Admin MPS / četrtek, 29. september 2022 / Categories: Aktualno EU zakonodaja - CELEX CELEX:32021R0523R(02) The corrigendum does not concern the English version. CELEX:32021R0522R(02) CELEX:32021R0638R(01) Print 139 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62024CO0403: Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 26 février 2026.#PRVO PLINARSKO DRUŠTVO d.o.o. contre Gazprom export LLC et Privredna banka Zagreb d.d.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Article 19, paragraphe 1, second alinéa, TUE – Protection juridictionnelle effective dans les domaines couverts par le droit de l’Union – Indépendance des juges – Tribunal établi préalablement par la loi – Procès équitable – Réglementation nationale prévoyant l’instauration d’un juge de l’enregistrement, dans les juridictions de deuxième instance, ayant, en pratique, le pouvoir de suspendre le prononcé d’un jugement – Incompatibilité de cette pratique – Caractère définitif du jugement concerné – Règlement (UE) 2020/1998 – Décision CELEX:62025TO0265: Ordonnance du Tribunal (neuvième chambre) du 27 février 2026.#IW contre Commission européenne et Agence européenne des médicaments.#Recours en indemnité – Santé publique – Médicaments à usage humain – Autorisation de mise sur le marché conditionnelle pour le médicament à usage humain COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca – Méconnaissance des exigences de forme – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire T-265/25. CELEX:62024CO0517(01): Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 26 février 2026.#VG.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 267 TFUE – Article 53, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – État de droit – Article 19, paragraphe 1, second alinéa, TUE – Protection juridictionnelle effective dans les domaines couverts par le droit de l’Union – Indépendance des juges – Izba Odpowiedzialności Zawodowej (chambre de la responsabilité professionnelle) du Sąd Najwyższy (Cour suprême, Pologne) – Possibilité de remettre en cause une condamnation disciplinaire définitive au stade d’une procédure de globalisation des peines – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-517/24. CELEX:32026D0523: Council Decision (EU) 2026/523 of 11 February 2026 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Regional Steering Committee of the Transport Community as regards certain changes to the rules on staff salaries of the Transport Community Permanent Secretariat CELEX:32025D1895R(01): Rectificatif à la décision (PESC) 2025/1895 du Conseil du 12 septembre 2025 modifiant la décision 2014/145/PESC concernant des mesures restrictives eu égard aux actions compromettant ou menaçant l’intégrité territoriale, la souveraineté et l’indépendance de l’Ukraine (JO L, 2025/1895, 15.9.2025) CELEX:32025R1894R(01): Rectificatif au règlement d’exécution (UE) 2025/1894 du Conseil du 12 septembre 2025 mettant en œuvre le règlement (UE) n° 269/2014 concernant des mesures restrictives eu égard aux actions compromettant ou menaçant l’intégrité territoriale, la souveraineté et l’indépendance de l’Ukraine (JO L, 2025/1894, 15.9.2025) CELEX:62024CJ0409_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#J-GmbH and D v Finanzamt K and Finanzamt F.#References for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 98 – Option for the Member States to apply a reduced rate of VAT to certain supplies of goods and services – Short-term accommodation in hotels and similar establishments – Annex III, point (12) – Reduced rate of VAT applicable to accommodation provided in hotels and similar establishments – Supplies that are ancillary to accommodation – National regulations establishing a mechanism for separating taxable transactions – No application of the reduced VAT rate to supplies that are not directly used for the accommodation – Principle of fiscal neutrality.#Joined C CELEX:62024TO0267_RES: Ordonnance du Tribunal (quatrième chambre, siégeant avec cinq juges) du 26 février 2026.#Christofer Edge contre Banque européenne d'investissement.#Recours en annulation – Fonction publique – Personnel de la BEI – Délai de recours – Article 41a du règlement du personnel de la BEI – Computation des délais – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-267/24. CELEX:62024CJ0367_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#Autoritatea Naţională pentru Administrare şi Reglementare în Comunicaţii v Telekom România Mobile Communications.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications – Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 – Measures concerning open internet access – Article 3(3) – Obligation on providers of internet access services to treat traffic equally and without discrimination, restriction or interference – Possibility, for those providers, to implement reasonable traffic management measures – Tariff option entailing a bandwidth limitation in respect of video streaming.