Admin MPS / torek, 30. april 2024 / Categories: Aktualno EU zakonodaja - CELEX CELEX:32024D1247: Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/1247 of 29 April 2024 amending Decision (CFSP) 2017/1869 on the European Union Advisory Mission in support of Security Sector Reform in Iraq (EUAM Iraq) CELEX:32024D1246: Decision (EU) 2024/1246 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 April 2024 on the subscription by the European Union to additional shares in the capital of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) and amending the Agreement establishing the EBRD as regards the extension of the geographic scope of EBRD operations to sub-Saharan Africa and Iraq, and the removal of the statutory capital limitation on ordinary operations CELEX:32024D1248: Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/1248 of 29 April 2024 on an assistance measure under the European Peace Facility to support the Armed Forces of Côte d’Ivoire Print 26 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62025TJ0073_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 February 2026.#Viva Credit IFN SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark Viva – Partial revocation – Genuine use of the mark – Proof of genuine use – Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-73/25. CELEX:62025TJ0114: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 March 2026.#MAX magazín s. r. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark MAX – Genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-114/25. CELEX:62025TJ0007: Arrêt du Tribunal (troisième chambre) du 11 mars 2026.#Daniel Puppan contre Parlement européen.#Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Notation – Exercice de notation 2023 – Rapport de notation – Recours en annulation – Délai de recours – Irrecevabilité – Promotion – Exercice de promotion 2023 – Attribution de points de mérite – Obligation de motivation – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Responsabilité.#Affaire T-7/25. CELEX:62021TJ0127_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 4 February 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Commission.#Energy – European platforms for the exchange of standard products for balancing energy – Switzerland’s participation – Article 1(6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – Letter from the Commission refusing to authorise the Swiss transmission system operator to participate in the platforms – Action for annulment – Challengeable act – Continuing interest in bringing proceedings – Locus standi – Admissibility – Lack of competence of the author of the act.#Case T-127/21 RENV. CELEX:62025TJ0062: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 March 2026.#Shenzen Smoore Technology Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark V VENILO – Earlier EU figurative mark V – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Earlier mark’s lack of enhanced distinctiveness acquired through use – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-62/25. CELEX:62024TJ0663: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 March 2026.#Mostostal S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark MOSTOSTAL – No genuine use of the trade mark – No proper reasons for non-use – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.#Case T-663/24. CELEX:62025TJ0055: Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 11 mars 2026.#Weight Doctors GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne verbale Endo-Sleeve – Motif absolu de refus – Caractère descriptif – Absence de caractère distinctif – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous b) et c), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001.#Affaire T-55/25. CELEX:62025TJ0006: Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 11 mars 2026.#QI contre Commission européenne.#Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Harcèlement moral – Article 12 bis du statut – Demande d’assistance – Article 24 du statut – Rejet de la demande – Faits nouveaux et substantiels pouvant justifier la présentation d’une demande tendant au réexamen d’une décision antérieure – Commencement de preuve du harcèlement moral allégué – Responsabilité.#Affaire T-6/25. CELEX:62025TJ0301: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 March 2026.#Dariusz Kowalski v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark FLAMBIT – Earlier national word mark flambriks – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-301/25. CELEX:62025TJ0195: Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 11 mars 2026.#Friedrich Erlbacher contre Commission européenne.#Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Avis de vacance – Poste de directeur – Rejet de candidature – Acte faisant grief – Recevabilité – Incompétence de l’auteur de l’acte – Critères d’éligibilité – Notion de “fonction d’encadrement intermédiaire” – Erreur de droit.#Affaire T-195/25. CELEX:62024TO0681_INF: Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 August 2025.#Asociación de investigación para la industria del calzado y conexas (Inescop) v European Commission.#Case T-681/24. CELEX:62025TJ0303: Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 11 mars 2026.#Super Brand Licencing (SBG) contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Marque de l’Union européenne figurative GEOGRAPHICAL NORWAY EXPEDITION – Cause de nullité absolue – Mauvaise foi – Article 52, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (CE) no 207/2009.#Affaire T-303/25. CELEX:62025TJ0326: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 March 2026.#Kiss Nail Products, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark IMPRESS – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Legal certainty – Equal treatment – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-326/25. CELEX:32026D0554: Council Decision (EU) 2026/554 of 5 March 2026 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Bosnia and Herzegovina on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in Bosnia and Herzegovina CELEX:32019R0881R(07) CELEX:62025CO0220_INF: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 December 2025.#ER v Miskolci Törvényszék.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Pécsi Törvényszék.#Case C-220/25. CELEX:62025CO0403_INF: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 December 2025.#J.L.Q. v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) and Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social de Elche.#Case C-403/25. CELEX:62024TO0458_INF: Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 20 August 2025.#Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA) and Bernard O'Connor v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Implied refusal of access – Express decision adopted after the action was brought – No need to adjudicate – Modification of the form of order sought – Article 86(2) of the Rules of Procedure – Failure to observe the time limit for instituting proceedings – No separate document – Manifest inadmissibility – Application for a direction to be issued – Manifest lack of jurisdiction.#Case T-458/24. CELEX:62023CJ0101_INF: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#PNB Banka AS v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Procedural rights – Effective judicial protection – Inadmissibility.#Case C-101/23 P. CELEX:62023CJ0102_INF: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#PNB Banka AS v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Procedural rights – Statement of reasons.#Case C-102/23 P. Comments are only visible to subscribers.