherlands) – Stichting Onderhandelingen Thuiskopievergoeding, Stichting de Thuiskopie v HP Nederland BV, Dell BV, Stichting Overlegorgaan Blanco Informatiedragers (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Intellectual property – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 2 – Reproduction right – Article 3(1) – Right of communication to the public of works – Art. 5(2)(b) – Private copying exception – Fair compensation – Paid streaming service – Offline streaming copy – Article 5(5))
• CELEX:62023CA0549: Case C-549/23, American Express Europe and Others: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven – Netherlands) – American Express Europe SA, American Express Carte France SA, Visa Europe Ltd, Mastercard Europe SA, Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV v Autoriteit Consument en Markt (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Payment services in the internal market – Regulation (EU) 2015/751 – Article 2(10) – Interchange fees for card-based payment transactions – Article 2(11) – Net compensation – Article 4 – Cap on the amount of those fees – Article 5 – Prohibition of circumvention – Remuneration received by a co-branding partner from a three party payment card scheme – Applicatio
• CELEX:62024TA0229: Case T-229/24: Judgment of the General Court of 29 April 2026 – Sánchez v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of competition – Open competition EPSO/AD/391/21 – Decision not to place the applicant’s name on the reserve list – Equal treatment – Normalisation of marks – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Principle of good administration – Duration of the administrative procedure – Reasonable period of time)
• CELEX:62025CB0883: Case C-883/25, Galindo Giralt v Spain: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 May 2026 – María del Pilar Galindo Giralt v Kingdom of Spain (Action brought by a natural person against a Member State – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)
• CELEX:62024CA0519: Case C-519/24, Nitrogénművek: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Veszprémi Törvényszék – Hungary) – Nitrogénművek Vegyipari Zrt. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Air pollution – System for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading – Directive 2003/87/EC – Transitional rules for harmonised free allocation – Article 10a – National legislation imposing a tax on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions on operators receiving a significant quantity of allowances allocated free of charge)
• CELEX:62026TN0277: Case T-277/26: Action brought on 5 May 2026 – LG Chem and LG Chem Europe v Commission
• CELEX:62026TN0253: Case T-253/26, Kohlenwasserstoff-Beförderung: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) made on 18 March 2026 – Hauptzollamt A v Kohlenwasserstoff-Beförderung
• CELEX:62025TB0618: Case T-618/25: Order of the General Court of 28 April 2026 – Les Patriotes v Commission (Action for annulment – Access to documents – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Out of time – Act not open to challenge – Partial inadmissibility – Application for an order – Partial lack of jurisdiction)
• CELEX:62025TA0202: Case T-202/25: Judgment of the General Court of 6 May 2026 – IP v EIB (Civil service – EIB staff – Reports procedure – Appraisal report – 2023 appraisal exercise – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Manifest error of assessment)
• CELEX:62026CN0161: Case C-161/26, Wimetz: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof (Belgium) lodged on 3 March 2026 – OS, PR, EE, IR v Ministerraad
• CELEX:62026TN0283: Case T-283/26: Action brought on 7 May 2026 – SG v Parliament
• CELEX:62025TB0546: Case T-546/25: Order of the General Court of 29 April 2026 – Makhlouf v Council
• CELEX:62025TB0364: Case T-364/25: Order of the General Court of 7 May 2026 – Luminus v Commission (Public procurement – Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/477 on the applicability of Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU to the award of contracts for the activities related to the generation and wholesale of electricity in Belgium – Corrigendum decision – Action which has become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate)
• CELEX:62025TB0621: Case T-621/25: Order of the General Court of 5 May 2026 – De Capitani v Commission (Access to documents – Implied refusal of access – Express decision adopted after the action was brought – Application to intervene – No need to adjudicate)
• CELEX:62026TN0248: Case T-248/26: Action brought on 21 April 2026 – SA v Commission
• CELEX:62024CA0899: Case C-899/24 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 April 2026 – HG v Commission (Appeal – Civil service – Officials – Compensation for damage suffered by the European Union – Recovery of debts by offsetting – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Second subparagraph of Article 98(2) – Limitation period – Concept of normal circumstances)