#Case C-367/24. CELEX:62024CJ0436: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Skatteverket v Lyko Operations AB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 30a – Supply of goods – Concept of ‘voucher’ – Classification – Customer loyalty programme in the form of points awarded on the basis of previous purchases – Points which may be redeemed for products of low value.#Case C-436/24. CELEX:62024CJ0457: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Romania v European Commission.#Appeal – Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) – European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/2020 – Expenditure excluded from European Union financing – Expenditure incurred by Romania – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 52 – Conformity clearance procedure – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 908/2014 – Article 34 – Change in the legal basis of the European Commission’s proposals for financial corrections – Possibility for the Member State concerned to make its views on those proposals known in a meaningful way – Concept of ‘external factor’ – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Article 44 – Diversif CELEX:62024CJ0151: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) v V. M.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/98/EU – Rights for third-country workers who hold a single permit – Article 12 – Right to equal treatment – Third-country national – Residence permit for family reasons – Social security – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Coordination of social security systems – Article 3 – Concept of ‘branches of social security’ – Article 70 – Special non-contributory cash benefits – Social allowance for the elderly living in indigence – Conditions for granting – Exclusion of third-country nationals who do not hold an EU residence permit for long-term residents.#Case C-151/24. CELEX:62025CC0070: Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 5 March 2026.### CELEX:62025CC0819: Conclusions de l'avocat général M. R. Norkus, présentées le 5 mars 2026.### CELEX:62024CO0745_SUM: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb eV v GLOBUS Handelshof GmbH & Co. KG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Saarbrücken.#Case C-745/24. CELEX:62024CJ0409: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#J-GmbH and D v Finanzamt K and Finanzamt F.#References for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 98 – Option for the Member States to apply a reduced rate of VAT to certain supplies of goods and services – Short-term accommodation in hotels and similar establishments – Annex III, point (12) – Reduced rate of VAT applicable to accommodation provided in hotels and similar establishments – Supplies that are ancillary to accommodation – National regulations establishing a mechanism for separating taxable transactions – No application of the reduced VAT rate to supplies that are not directly used for the accommodation – Principle of fiscal neutrality.#Joined Cases CELEX:62024CJ0309: Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 5 mars 2026.#Roberto Passalacqua contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Fonctionnaire – Promotion – Exercice de promotion 2021 – Décision de ne pas promouvoir le requérant au grade AD 11 – Article 45, paragraphe 1, du statut des fonctionnaires de l’Union européenne – Comparaison des mérites – Obligation de motivation – Répartition de la charge de la preuve.#Affaire C-309/24 P. CELEX:62024CJ0613: Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 5 mars 2026.#Commission européenne contre République portugaise.#Manquement d’État – Article 260, paragraphe 2, TFUE – Arrêt de la Cour constatant un manquement – Environnement – Directive 92/43/CEE – Faune et flore sauvages – Conservation des habitats naturels ainsi que de la faune et de la flore sauvages – Article 4, paragraphe 4 – Annexes I et II – Sites d’importance communautaire – Zones spéciales de conservation – Absence de désignation – Article 6, paragraphe 1 – Mesures de conservation nécessaires – Absence d’adoption – Inexécution de l’arrêt de la Cour – Sanctions pécuniaires – Somme forfaitaire – Astreinte.#Affaire C-613/24. CELEX:62024CJ0458_RES: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#DO v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Article 3(2) – Article 29 – Transfer of the asylum seeker to the Member State responsible for examining the application for international protection – Suspension, by the Member State responsible, of the taking charge and taking back of asylum seekers – Directive (EU) 2013/32 – Article 33 – Inadmissible applications.#Case C-458/24. CELEX:62024CJ0539_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 November 2025.#Mikroregion Porta Bohemica v Odvolací finanční ředitelství.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 – Concept of ‘irregularity’ – Article 1(2) – Limitation periods – Article 3 – Starting point and duration of the limitation periods – Project co-financed through EU resources.#Case C-539/24. Comments are only visible to subscribers.