Related articles

• CELEX:62025CO0266:           Ordonnance de rectification du 21 octobre 2026.#I-Sete - Inovação, Soluções Económicas e Tecnologias Ecológicas, Lda. contre EDIA- Empresa de Desenvolvimento e Infra-estruturas do Alqueva, S.A.#Rectification d’arrêt.#Affaires jointes C-266/25 et C-267/25.
• CELEX:62026CO0446_SUM: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 July 2026.#RI v Openbaar Ministerie.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of conducting a criminal prosecution or executing custodial sentences – Article 6(1) – Issuing judicial authority – Article 8(1)(c) – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office on the basis of a national arrest warrant issued by a court – No judicial review concerning the issue of the European arrest warrant –
• CELEX:62024CJ0857_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#daa plc, anciennement Dublin Airport Authority plc and Others v Irish Aviation Authority and Airport Coordination Limited.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Irlande).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 – Allocation of slots at European Union airports – Article 6 – Coordination parameters – Determination taking account of relevant technical, operational and environmental constraints – Urban planning rules – Limit on the annual number of air passengers – Article 8 – Process of slot allocation – Historic slots – Grandfather rights – Articles 16 and 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-857/24.
• CELEX:62024TJ0460_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 September 2026.#Polina Sergeevna Gagarina v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘support of actions which undermine the territorial integrity of Ukraine’ – Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 269/201
• CELEX:62025TJ0205_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 October 2026.#Giulio Cesare Rizza v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Form annexed to a request for assistance sent by a national competition authority to the national competition authority of another Member State – Partial refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – Overriding public interest.#Case T-205/25.
• CELEX:62024TJ0203_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Zalando SE v European Commission.#Case T-203/24.
• CELEX:62025TJ0371_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Dentek Oral Care, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark dentix – Earlier EU word marks DENTEK and earlier EU figurative marks DenTek – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-371/25.
• CELEX:62025TJ0302_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 September 2026.#Van Eck Associates Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark MARKETVECTOR INDEXES – Earlier EU word mark VECTOR FUND – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character – Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-302/25.
• CELEX:62025CJ0133_INF:           Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#PV contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Pension d’ancienneté – Conditions d’octroi – Statut des fonctionnaires de l’Union européenne – Article 77 – Durée minimale de service – Absences injustifiées ou irrégulières – Article 59, paragraphe 3 – Article 60 – Imputation des absences irrégulières ou injustifiées sur la durée du congé annuel – Conséquences en cas d’épuisement dudit congé – Perte du bénéfice de la rémunération pour la période correspondant aux absences irrégulières ou injustifiées – Privation de plein droit du bénéfice de l’acquisition de droits à pension d’ancienneté pour la période concernée.#Affaire C-133/25 P.
• CELEX:62024CJ0309_INF: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Roberto Passalacqua v European Commission.#Case C-309/24 P.
• CELEX:62026CO0222:           Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 19 octobre 2026.#Prokuratura Regionalna w Lublinie contre HG e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Nécessité d’une interprétation du droit de l’Union pour que la juridiction de renvoi puisse rendre son jugement – Absence – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-222/26.
• CELEX:62025TJ0683_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 September 2026.#Freie Sachsen v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-683/25.
• CELEX:62024TJ0416_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2026.#ES v European Commission.#Civil service – Recruitment – Internal competition COM/AD/03/22 (AD 5) – Decision not to admit the applicant to the next stage of the competition – Principle of good administration – Duty of diligence and duty of care – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-416/24.
• CELEX:62026CO0111_INF: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 14 July 2026.#VOICE – Bundesverband der IT-Anwender eV v Cloud Infrastructure Services Providers in Europe (CISPE) and European Commission.#Appeal – Action for annulment – Application to intervene – Admissibility of the request – Time limit for lodging – Method for calculating the time limit – Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union – Extension of the time limit on account of distance – Out of time – Effective judicial protection – Principle of equal treatment.#Case C-111/26 P(I).
• CELEX:32019R2144R(06)
• CELEX:32019R0877R(05)
• CELEX:32024R1183R(07)
• CELEX:32026D2456: Decision (EU) 2026/2456 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 October 2026 on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers following an application from Finland – EGF/2026/003 FI/Valmet Automotive
• CELEX:32026D2453: Decision (EU) 2026/2453 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 October 2026 on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers following an application from Spain – EGF/2026/002 ES/Galicia automotive ancillary
• CELEX:32026D2455: Decision (EU) 2026/2455 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 October 2026 on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers following an application from Belgium – EGF/2026/001 BE/Cora