Admin MPS / torek, 20. februar 2024 / Categories: Aktualno EU zakonodaja - CELEX CELEX:32024D0656: Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/656 of 19 February 2024 on Union support for the activities of the International Atomic Energy Agency in the area of nuclear security CELEX:32024D0649: Council Decision (EU) 2024/649 of 15 November 2023 on the position to be taken on behalf of the Union at the 10th session of the Conference of the Parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control CELEX:32024D06721: Council Decision of 5 November 2024 replacing a member of the Advisory Committee for the Coordination of Social Security Systems for Sweden Print 30 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62024CJ0484: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#NTH Haustechnik GmbH v EM.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5(1)(e) – Storage limitation – Point (e) of the first subparagraph of Article 6 – Lawfulness of processing such data relating to a contract of employment in judicial proceedings – Article 17(3)(e) – No obligation to erase such data where processing is necessary for the establishment, exercise or defence of legal claims – Data collected by the employer with a view to proving a serious failure by the employee to comply with his or her obligations – Use of evidence obtained unlawfully.#Case C-484/24. CELEX:62025CC0550: Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 18 June 2026.### CELEX:62025TO0654_INF: Order of the President of the General Court of 26 March 2026.#Stanislav Dobrinov Stoyanov v Council of the European Union.#Case T-654/25 R. CELEX:62024TJ0545_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#Implementing Technologies, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-545/24. CELEX:62024CJ0575: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#Vodovody a kanalizace Přerov, a.s. v Úřad pro ochranu osobních údajů.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Open data and the re-use of public sector information – Directive (EU) 2019/1024 – Article 2(3) – Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice – Concept of ‘public undertaking’ – Undertaking owned by several public sector bodies – Presumption of ‘dominant influence’ – Criteria for assessment.#Case C-575/24. CELEX:62024CJ0658: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#Penny Market Kft. v Komárom-Esztergom Vármegyei Kormányhivatal.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Common organisation of the markets in agricultural products – Services in the internal market – National legislation imposing an obligation, for a specified period, on retailers of foodstuffs with a turnover in excess of a certain amount, to reduce the prices of certain foodstuffs and to have minimum quantities of those foodstuffs in stock – Measure taken as a result of a situation of emergency – Fines.#Case C-658/24. CELEX:62024CJ0880: Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 18 juin 2026.#VK contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Agent temporaire – Statut des fonctionnaires de l’Union européenne – Article 77 – Article 11, paragraphe 2, de l’annexe VIII – Article 5, paragraphe 1, sixième alinéa, des dispositions générales d’exécution des articles 11 et 12 de l’annexe VIII du statut relatifs au transfert de droits à pension – Pension d’ancienneté – Droits à pension acquis avant l’entrée au service de l’Union européenne – Délai dans lequel une demande de transfert vers le régime de pensions des institutions de l’Union doit être présentée – Rejet de la demande de transfert présentée hors délai – Circonstances exceptionnelles – Pandémie de COVID‑19.#Affaire C-880/24 P. CELEX:62025CC0395: Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 18 June 2026.### CELEX:62024CJ0522: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#BG v Ministero della Difesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Article 1 – Purpose – Article 2(2)(a) and (b) – Prohibition of discrimination on the ground of belief – National legislation requiring military personnel to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 – Difference in treatment based on membership of a particular professional category – Concept of ‘belief’.#Case C-522/24. CELEX:62025TJ0471_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark NAVIGATE – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-471/25. CELEX:62025TJ0106_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 March 2026.#Pols Erm Tarim Anonim Sirketi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Pol’s FREEZE FRESH – Earlier EU figurative marks PAUL depuis 1889 and PAUL LE CAFE – Relative ground for refusal – Detriment to the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Link between the marks at issue.#Case T-106/25. CELEX:62025CC0185: Opinion of Advocate General Norkus delivered on 18 June 2026.### CELEX:62024CC0138: Conclusions de l'avocate générale Mme J. Kokott, présentées le 18 juin 2026.### CELEX:62025CC0241: Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 18 June 2026.### CELEX:62025CJ0232: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#Z.R. and Ś. v U. and Z.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 – Jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Article 5(3) – Special jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict – Place where the harmful event occurred or may occur – Natural and legal persons claiming breach of their personality rights as a result of the broadcast of audiovisual content on television and on the internet – International jurisdiction of the courts of a Member State other than the Member State where that content was produced – Place where the damage occurred – Centre of interests of those persons – Content CELEX:62024CJ0376: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#MT v Comité de direction de l’Autorité des Services et des Marchés Financiers (FSMA).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2003/6/EC – Article 3 – Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 – Article 10 – Unlawful disclosure of inside information – Insider dealing and market abuse – Financial services – Article 21 – Disclosure or dissemination of information in the media – Disclosure of inside information in the media by a politician – Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed at Rome on 4 November 1950 – Article 10 – Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Freedom of expression – Article 52(1) and (3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Interpretation and limitation on t CELEX:62025TO0653_INF: Order of the President of the General Court of 26 March 2026.#MS and Others v Council of the European Union.#Case T-653/25 R. CELEX:62024TJ0183_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#DP and DQ v European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority.#Action for damages – Non-contractual liability of the European Union – Origin of the dispute – Limitation period – Admissibility – Article 339 TFEU – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of good administration – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-183/24. CELEX:62024CC0582: Opinion of Advocate General Norkus delivered on 18 June 2026.### CELEX:62024CJ0522_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#BG v Ministero della Difesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Article 1 – Purpose – Article 2(2)(a) and (b) – Prohibition of discrimination on the ground of belief – National legislation requiring military personnel to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 – Difference in treatment based on membership of a particular professional category – Concept of ‘belief’.#Case C-522/24. Comments are only visible to subscribers.