Related articles

• CELEX:62024CC0014: Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 23 April 2026.###
• CELEX:62025TO0234: Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 April 2026.#Deutsche Transnational Trustee Corporation, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark GUSTO – Earlier EU word mark GUSTONI – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Impartiality – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-234/25.
• CELEX:62025TO0374: Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 April 2026.#EO v European Parliament.#Civil Service – Members of the temporary staff – Publication of a press release by a political group of the Parliament – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Liability – Material and non-material harm – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-374/25.
• CELEX:62025CC0275: Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 23 April 2026.###
• CELEX:62025CJ0132: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#M.M. Ristorazione Srl v Villa Ramazzini Srl.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Directive 2004/48/EC – Enforcement of intellectual property rights – Article 9(5) – Provisional measures – Failure to institute proceedings leading to a decision on the merits of the case – National legislation providing for the continuation of the effects of provisional measures intended to anticipate the effects of a decision on the merits of the case.#Case C-132/25.
• CELEX:62024CC0799: Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 23 April 2026.###
• CELEX:62025CJ0204: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#Kempen Advies Beerse BV and Others v Bank Nagelmackers NV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 86/653/EEC – Article 15(2) – Article 19 – Self-employed commercial agents – Notice period – Date of expiry of the commercial agency contract.#Case C-204/25.
• CELEX:62024CJ0446: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#Freie Hansestadt Bremen v DT.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Directive 2008/115/EC – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Article 11(2) – Entry ban – Duration – National legislation which requires, in principle, an indefinite ban on entry and stay in certain cases – Terrorist threat.#Case C-446/24.
• CELEX:62024CC0456: Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 23 April 2026.###
• CELEX:62025CC0321: Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 23 April 2026.###
• CELEX:62024CJ0528_RES: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#LQ and Others v Minister for Justice and Equality.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part – Surrender of a person to the United Kingdom for the purpose of criminal prosecutions – Article 524(2) – Article 604(c) – Real risk to the protection of fundamental rights – Article 625 – Speciality rule – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy.#Case C-528/24.
• CELEX:62024CJ0118: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#EG Labo Laboratoires Eurogenerics SAS and Theramex France SAS v Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé (ANSM) and Biogaran SAS.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2001/83/EC – Medicinal products for human use – Articles 28 and 29 – Decentralised procedure for marketing authorisation for a medicinal product – Article 10 – Generic medicinal product – Abridged procedure for granting a marketing authorisation – Biological medicinal product serving as reference medicinal product for a chemical medicinal product – Jurisdiction of the courts of the Member States concerned to determine whether there is a potential serious risk for public health – Jurisdiction of those courts to revi
• CELEX:62025CC0142: Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 23 April 2026.###
• CELEX:62024CC0237: Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 23 April 2026.###
• CELEX:62026CJ0024:           Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 23 avril 2026.#CV contre Procuratore generale presso la Corte d’Appello.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Procédure préjudicielle d’urgence – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Directive 2012/29/UE – Normes minimales concernant les droits, le soutien et la protection des victimes de la criminalité – Articles 6, 10 et 18 – Droit de recevoir des informations relatives à l’affaire et droit d’être entendu – Réglementation nationale prévoyant une voie de recours extraordinaire, au bénéfice de la personne condamnée par défaut, tendant à obtenir l’annulation de la décision de condamnation devenue définitive – Absence de reconnaissance du droit de la victime d’être informée de l’introdu
• CELEX:62024CJ0882_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#AL v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – Remuneration – Dependent child allowances – Article 2 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Conditions for granting – Withdrawal of entitlement to the allowance – Recovery of overpayments under Article 85 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Action for annulment – Article 91 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Distortion – Assessment of the legality of an act at the date of its adoption – Retroactive scope of a judgment delivered by a national court – Res judicata.#Case C-882/24 P.
• CELEX:62025CC0414: Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 23 April 2026.###
• CELEX:62024CJ0811: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#Pescheria Il Granchio Blu di JC v Ministero delle Imprese e del Made in Italy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – De minimis aid – Regulation (EU) No 1407/2013 – Regulation (EU) No 1408/2013 – Regulation (EU) No 717/2014 – Respective scopes – Regulation (EU) No 1379/2013 – Fishery and aquaculture sector – Common organisation of the markets – Undertakings operating in the production, processing and marketing of fishery products – Retail trade – National legislation providing for de minimis aid for undertakings located in zones affected by earthquakes.#Case C-811/24.
• CELEX:62024CJ0761: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#HM and JD v AXA Bank Belgium SA and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts concluded between a seller or supplier and a consumer – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 2(c) – Concept of ‘seller or supplier’ – Article 6(1) – Effects of the finding that such a term is unfair – Invalidity of the contract – Article 7(1) – Deterrent effect of the prohibition on unfair terms – Loan agreement denominated in foreign currency – Contractual term placing the exchange rate risk on the consumer – Transfer of a contract among sellers or suppliers under national law – Seller or supplier against whom the consumer may assert the legal consequences of the invalidity of an unfai
• CELEX:62026CJ0024_RES:           Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 23 avril 2026.#CV contre Procuratore generale presso la Corte d’Appello.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Procédure préjudicielle d’urgence – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Directive 2012/29/UE – Normes minimales concernant les droits, le soutien et la protection des victimes de la criminalité – Articles 6, 10 et 18 – Droit de recevoir des informations relatives à l’affaire et droit d’être entendu – Réglementation nationale prévoyant une voie de recours extraordinaire, au bénéfice de la personne condamnée par défaut, tendant à obtenir l’annulation de la décision de condamnation devenue définitive – Absence de reconnaissance du droit de la victime d’être informée de l’int